The author of that article makes a number of claims about our ability to control the weather and then provides links to the sources behind each of those claims.
But what I find most interesting, is that the sources seem to say the exact opposite of what the article’s author says.
For example, the author of the article states that “
Project Cirrus of 1947 attempted to modify a hurricane off the coast of Florida only to artificially redirect it to demolish parts of Georgia.”
But when you read the source article, it says that project Cirrus had zero effect on the hurricane. Which would make sense intuitively. All they did during Project Cirrus was drop 80kg of dry ice into the clouds on the edge of the hurricane. The source article even goes as far as to say it’s laughable to believe that 80kg of dry ice would be capable of disrupting a hurricane.
I’m not sure how the Gateway Pundit author could screw that up so badly.