I don't know why a Title IX process makes this any more of an issue than your guard and variety "hanky-panky"....but his side can be proved if his statements are valid....this in no way is grounds for not paying Tucker his contract out in full.
In his statement, Tucker once again confirmed that he had a late night conversation over the phone with Tracy, which is at the heart of her allegations.
However, in his version of events, Tucker says that Tracy "initiated the discussion that night, sent me a provocative picture of the two of us together, suggested what she may look like without clothes, and never once during the 36 minutes did she object in any manner, much less hang up the phone."
In USA Today's report, Tucker described the phone call to the investigator as "consensual phone sex" between him and Tracy. He maintained that assertion in his statement.
"While I am saddened by Ms. Tracy's disclosure of the sensitive nature of this call, let me be perfectly clear—it was an entirely mutual, private event between two adults living at opposite ends of the country," Tucker said.
Tucker claims that Tracy gave him "every indication that everything was fine" in the months following the private phone call, saying Tracy even sent him a 'Happy Father's Day' card two months after their conversation that night, and expressing a desire to return to Michigan State.
Tucker also claims that the investigation conducted by a third-party attorney for MSU is not actually a Title IX investigation.
"That's inaccurate," Tucker wrote. "The University admitted there is no Title IX jurisdiction, so the investigation of my private life was relegated to an alleged policy violation."
Tucker said the University's investigation was not fair or unbiased, but a way to get out of paying him the full 10-year, $95 million contract extension he signed in 2021.