LOL. What that Boger dude doesn't understand is that if football goes to 4 super conferences of 60ish teams outside the ncaa....gt may not even make the list. They might have to stick with the old ncaa.Each sec member just received 51.8 million.
LOL. What that Boger dude doesn't understand is that if football goes to 4 super conferences of 60ish teams outside the ncaa....gt may not even make the list. They might have to stick with the old ncaa.Each sec member just received 51.8 million.
LOL. What that Boger dude doesn't understand is that if football goes to 4 super conferences of 60ish teams outside the ncaa....gt may not even make the list. They might have to stick with the old ncaa.
That's a rivalry game.... terrible point. GT only lost by 8 to uga... but GT also lost to Bowling Green by 10+. That's apple to oranges. There are 4-5 teams in the ACC that would regularly beat Kentucky just like the SEC does.
4-5 ACC teams? Talk about a credibility destroyer. Best to just ignore this clown completely.That's a rivalry game.... terrible point. GT only lost by 8 to uga... but GT also lost to Bowling Green by 10+. That's apple to oranges. There are 4-5 teams in the ACC that would regularly beat Kentucky just like the SEC does.
Would have to disagree with the 4 or 5 teams that would beat UK regularly. We would be very competitive with the Clemsons and FL St's. It takes rosters like AL and GA with lots of 4 and 5 stars to beat us 'regularly.' Plus, the speed in the SEC and ACC is no comparison. The top teams in SEC literally have twice the 4 and 5 stars we have. They have more total speed than us. I think our roster year in and year out would match up pretty well with most of the ACC teams.That's a rivalry game.... terrible point. GT only lost by 8 to uga... but GT also lost to Bowling Green by 10+. That's apple to oranges. There are 4-5 teams in the ACC that would regularly beat Kentucky just like the SEC does.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣That's a rivalry game.... terrible point. GT only lost by 8 to uga... but GT also lost to Bowling Green by 10+. That's apple to oranges. There are 4-5 teams in the ACC that would regularly beat Kentucky just like the SEC does.
Can we use $33 million of that to buy Cal out and get a real coach in here?Each sec member just received 51.8 million.
Can we use $33 million of that to buy Cal out and get a real coach in here?
The ACC had a winning head to head record vs the SEC. And don’t Kentucky lost to UGA 51-13?Any middle of the road sec school would easily be top 3 in the acc. The conference is such a joke the best team wants out and the rest will struggle to even stay afloat.
So congrats on keeping your coach. The entire program can enjoy another year in a league everyone knows is a joke and treats it as such
Well, what else are we using that money on? And UK basketball is a money maker by itself but won't be much longer if we don't get rid of the old, washed up guy we have in there now.Can we use $33 million of that to buy Cal out and get a real coach in here?
That kind of makes his point. Most of those losses were top ACC teams and bottom SEC teams.The ACC had a winning head to head record vs the SEC. And don’t Kentucky lost to UGA 51-13?
Yep. 2 wins by ranked teams vs SC, 1 FSU vs UF (both teams playing without their qbs), 1 vs Vandy. Solid wins were FSU over LSU, since they rebounded some with the portal this season, and Miami over TAMU a team that did make a bowl but underperformed so badly they paid a coach 50 mil to leave.The ACC had a winning head to head record vs the SEC. And don’t Kentucky lost to UGA 51-13?
That kind of makes his point. Most of those losses were top ACC teams and bottom SEC teams.
You clearly want to project superiority over UK.... I think UK is superior to MTSU. You know what i don't do? I don't go to the MTSU message board and try to talk smack. I don't even care about GT but at this point I will actually cheer for UL to beat you guys.The ACC had a winning head to head record vs the SEC. And don’t Kentucky lost to UGA 51-13?