Thank you Mike Stoops. 12 years here or whatever, and the offense is still a work in progress. What does that tell you?The information that is coming out indicates there was no riff between Stoops and Coen, he just wanted to test the NFL waters again to see what he was worth. My own take is when Stoops decided to interview with A&M Coen felt that gave him a free pass to do likewise.
Regarding the offense. Coen calls the plays and is also responsible for substitutions along with the position coaches. His offense has a lot of motion and "eye candy" to get the defense to expose itself presnap. It also has a lot of subing. The pace is strictly part of Coen's design and he has spoken about this in pressers indicate that he is looking for ways to speed it up.
I realize Stoops is a lot of people's favorite target right now everything from offense pace to the price of tea in China, but those thoughts are without any basis or merit. Stoops is committed to modernizing the offense which is why he brought Coen in, in the first place. The offense is a work in progress and though it had it's issues, they still put up 10 PPG more than last season. Regardless of how many plays you run that's measurable progress.
Anti-Stoopers have gigged everything about the past season, some admittedly with good reason. But none have commented on the efficient offense of the last 2 games when UK actually looked like a different team. I'm looking forward to how the new plug and plays fit in.The information that is coming out indicates there was no riff between Stoops and Coen, he just wanted to test the NFL waters again to see what he was worth. My own take is when Stoops decided to interview with A&M Coen felt that gave him a free pass to do likewise.
Regarding the offense. Coen calls the plays and is also responsible for substitutions along with the position coaches. His offense has a lot of motion and "eye candy" to get the defense to expose itself presnap. It also has a lot of subing. The pace is strictly part of Coen's design and he has spoken about this in pressers indicate that he is looking for ways to speed it up.
I realize Stoops is a lot of people's favorite target right now everything from offense pace to the price of tea in China, but those thoughts are without any basis or merit. Stoops is committed to modernizing the offense which is why he brought Coen in, in the first place. The offense is a work in progress and though it had it's issues, they still put up 10 PPG more than last season. Regardless of how many plays you run that's measurable progress.
Yeah it's amazing what an offense looks like when we catch the ball and limit penalties!Anti-Stoopers have gigged everything about the past season, some admittedly with good reason. But none have commented on the efficient offense of the last 2 games when UK actually looked like a different team. I'm looking forward to how the new plug and plays fit in.
Lol.Coen may be great for all I know, but I don't think Stoops wants anything but a run dominated 20 ppg offense. Which is it?
I agree with the passes being thrown to Brown.Lol.
You must have missed 2023.
We wasted dozens of downs trying to hit lengthy patterns to Barrion Brown, with the most efficient back in Stoops’ tenure being limited by the stress on passing.
And they put up 29 PPG averaging the fewest number of plays run in the Country just about. So something needs to be said for efficiency. I know talk is cheap but they have discussed upping the pace next season. I hope they stick to that.The information that is coming out indicates there was no riff between Stoops and Coen, he just wanted to test the NFL waters again to see what he was worth. My own take is when Stoops decided to interview with A&M Coen felt that gave him a free pass to do likewise.
Regarding the offense. Coen calls the plays and is also responsible for substitutions along with the position coaches. His offense has a lot of motion and "eye candy" to get the defense to expose itself presnap. It also has a lot of subing. The pace is strictly part of Coen's design and he has spoken about this in pressers indicate that he is looking for ways to speed it up.
I realize Stoops is a lot of people's favorite target right now everything from offense pace to the price of tea in China, but those thoughts are without any basis or merit. Stoops is committed to modernizing the offense which is why he brought Coen in, in the first place. The offense is a work in progress and though it had it's issues, they still put up 10 PPG more than last season. Regardless of how many plays you run that's measurable progress.
Consider the source. 🥜Again, there is no evidence Stoops accepted the TAM job. Why do you guys keep repeating this?
Actually from an article on TOS they indicated it'll be a while before a resolution is reached. Made the point that pro teams are very slow, methodical in their process.When will we have a final answer on the Coen question. I tend to think it will be soon
I'm still trying to figure out if interviewing Coen is even real. His history tells me they have to have better options.Actually from an article on TOS they indicated it'll be a while before a resolution is reached. Made the point that pro teams are very slow, methodical in their process.
And they put up 29 PPG averaging the fewest number of plays run in the Country just about. So something needs to be said for efficiency. I know talk is cheap but they have discussed upping the pace next season. I hope they stick to that.
Ranking 4 Chicago Bears offensive coordinators who have interviewed for the job
The Chicago Bears have interviewed four offensive coordinator candidates so far this offseason. All of them have a similar background, but they also come with vbeargoggleson.com
Felt the same way about Calipari 6-8 years ago....still waiting.I use to tolerate Stoops but I’m thinking it’s time for UK to look elsewhere.
Felt the same way about Calipari 6-8 years ago....still waiting.
Coen probably fed up with players making more$$$ than he does. Hell,
who knows, maybe the cheerleaders make more than he does.
That isn't stoops. It's all the long play calls, shifts, motions, then snaps. Later on his first year, he said he figured out all that was too much so he cut it out; and we took off. I assumed he would just pick up that adjustment immediately but he never did. Weird.
Thought it very interesting Saban said Michigan just lining up and going was a big issue for them. We do so much before the snap it's counterproductive. Line up, motion, go.
The information that is coming out indicates there was no riff between Stoops and Coen, he just wanted to test the NFL waters again to see what he was worth. My own take is when Stoops decided to interview with A&M Coen felt that gave him a free pass to do likewise.
Regarding the offense. Coen calls the plays and is also responsible for substitutions along with the position coaches. His offense has a lot of motion and "eye candy" to get the defense to expose itself presnap. It also has a lot of subing. The pace is strictly part of Coen's design and he has spoken about this in pressers indicate that he is looking for ways to speed it up.
I realize Stoops is a lot of people's favorite target right now everything from offense pace to the price of tea in China, but those thoughts are without any basis or merit. Stoops is committed to modernizing the offense which is why he brought Coen in, in the first place. The offense is a work in progress and though it had it's issues, they still put up 10 PPG more than last season. Regardless of how many plays you run that's measurable progress.
Been about 5 years for me, if I could choose one of the two to leave it would be Cal and it wouldn't be closeFelt the same way about Calipari 6-8 years ago....still waiting.
Thanks, I hadn't researched it at all. I hope he stays but it will be what it will be. I would like to see us keep the players we have on hand and keeping Coen probably gives us the best chance to do that.Actually from an article on TOS they indicated it'll be a while before a resolution is reached. Made the point that pro teams are very slow, methodical in their process.
Looks like they have plans for him.
Chicago Bears' Plans For Offensive Staff Reportedly Way Bolder That We Thought
Sometimes there is far more going on during interviews than people think. The Chicago Bears are proving that.www.sportsmockery.com
Pretty elaborate plan seems like. Does a NFL PGC make $1.7M? I mean, I don't know but it seems like a step down from a college OC. What's the old saying: "Too many cooks......."No way he leaves to be a “ pass game coordinator” under an actual OC. Is there? Nah. No way.
Switch it up once in a while, but by all means get their asses to the line right away and skip the 15 sec huddle.
Agreed. The shifts mainly caused motion penalties and having Oline in a stance is harder on themThat would definitely be a good changeup.
Imo we would've been fine without the shifts. Motions are majorly effective. I just don't see what shifts add when we motion 10 seconds later.
All the shifts do is cause the play call to be longer, make players remember more, gives more opportunity for presnap issues/penalties, and eats into OL because they're in a stance for several seconds.
I think it is obvious that Coen’s name is popping up for these different job openings for a reason...........An episode Wed that could've been a tip off on what's ahead. Marrow, Yenser and....White visited Kattus/Greene, 2 huge '25 recruits, OTs both and vital to the success of the '25 class. But not Coen. Why wouldn't your OC not visit such important recruits? I had been confident of Coen's return but my faith of that return has been shaken by Coen's absence of that event.