ADVERTISEMENT

GYERO ARCHIVE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Totally forgot to send in my sons $33 for a field trip tomorrow, but we did send in the signed permission slip.

Called the school when my son got home upset he can’t go and simply asked if we could please run the money up there which would take 5 minutes.

Office lady pages the teacher who proceeds to tell me no this will just be a life lesson which I mean ok, but you are punishing my son not me so take that life lesson and shove it up your ass……..

Sir we explained to the kids not to wait until the last minute and Wyatt specifically asked me for his slip 3 times.

Yes and we signed it and sent it in 3 weeks ago, so for real my son isn’t going because I messed up, hope that makes you feel good. So what’s my son doing tomorrow while his whole class is on this field trip?

Well this happened to about 10 kids and since his whole team is going besides those 10 they’ll sit in ISAP which is in school detention.

LOL, I tell ya what I’ll pay for all 10 kids to go right now just so no one is left behind.

No sir I can’t let you do that.

Ok well, cool. My son won’t be there tomorrow maybe I’ll just take him to mammoth cave myself just to make sure he doesn’t miss out. No matter what tho I seriously doubt we learn this life lesson you are trying to teach, but I do hope you feel better about yourself getting this kind of control over your kids when their parents make a mistake that’s awfully big of you!

Turn around and tell my son sorry……..his response “well if I don’t have to go to school tomorrow it’s fine, but if you really want to make up for it I’d love some El nopal for dinner”.

Burritos and Margaritas it is! Lesson learned!!
Pathetic Nazi ball breaking HUER.
Your patience is admirable.
Not sure I could have done it that way.
HUERS everywhere.
 
They make a ton in Indiana and Utah these days. Hell, Indiana basically launched most of the younger brands. The main line worldwide brands could probably easily drop the Kentucky and most of the world wouldn't even notice. The ryes could move tomorrow. Not saying the tax bill is right, I don't know enough about it, but the thought future expansion couldn't be moved, is silly.
I said my thoughts on the tax on the show but it’s absurd to think these companies are going anywhere. There are new distilleries opening in Kentucky every month. I do a remote at almost all of them when they do. The tourism is here, not in Utah or Indiana. I will eat my hat if any of these places of any substance move anywhere. I disagree with Rob’s point but it’s at least logically consistent. But the idea these bourbons are going to move is ridiculous.

I am sure you enjoy your “Indiana” bourbon but for an industry to have expanded at an exponential rate to then act like a tax that is 130 years old somehow hinders growth is ludicrous
 
I said my thoughts on the tax on the show but it’s absurd to think these companies are going anywhere. There are new distilleries opening in Kentucky every month. I do a remote at almost all of them when they do. The tourism is here, not in Utah or Indiana. I will eat my hat if any of these places of any substance move anywhere. I disagree with Rob’s point but it’s at least logically consistent. But the idea these bourbons are going to move is ridiculous.

I am sure you enjoy your “Indiana” bourbon but for an industry to have expanded at an exponential rate to then act like a tax that is 130 years old somehow hinders growth is ludicrous
Buffalo Trace et al obviously aren't leaving Kentucky, but nothing is stopping them from building their next warehouse somewhere with lower taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HUBER and UKRob 73
Buffalo Trace et al obviously aren't leaving Kentucky, but nothing is stopping them from building their next warehouse somewhere with lower taxes.
Well that’s not what Anth said. Maybe they will move some warehouses but I doubt it. Either way, let’s see them do it consistently first.

But remember most of these distilleries have special deals with local government that help them either avoid altogether (for a period of time) or lessen their property tax. Most local governments agreed to those bc of the barrel tax

Take that away (and since sales aren’t local) and they get almost nothing. Plus the state isn’t reducing its tax, which by the way is exponentially more.

They ain’t moving. They just don’t want to pay.
 
Well that’s not what Anth said. Maybe they will move some warehouses but I doubt it. Either way, let’s see them do it consistently first.

But remember most of these distilleries have special deals with local government that help them either avoid altogether (for a period of time) or lessen their property tax. Most local governments agreed to those bc of the barrel tax

Take that away (and since sales aren’t local) and they get almost nothing. Plus the state isn’t reducing its tax, which by the way is exponentially more.

They ain’t moving. They just don’t want to pay.
Actually, that's exactly what I said.

"but the thought future expansion couldn't be moved, is silly."


Also, MGP in Indiana, is massive, and I guarantee was in the bottles of several of your remotes.
 
Last edited:
In like 95% of the world Jack Daniel's is listed on bourbon lists. You're telling me the word Kentucky is gonna keep Sazarac or Diageo from moving or rebranding the mainlines? Come on. Major corps will move a plant to another country for fractions of a percentage. The tax thing is unfortunate for the local communities but is this much different than the tax benefits we just gave the battery plants?
 
private labeling in indiana would support taxing aging barrels in bardstown in my view.

Im conflicted so ill just say I Imagine there are a few bourbon lobbyist with strong pours tonight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthonys735
Well that’s not what Anth said. Maybe they will move some warehouses but I doubt it. Either way, let’s see them do it consistently first.

But remember most of these distilleries have special deals with local government that help them either avoid altogether (for a period of time) or lessen their property tax. Most local governments agreed to those bc of the barrel tax

Take that away (and since sales aren’t local) and they get almost nothing. Plus the state isn’t reducing its tax, which by the way is exponentially more.

They ain’t moving. They just don’t want to pay.
We're the horse capital of the world too, but that hasn't stopped states like Florida and New York from offering better tax incentives and deteriorating the local industry.

And the state is reducing taxes that affect the bourbon companies, as an offset to an increased number of services being taxed.
 
How many examples, like literally thousands of examples, of a government trying to tax a corporation and then it completely backfiring on them need to happen before we stop acting like it’s somehow beneficial for a government to try and suck money out of an entity? Growing up in Charleston, WV aka the chemical capital of the world at one point, the population used to be 120k when I lived there in the 90s. It’s now 47k and it’s a total dump. They kept taxing the chemical plants and they all just moved, the biggest to Midland, MI. They lost a massive population of PhD chemists and their kids to boot, so they not only have 1/3 the population paying taxes (losing more in taxes than they ever had from the companies) but the remaining population is less educated and poorer. And by the way - the taxes that drive the companies away don’t even do shit anyway - you’d be better off taxing companies less allowing them to grow to bring in more people and other businesses that will pay multiples more in taxes in the long run.
 
They make a ton in Indiana and Utah these days. Hell, Indiana basically launched most of the younger brands. The main line worldwide brands could probably easily drop the Kentucky and most of the world wouldn't even notice. The ryes could move tomorrow. Not saying the tax bill is right, I don't know enough about it, but the thought future expansion couldn't be moved, is silly.
Exactly… and being that most/if not all major distilleries are owned by mega foreign conglomerates… they don’t give a f*ck about BJW or Hilljack locals.
 
I said my thoughts on the tax on the show but it’s absurd to think these companies are going anywhere. There are new distilleries opening in Kentucky every month. I do a remote at almost all of them when they do. The tourism is here, not in Utah or Indiana. I will eat my hat if any of these places of any substance move anywhere. I disagree with Rob’s point but it’s at least logically consistent. But the idea these bourbons are going to move is ridiculous.

I am sure you enjoy your “Indiana” bourbon but for an industry to have expanded at an exponential rate to then act like a tax that is 130 years old somehow hinders growth is ludicrous
Ross & Squibb (MGP) produces more juice than any Ky distillery. Almost EVERY rye you’ve ever tasted, came from Indiana.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthonys735
How many examples, like literally thousands of examples, of a government trying to tax a corporation and then it completely backfiring on them need to happen before we stop acting like it’s somehow beneficial for a government to try and suck money out of an entity? Growing up in Charleston, WV aka the chemical capital of the world at one point, the population used to be 120k when I lived there in the 90s. It’s now 47k and it’s a total dump. They kept taxing the chemical plants and they all just moved, the biggest to Midland, MI. They lost a massive population of PhD chemists and their kids to boot, so they not only have 1/3 the population paying taxes (losing more in taxes than they ever had from the companies) but the remaining population is less educated and poorer. And by the way - the taxes that drive the companies away don’t even do shit anyway - you’d be better off taxing companies less allowing them to grow to bring in more people and other businesses that will pay multiples more in taxes in the long run.

Denzel Washington GIF
 
Almost every fledgling distillery sources or sourced MGP and blends / bottles / sells it until their distillate stock comes to age in their barrels. They are a contract distiller.

MGPs 95/5 rye juice is the current standard tasting profile … meanwhile historic recipes are quite different. It’s just that MGP stole the space.

Remus Repeal Reserve, Gatsby & Volstead are MGPs premium releases that are friggin delicious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pretzel__logic
The bourbon lobbyists have been trying to get this tax taken away for 20 years. They have made the same “we are moving” arguments and production and storage continue to rise in Kentucky at historic levels

When they take away the tax, the state will end up having to bail out these counties and their school districts. It is inevitable (and now actually contemplated and allowed for in the bill).

As far as I know, the fledgling companies may be outsourcing until their stock is ready, but they are still storing their future stock (and paying the tax) here. I am not sure that makes the point you are trying to make.

Either way, to not take advantage of the one industry we have that actually can lead to outside foreign companies contributing to our tax base disproportionately is absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gattongrad09
How many examples, like literally thousands of examples, of a government trying to tax a corporation and then it completely backfiring on them need to happen before we stop acting like it’s somehow beneficial for a government to try and suck money out of an entity? Growing up in Charleston, WV aka the chemical capital of the world at one point, the population used to be 120k when I lived there in the 90s. It’s now 47k and it’s a total dump. They kept taxing the chemical plants and they all just moved, the biggest to Midland, MI. They lost a massive population of PhD chemists and their kids to boot, so they not only have 1/3 the population paying taxes (losing more in taxes than they ever had from the companies) but the remaining population is less educated and poorer. And by the way - the taxes that drive the companies away don’t even do shit anyway - you’d be better off taxing companies less allowing them to grow to bring in more people and other businesses that will pay multiples more in taxes in the long run.
I defer to you on Charleston history but a little research shows the Main chemical companies left in early 2000s (I will just assume for reasons you said)

Your population losses seem a little off. I would suggest data shows coal was a bigger issue

From Wikipedia (I don’t know how to post a pic on here) says the population was

1990: 57,000
2000: 53,000
2020: 48,000

In the 1960 census it topped out at 80,000. The loss is still significant between when you lived there and now and I assume you are correct as to reason (although I bet coal is a part) but it isn’t nearly what you say it is
 
You want a way to drive businesses away? Tax the shit out of them.

Syracuse NY was discussed here not too long ago as being terrible… it is terrible. the entirety of Upstate NY (sans Saratoga)was gutted by terrible tax burdens levied on businesses and they ALL left. Years of bad policy has left 100 small cities stranded with union mentality folks unemployed and impoverished. The height of rust belt causation. It sucks.

Big business will move to save a buck.

Texas, Tennessee, Florida have been collecting eloping industry trying to uphold their fiduciary obligations to their shareholders.
 
You want a way to drive businesses away? Tax the shit out of them.

Syracuse NY was discussed here not too long ago as being terrible… it is terrible. the entirety of Upstate NY (sans Saratoga)was gutted by terrible tax burdens levied on businesses and they ALL left. Years of bad policy has left 100 small cities stranded with union mentality folks unemployed and impoverished. The height of rust belt causation. It sucks.

Big business will move to save a buck.

Texas, Tennessee, Florida have been collecting eloping industry trying to uphold their fiduciary obligations to their shareholders.
The barrel tax is Pennies compared to the state tax. And as I have noted it has been in place for 130 years and no one has moved. The industry has exploded

In general I actually agree with you on corporate taxation. In this example it is a rhetorical device that isn’t grounded in the actual reality of the industry or the small scale of the tax
 
I don’t really like the fact that the author of the bill is from Elkton. WTF does someone from ELKTON care about the bourbon tax?

Just to play some devils advocate though the value of the employee withholdings from having these jobs in these cities/counties is probably significantly higher than what the barrel tax brings if the $4 per barrel number the guy quoted is correct.
 
The barrels are being stored in Indiana. Right across the river. So, unless these places are aging after they buy them, they're not, then the tax wouldn't factor in if I'm reading it right. Krazy may know more on that process.

Bulleit is one of the biggest brands in the world, they've been building tons of new rickhouses in Kentucky, and wasn't even around 25 years ago. Other than the historic brands, I don't see history playing much of a part.

When you're growing at the rate these places are growing then your influence grows as well. I just don't see it as a cut and dry issue.
 
The barrel tax is Pennies compared to the state tax. And as I have noted it has been in place for 130 years and no one has moved. The industry has exploded

In general I actually agree with you on corporate taxation. In this example it is a rhetorical device that isn’t grounded in the actual reality of the industry or the small scale of the tax
When you see the breakdown of the voting and it’s split evenly between parties, you know the lobby has been ‘successful’ hedging their bets. It’s sad.

The thing is, the bourbon industry is not a local thing… it’s a cutthroat global enterprise hidden behind the charm and storyboard of aww-shucks-small town Ky family distillers, rickhouses, and stories about this batch is from Freddie Noe’s granny’s beaten biscuits… it’s bullshit. Campari and Sazerac have the politicians bought and paid for.

The sports gambol, casino, and weed taxes should pay they shortfall in barrel tax income.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT