No, they were not cool with the inappropriate relationship and the AD discussed this.
Petrino never disclosed his conflict of interest in hiring Dorrell or the payment, Long said. "Coach Petrino abused his authority when over the past few weeks he made a staff decision and personal choices that benefited himself and jeopardized the integrity of the football program," Long said.
That’s what got Petrino fired. He violated clear university policies and opened the school up to a sexual harassment lawsuit from Dorrell. As the Arkansas sexual harassment policy states, even consensual relationships between supervisors and employees may result in sexual harassment charges. And shortly before Petrino’s firing, Dorrell had retained an attorney.
Per Petrino’s contract and University policy, it was the inappropriate relationship that got him fired. This wasn’t simply just an affair. It was an affair that violated university policy, opened the school up to litigation and represented an abuse of authority. As I mentioned before, if Petrino simply had an affair with his neighbor and lied about that, he would’ve likely kept his job. But that’s not what happened. He had an affair with an employee.
Don’t get me wrong, his deceit was certainly an aggravating factor, but the grounds for his dismissal were rooted in the inappropriate relationship. The relationship is what creates the greatest risk of injury to the school.