Max is still Max, but Lando Norris is right on his heels. That start doomed him, otherwise he gets the win. He (Norris) is a ridiculously talented driver, and well might cut the "Era of Max" short.
Just looked like aggressive driving from both of them to me, with Max misjudging things at the end and causing the collision. Not sure I saw anything I’d call childish.That post looks pretty prophetic, in light of the childish, desperate driving display the Max put on today.
Red Bull's advantage is crumbling, and Max is reverting back to his old, irrational self.
What a child...
You're correct. Verstappen looked like a clown today.That post looks pretty prophetic, in light of the childish, desperate driving display the Max put on today.
Red Bull's advantage is crumbling, and Max is reverting back to his old, irrational self.
What a child...
Just looked like aggressive driving from both of them to me, with Max misjudging things at the end and causing the collision. Not sure I saw anything I’d call childish.
Agreed.He kept reacting laterally in the braking zone, everytime Norris chose a line (with DNS no less) which is a big no no.
The racing stewards were even more at fault. It was clear that things were escalating to a stupid degree, and yet they refused to act quickly, when it might have mattered.
The FIA dropped the no moving under braking rule before the start of the 2017 season because they wanted to give drivers more freedom to battle.He kept reacting laterally in the braking zone, everytime Norris chose a line (with DNS no less) which is a big no no.
The racing stewards were even more at fault. It was clear that things were escalating to a stupid degree, and yet they refused to act quickly, when it might have mattered.
While he may be allowed to move a bit, Max still caused the collision. Norris was also far enough alongside that he was entitled to a car’s width of space. Verstapppen crowded Norris a bit too much and was therefore more at fault.It seems you're correct. I was mistaken about that rule.
Which begs the question; why did the penalize Max 10 seconds?
You got that right. I can’t wait for the race.One thing is for sure, if you're an F1 fan: The British GP is now appointment television. LOL
While he may be allowed to move a bit, Max still caused the collision. Norris was also far enough alongside that he was entitled to a car’s width of space. Verstapppen crowded Norris a bit too much and was therefore more at fault.
I don’t have any issue with the penalty; Max was more at fault for the collision so he deserved it. I was more reacting to how the incident overall was being characterized. It looked like good hard racing to me, and sometimes drivers misjudge things and cause collisions when they’re racing that hard.
In my opinion, I didn't see anything that egregious but that’s just me. I thoroughly enjoyed the battle and hope this continues over the rest of the season.
It will be interesting to see how Merc and GR play out next season with the new set ups. GR will be the MAIN Man with Hamilton moving over to Ferrari.George Russell is a helluva driver. I just don't think Mercedes has their stuff dialed in. And yet, even w/o that, GR is right there, time and time again. I know Hamilton doesn't like it, but GR is D1 for Mercedes.
Think of it as Formula 1 being the Majors in baseball.Is there a Formula 2?
What does Formula 1 mean?
You're right about that. Formula 1 could use a little NASCAResque grudge racing. MIght toughen up those fragile nancies...
F1 drivers are ALSO pretty fragile. LOL
So there really is F2 and F3? I’ll be damned.Think of it as Formula 1 being the Majors in baseball.
F2 and F3 are the minor leagues. (different cars/setups, easier to drive etc. )