Considering the fans response, I wouldn't come back...
![Scream :scream: :scream:](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1684399.png)
Considering the fans response, I wouldn't come back...
The NBA's denying kids the right to sell their services as scores do every day in baseball and other sports (see tennis, soccer,etc.) is in-American. He and others should be free to do whatever they want to do. P.S. he'll be back.They arent trolls...they dont like his decision and ots America..they dont have to like it
Not sure about all of you but I am a fan of the University of Kentucky not the University of NBA draft picks....... I am more interested in UK winning titles not how many draft picks that we have in the league.........
Considering the fans response, I wouldn't come back...
Hopefully he is not hearing this type of complaining that we see on the message boards.
For a player with NBA aspirations, there is absolutely no reason not to put your name in. You get the NBA feedback, find out where they slot you now, AND what you need to work on to move up for next year. And in the unlikely event that you are projected as a lottery pick, maybe you stay in the draft.
He is NOT a lottery pick this year, unless he goes to some tryout and simply dominates Monk (not happening).
1) this is a deep draft, although maybe not at 2G, but that is usually the position in least demand
2) next year is expected to not be nearly as good/deep a draft
3) Best case he is probably going in the last 1/4 of the first round.
4) Next year there is a good chance he could go in the lottery. That is a significant $ difference.
Can someone explain to me how he could be drafted anyway? I thought you had to be 19 & 1 yr out of HS. If he graduated in Dec, then he won't be 1 yr out of HS until next Dec.
You know, Cal always says he never promises these kids anything, but he clearly promised Diallo that he didn't have to play if he didn't want to. For those of you who continue to ignore the obvious, Diallo is gone. You don't wait til the last day if it's just a routine testing of the waters. More striking though, you don't thank your coaches and teammates if you're planning on returning.As I feared, this is already news being posted on several major news sites. If you are proud of this for Kentucky basketball I feel sorry for you. It's an embarrassment and only ads to the false perception that Kentucky is just a one and done program with no regard for college athletics. Plus, I will repeat if this kid is good enough to be drafted then he should have played and maybe we would be national champions. However, I hope and pray he does return and then much of this will be forgotten.
You make a good point,in the case of Diallo the "waters" change with each draft,so what they are like this year is not what they will be like next year.Diallo hasn't played a minute for UK so you could say if he goes we are losing nothing.I put this in another thread but this seems to be getting all the traffic. Cal has said on multiple occasions that 8 players will be leaving. If he is being truthful, that means that either Diallo or Bam will be returning.
Fox
Monk
Briscoe
Mulder
Willis
Hawkins
Humphries
That is 7, so either Bam or Diallo would be 8 and is staying in draft, with one of them returning. If you look at it that way, it is a positive. I still don't think Diallo is going anywhere and will be back. Smart to test waters and get feedback.
He was in a post graduation prep school, more or less. He is 19 and his class graduated last May.Hopefully he is not hearing this type of complaining that we see on the message boards.
For a player with NBA aspirations, there is absolutely no reason not to put your name in. You get the NBA feedback, find out where they slot you now, AND what you need to work on to move up for next year. And in the unlikely event that you are projected as a lottery pick, maybe you stay in the draft.
He is NOT a lottery pick this year, unless he goes to some tryout and simply dominates Monk (not happening).
1) this is a deep draft, although maybe not at 2G, but that is usually the position in least demand
2) next year is expected to not be nearly as good/deep a draft
3) Best case he is probably going in the last 1/4 of the first round.
4) Next year there is a good chance he could go in the lottery. That is a significant $ difference.
Can someone explain to me how he could be drafted anyway? I thought you had to be 19 & 1 yr out of HS. If he graduated in Dec, then he won't be 1 yr out of HS until next Dec.
I hope Cal has learned from this fiasco.
For me personally, I don't care what Diallo does. However, I'm not going to be dense to the fact why some fans are going to get upset about the whole situation. If he stays in the draft, you basically had a kid that found a way around the rules to sit 1/2 a semester and go pro leaving nothing beneficial for UK fans and the team. For people who claim UK is nothing more than a NBA farm club, Diallo is dab smack example number one.
I think Cal had to take him because he's a great player and the off chance you get him for a year is probably worth it, since there are hopefully, readily replaceable players for him if he does stay in. I just in good conscience, can't blame fans for saying they don't about Diallo and his success. If he stays in he brought literally nothing to the table for the University and I see why fans are upset. good luck to him if he stays in but for some fans, they don't have a connection for the player.
Even if it is, it's an NBA farm club that wins a LOT of games, is in the hunt just about every year, and has a LOT of entertaining players. If that's not enough for some fans, oh well.
That's fantastic and all if you could care less about winning titles. One and done is the way to go. One title/one & done players.I have also been to four final fours and won a title in the past 7 years.
Signed Cal
8 titles in 100+ years...SoooooooooooooooThat's fantastic and all if you could care less about winning titles. One and done is the way to go. One title/one & done players.
yes, and two or three newly created posts that probably should/will be merged with this oneThere's 23 pages of this already.
that I'll agree with, IF he doesn't come back (and I think he does)To bad we didnt get to see him play in one game. That part sucks
The hand wringers are getting a lot heat from the pumpers , will be interesting to see how the pumping goes if Ky loses 10-15 games next year . Easy to set back now and say " Cal has got this " stop worrying , but if Bamba doesnt come , I dont see a roster that is that is a huge threat in a league where you have to be 10-15 points better than the opponent to win. Wish it were different ( fair) !
Technically, it's 8 titles in 78 years...just busting your chops8 titles in 100+ years...Sooooooooooooooo
Point one, his history here - a contender every year except for once when the presumptive No 1 pick in the draft was lost to injury - gives pretty good comfort as to how that will turn out. Every year we lose a game and they come out of the woodwork, and every year (but one) they are proved wrong. Nothing will change.The hand wringers are getting a lot heat from the pumpers , will be interesting to see how the pumping goes if Ky loses 10-15 games next year . Easy to set back now and say " Cal has got this " stop worrying , but if Bamba doesnt come , I dont see a roster that is that is a huge threat in a league where you have to be 10-15 points better than the opponent to win. Wish it were different ( fair) !
yes...WHAT is the fiasco?I'm sorry, but this made me laugh.
and GOD forbid we have a "down" year; for the standards UK has set for itself the past 8 yearsA ten loss team went to the title game in 2014, so that's not necessarily a deal-breaker. Especially when you consider we are returning basically no experience at all.
Point one, his history here - a contender every year except for once when the presumptive No 1 pick in the draft was lost to injury - gives pretty good comfort as to how that will turn out. Every year we lose a game and they come out of the woodwork, and every year (but one) they are proved wrong. Nothing will change.
But, fair question - what if next year goes bad? Is Cal not allowed to have a down year? What if we go 19-12 next year and get bounced first weekend of the tournament? At that point, he'd be 9 years in, will have won 80+% of his games, will still have won more games since he got here than any other coach, will still have more tournament wins and a better tournament winning percentage than any other coach, will still have more final fours since he got here than any other coach, will still have 4 final fours and a title in 9 years. IOW, a record to be celebrated - anywhere. Is he not allowed a down year? And you know, even with that record, if we have a down year, the usual crowd will be on here crowing "I told you this system doesn't work!!"
because, you see, it's a free country we live in, and anyone can say anything they want to say - even if it makes them look stupid or uninformed or histrionic......
Ok, since Rupp's 4th and last in 1958, we have had 4.Technically, it's 8 titles in 78 years...just busting your chops