ADVERTISEMENT

Bart Torvik's projected stats for UK's 24-25 team

Smashcat

All-American
Gold Member
Mar 13, 2012
75,153
110,351
113
Interesting. Not bad but he's quite bearish on Amari Williams. Hope he's wrong there.



.
Image-9-4-24-at-7-15-PM.jpg
 
Robinson 13ppg
Carr 12ppg
Williams 10ppg
Brea 10ppg
Oweh 9ppg
Butler 8ppg
Kriisa 7ppg
Garrison 6ppg
Almonor 4ppg
Chandler 4ppg
Perry 2ppg
Noah 1ppg
 
Interesting. Not bad but he's quite bearish on Amari Williams. Hope he's wrong there.



.
Image-9-4-24-at-7-15-PM.jpg

I hate to pick this apart. But:

- has either of our C's only playing 1/2 the game (51%); in fact he has 27mpg with either Robinson or Oweh or Chandler playing the PF/4.
- has Garrison playing > 2X Williams, Williams only 6mpg when most of us expect him to start & play at least 20mpg
- Almonor and Noah are missing. Noah mpg may be low like Perry. But Almonor is our only backup PF so should play some.
- I think his minutes for Carr (32.4), Kriisa (27.6) & Chandler (11.6) may each be 3-5mpg high, and
 
Since we have no real superstar I could see 5-6 averaging double figures and on any giving night someone different going off.
 
Gary Parrish and Matt Norlander mentioned this. After listening to them, Parrish made some pretty good points about why Kentucky shouldn't be ranked. Namely, that all teams who took more than 7 transfers last season (except NCSU) were pretty much duds last season.

Obviously, Kentucky is an extreme scenario this season when it comes to transfers, but my expectations are tempered. Just so many new guys on same roster.
 
Gary Parrish and Matt Norlander mentioned this. After listening to them, Parrish made some pretty good points about why Kentucky shouldn't be ranked. Namely, that all teams who took more than 7 transfers last season (except NCSU) were pretty much duds last season.

Obviously, Kentucky is an extreme scenario this season when it comes to transfers, but my expectations are tempered. Just so many new guys on same roster.
Did they list all of the schools who took seven or more players? I'm interested to see the type of players those schools had v. the players we have acquired.
 
I hate to pick this apart. But:

- has either of our C's only playing 1/2 the game (51%); in fact he has 27mpg with either Robinson or Oweh or Chandler playing the PF/4.
- has Garrison playing > 2X Williams, Williams only 6mpg when most of us expect him to start & play at least 20mpg
- Almonor and Noah are missing. Noah mpg may be low like Perry. But Almonor is our only backup PF so should play some.
- I think his minutes for Carr (32.4), Kriisa (27.6) & Chandler (11.6) may each be 3-5mpg high, and
It looks like he only projects what he expects to be the top ten contributors. I think this is purely a statistical projection based on whatever variables he uses and he isn’t making adjustments from that. I’ve read that his system is low on Almonor because of the average quality of opponent he played against. The same thing probably applies to Williams compared to Garrison.
 
Gary Parrish and Matt Norlander mentioned this. After listening to them, Parrish made some pretty good points about why Kentucky shouldn't be ranked. Namely, that all teams who took more than 7 transfers last season (except NCSU) were pretty much duds last season.

Obviously, Kentucky is an extreme scenario this season when it comes to transfers, but my expectations are tempered. Just so many new guys on same roster.
I found the list of schools who had 7+ transfers last season:

Arkansas (7 transfers): 16-17 (6-12)
Memphis (10 transfers): 22-10 (11-7)
Arizona St. (7 transfers): 14-18 (8-12)
UCF (7 transfers): 17-16 (7-11) *First year in the Big 12
West Virginia (10 transfers): 9-23 (4-14)
Penn St. (9 transfers): 16-17 (9-11)
St. Johns (9 transfers): 20-13 (11-9)
NC State (7 transfers): 26-15 (9-11)

Only four teams had winning records, and only two with in-conference winning records. NC State was the lone exception to a bad season, making it to the Final Four.
 
  • Like
Reactions: true blue1
I found the list of schools who had 7+ transfers last season:

Arkansas (7 transfers): 16-17 (6-12)
Memphis (10 transfers): 22-10 (11-7)
Arizona St. (7 transfers): 14-18 (8-12)
UCF (7 transfers): 17-16 (7-11) *First year in the Big 12
West Virginia (10 transfers): 9-23 (4-14)
Penn St. (9 transfers): 16-17 (9-11)
St. Johns (9 transfers): 20-13 (11-9)
NC State (7 transfers): 26-15 (9-11)

Only four teams had winning records, and only two with in-conference winning records. NC State was the lone exception to a bad season, making it to the Final Four.
Excellent stats! Great work.

I think we will fall somewhere around where St. John’s ended up last season record wise.

Our team is probably better than St. John’s was last season, but I think the SEC is going to be much tougher than the Big East.

20 wins in the regular season. 10-8 in conference. Probably make the tourney and make a little run in the NCAA tourney. Sweet Sixteen maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: true blue1
It looks like he only projects what he expects to be the top ten contributors. I think this is purely a statistical projection based on whatever variables he uses and he isn’t making adjustments from that. I’ve read that his system is low on Almonor because of the average quality of opponent he played against. The same thing probably applies to Williams compared to Garrison.
Then did he think Nelson would do nothing at Alabama last year, or that Schierman would have done nothing at Creighton 2 years ago. I'm not saying Williams is comparable (impactwise) to those 2, but I don't think he's that far behind. He has the size of a high-major C, and he was Defensive POY in his conference. As for Almonor, I get it. He is short (6'7) for his position. I think though he will have to play some (more than the FR) simply because we only have 4 guys (him being 1 of them) who can play the 5 or 4 spots, and I don't see Pope the type to play a guy (Carr) 35mpg.

And I do understand statistical projections, I am a Statistician. But good statistical projections should take into account position minutes.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT