Good. UK cannot afford to be held hostage by a single player as they were last year.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Probably accurate and this is a potential game changer in the sense UK is going to offer other guys and not be held hostage to one guy trying to figure out what he's going to do. More than any other position, it's important to lock up a QB as early as possible. I still think UK is in the lead for Kendall but the longer it goes past spring practice the less confident I'll be we get him.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
We still lead for Kendall after his OU visit.
This may be theor get off the pot move.
UK has an advantage with AK over everyone else, his brother is at UK and on the team as a walkon. Their disadvantage is the offense isn't what he is looking for, or wasn't a year ago I don't know now, and that is causing the hesitation with him. If UK is all in with him for the qb in this class, then seal it with giving his brother a scholarship. It goes on everywhere. He is mobile enough to play in a spread like UK wants to run, but not Auburn. Would allow mom and dad to visit both boys at the same time not to mention whatever out of state tuition is at UK, and down the road it would allow his brother to say he was a scholarshipped SEC football player. UGA has closed more than one recruitment like this over the years. Heck we have a 2nd string long snapper on scholarship right now.Originally posted by KapitalCat:
Probably accurate and this is a potential game changer in the sense UK is going to offer other guys and not be held hostage to one guy trying to figure out what he's going to do. More than any other position, it's important to lock up a QB as early as possible. I still think UK is in the lead for Kendall but the longer it goes past spring practice the less confident I'll be we get him.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
We still lead for Kendall after his OU visit.
This may be theor get off the pot move.
I'm pretty sure preferred walk-ons can't be granted a scholarship until they have been here two years. Kendall's brother is just a freshmen.Originally posted by Grumpyolddawg:
If UK is all in with him for the qb in this class, then seal it with giving his brother a scholarship. It goes on everywhere.
especially since he said we still lead after the ou visit. if riley is moderately successful, he's gone in 2 years for a head coaching job. i hope he's not going there for lincoln!Originally posted by Grumpyolddawg:
Surely AK is smart enough to know AU is lying to him about changing their offense for him. Gus has run the same offense when he was coaching HS football in Arkansas, tried to run it at Arkansas which led to the downfall of him and Nutt when Nutt tried to change him. Run it with Cam and at the school he was at prior to returning to AU. I think once he gets home and thinks it over he will realize that.
As for as OU goes, I said earlier its crucial for UK to show their QB isn't going to run the ball as much as Towles did last year. Regardless of where he commits he isn't official until he enrolls or signs the LOI. But surprising he has OU that high so quickly.
Originally posted by hmt5000:
especially since he said we still lead after the ou visit. if riley is moderately successful, he's gone in 2 years for a head coaching job. i hope he's not going there for lincoln!
Agree. I have never understood the logic. Kendall's brother is already at Kentucky. If playing with his brother is important to him, Kendall can do that by signing with Kentucky, whether or not his brother is on scholarship. But if the brother is put on scholarship and then Kendall goes elsewhere, Stoops looks gullible and there is 1 less scholarship. Apparently, playing with the brother isn't much of a draw since Kendall is close to committing to Oklahoma or Auburn now. And if anyone thinks Gus is out of the race for Kendall, then they haven't been watching SEC recruiting long.Originally posted by Poetax:
Do that and its egg in the face for the rest of the season if he goes elsewhere.
agreed but we were in it with him with brown and dawson so he seemed to like the school and stoops whole staff and the commitment to the air raid. i think we can agree that the stoops family is gonna have a weird family reunion after this though... thats like 5 guys bobs gone after that we were in on.Originally posted by mrschwump:
Originally posted by hmt5000:
especially since he said we still lead after the ou visit. if riley is moderately successful, he's gone in 2 years for a head coaching job. i hope he's not going there for lincoln!
Re Riley and a HC job, the same could be said about Dawson. If UK can win games and the O puts up good numbers Dawson has a HC job in 2-3 years. Just the way this game works.
Sure there is that risk, but it isn't like signing a HS kid, he is already at UK and it wouldn't be like a HS kid signing his papers pubically. I guess you have to weigh the pros and cons, is it worth signing what is potentially a program changing qb against the con of having a kid on scholarship who might never contribute. There is probably 15-20 of those today. Just my opinion, I would want the staff to play every card they could to sign him. But I can see your side of it too.Originally posted by Poetax:
Do that and its egg in the face for the rest of the season if he goes elsewhere.
Yes its by default, since Jan 1 Bama has lost Jones to dismisal, Tenpenny to transfer and Scarbourgh to injury while Drake is coming off a pretty bad broken leg and is getting a look at WR. What looked like tremendous depth is now pretty thin. You are right about Saban liking the big backs, he now has 1 of those on the roster in Henry, Drake coming off that bad break and the frosh RB as scholarship backs.Originally posted by jauk11:
Not sure what RB you are talking about but I think Scarborough would have definitely been ahead of him, also a five star, much bigger RB, (which Saban seems to prefer) and with a spring practice ahead of him. If he is the #2 RB it seems like it will be by default, it will be interesting to see if he can handle it. I think Boom will probably have a better year.
Totally agree with this part. Part of the reason for our struggles in recruiting QBs right now is that our mantra that we air it out has been hot air so far. If we want to get good QBs we need to show that we can develop one. 3rd and long your goto play can't be a QB draw. Not if you want to recruit the best QBs.Originally posted by Grumpyolddawg:
As for as OU goes, I said earlier its crucial for UK to show their QB isn't going to run the ball as much as Towles did last year. Regardless of where he commits he isn't official until he enrolls or signs the LOI. But surprising he has OU that high so quickly.
Grump, I get your angle and if we were GA, I would agree but until we win on the field decisions like that going wrong could kill us.Originally posted by Grumpyolddawg:
Sure there is that risk, but it isn't like signing a HS kid, he is already at UK and it wouldn't be like a HS kid signing his papers pubically. I guess you have to weigh the pros and cons, is it worth signing what is potentially a program changing qb against the con of having a kid on scholarship who might never contribute. There is probably 15-20 of those today. Just my opinion, I would want the staff to play every card they could to sign him. But I can see your side of it too.Originally posted by Poetax:
Do that and its egg in the face for the rest of the season if he goes elsewhere.
Maybe so Poet, but UK hasn't have a lot of recent success on the field, offering AK a scholarship that everyone else is doing isn't all in, its just calling. So what if the brother never steps foot on the field, only about 65 guys ever do anyway and the only ones who would whine are the fans who come in 2nd, no one else will ever even know. I just never looked at it as egg in the face if he went elsewhere, I saw it as the staff not doing everything they could to get a kid, within the rules if they didn't. Only a few places have kids falling over themselves to commit, UGA and UK aren't in that group. UK basketball is, Bama football is and they are the only programs I can think of quickly.Originally posted by Poetax:
Grump, I get your angle and if we were GA, I would agree but until we win on the field decisions like that going wrong could kill us.Originally posted by Grumpyolddawg:
Sure there is that risk, but it isn't like signing a HS kid, he is already at UK and it wouldn't be like a HS kid signing his papers pubically. I guess you have to weigh the pros and cons, is it worth signing what is potentially a program changing qb against the con of having a kid on scholarship who might never contribute. There is probably 15-20 of those today. Just my opinion, I would want the staff to play every card they could to sign him. But I can see your side of it too.Originally posted by Poetax:
Do that and its egg in the face for the rest of the season if he goes elsewhere.