Good post, but I respectfully disagree.
Ware was averaging 10ppg before Altman cut his minutes. Did Onyenso score 10 points for the season?
I guess there are walk ons out there who played 30 seconds, grabbed a rebound and hit a shot whose per30 looks pretty good.
I usually (and there are exceptions) consider a player who plays more minutes to be the better prospect.
Based on what we actually saw on the basketball court, give me Ware.
But you make good points, I just don’t put as much stock in per30 and per40 stats as others do.
I did not see K.Ware play, so I cannot speak to that. Maybe he passes the 'eye test' better, IDK.
But I am probably best suited on this entire message board to interpret statistics.
Onyenso scored 40 points on the season, not a lot, but not "10".
I think per30min stats are more useful than per game stats,
to take into account PT disparity. And then stats like
shooting %'s are irrespective of PT. But another factor overall season totals (nor per30min stats) don't consider is the quality of the opponent (SEC > PAC12 >> mid-majors). And yes, over 70% of Onyenso's minutes came vs mid-majors.
per30min stats & shooting %
Onyenso 10.9 pt, 11.5 reb, 4.4 blk, 52.9% FG, 57.1% FT
K.Ware 12.6 pt, 7.7 reb, 2.4 blk, 45.7 FG%, 27.3% 3FG, 53.4% 2FG, 71.2 FT
(Onyenso only attempted 7 FTs, but I liked his form & with more shots I think that goes up near 70%)
So K.Ware may be a slightly better (& diverse) scorer, but Onyenso the much better rebounder, and better blocking shots. To me, K.Ware seems like another Collins, which is ok if we lose Collins to replace with K.Ware.
I'm guessing here, but guessing that Onyenso may be the better defender within 10' of the rim, but K.Ware the better defender away from the basket.