ADVERTISEMENT

Alec Baldwin - UPDATE

Status
Not open for further replies.
As a follow up to my earlier post, NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY that has ever handled a gun, is going to pass a pistol that is already cocked to someone else. (unless they're coaxing an execution etc. and even THEN, it's a stretch) And that goes triple, for a person that is responsible for firearm safety in a controlled environment like a movie set.

If they did, they'd never work again.
 
His name is Alec...enough said. That has to be the douchiest sounding name that I've ever heard.
I saw a list the other day of the douchiest mens names. I think it went something like this.

1. Donald
2. Don Jr
3. Eric
4. Barron
5. Alec
 
It's just gonna make me wonder if he even cares that he killed someone. I really don't think he does, and don't understand how a perpetrator gets to give an interview that would taint any potential jury pool before a trial.

What I would like to see is that they move the trial outside of Calipornia or NewHorkCity to a place where people know guns don't kill people. That's a trial I want to watch. He can spout all the nonsense he wants in Texas, Montana, or Idaho and think he has the jury won over until they practice knot tying in court during closing arguments.
Did I miss where he was charged with a crime?
 
It's just gonna make me wonder if he even cares that he killed someone. I really don't think he does, and don't understand how a perpetrator gets to give an interview that would taint any potential jury pool before a trial.

What I would like to see is that they move the trial outside of Calipornia or NewHorkCity to a place where people know guns don't kill people. That's a trial I want to watch. He can spout all the nonsense he wants in Texas, Montana, or Idaho and think he has the jury won over until they practice knot tying in court during closing arguments.

It happened in New Mexico so I doubt California or New York would be considered
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ed323232
The killer (i.e. Alec Baldwin) may NOT have pulled the trigger as he suggests...

Crazy, I know...

If you partially pull the trigger back without fully cocking, and LET GO, it will snap back in place and discharge the weapon...

So,

He MAY be telling the truth, but is even more at fault because he is just trying to obfuscate his culpability...
 
Well I don’t own guns or shoot guns so not exactly. I can separate a man playing a roll on a tv show from him as a real person. Most of you can’t.
If you didn't own a car but someone drove their car through a parade killing 6 and injuring 50.... you could still see it was intentional though, right?

This kind of pistol doesn't just "go off".
 
All I've got in single action are a couple of .22's. My GAS is now kicking in for a .45LC.

Trying to decide if I should get a Colt SAA or settle for an Italian clone. Anybody have an opinion?
 
All I've got in single action are a couple of .22's. My GAS is now kicking in for a .45LC.

Trying to decide if I should get a Colt SAA or settle for an Italian clone. Anybody have an opinion?
Hold them both and see which one makes you feel more manly.
 
So all politics and bullshit aside...what are we accusing Baldwin of doing? Obviously, he was holding a gun that went off and killed someone. That's not in doubt. Are we arguing that it was intentional and he should be charged with murder? Or are we arguing that it was negligent and he should be charged with either manslaughter or reckless endangerment? Or are we just saying we don't like him because he can be douchey and we are reveling in his situation? Just trying to get a better understanding of what we're discussing here. Thanks in advance.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Girthang
Guns don't "go off" and he's admitted to holding it/being the shooter.

I wasn't there, and don't know if he actually shot anyone. No one here knows anything except what they're told happened. JUST like you, so no one here is "accusing" him of anything. He's already admitted to being responsible, but he has yet to take responsibility. Like you, he's still blaming the gun.
 
So all politics and bullshit aside...what are we accusing Baldwin of doing? Obviously, he was holding a gun that went off and killed someone. That's not in doubt. Are we arguing that it was intentional and he should be charged with murder? Or are we arguing that it was negligent and he should be charged with either manslaughter or reckless endangerment? Or are we just saying we don't like him because he can be douchey and we are reveling in his situation? Just trying to get a better understanding of what we're discussing here. Thanks in advance.
You know exactly what this is about.
 
So all politics and bullshit aside...what are we accusing Baldwin of doing? Obviously, he was holding a gun that went off and killed someone. That's not in doubt. Are we arguing that it was intentional and he should be charged with murder? Or are we arguing that it was negligent and he should be charged with either manslaughter or reckless endangerment? Or are we just saying we don't like him because he can be douchey and we are reveling in his situation? Just trying to get a better understanding of what we're discussing here. Thanks in advance.
I don't think anyone could argue it was premeditated and thus he shouldn't be charged with 1st degree murder. He can and should be charged for manslaughter for his reckless behavior in pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger regardless of it being on a movie set or a prop gun.
 
I don't think anyone could argue it was premeditated and thus he shouldn't be charged with 1st degree murder. He can and should be charged for manslaughter for his reckless behavior in pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger regardless of it being on a movie set or a prop gun.
And he ridiculed orange Jesus so charge him with that too.
 
And he ridiculed orange Jesus so charge him with that too.
Has Baldwin blamed Trump yet? Might as well, the scumbag has blamed everybody else including the victim for his own negligence. "Liberals" could use the allegation to investigate, produce "distinguished journalism", and make radical morons like you happy. Maybe even award a few Pulitzers like they did for Russia Collusion bullshit.
 
Has Baldwin blamed Trump yet? Might as well, the scumbag has blamed everybody else including the victim for his own negligence. "Liberals" could use the allegation to investigate, produce "distinguished journalism", and make radical morons like you happy. Maybe even award a few Pulitzers like they did for Russia Collusion bullshit.
Trumps been busy. He was recently identified by Epstein’s pilot. Shocking
 
More like jail time for orange Jesus.
Yeah. You morons have been saying that since he walked down the escalator. Everything you blamed him for you were always doing yourselves. It's the scumbag demorat Saul Alinsky way!

EfZz5xkUEAAZfXv.png


hillary-alinsky.jpg
 
And he ridiculed orange Jesus so charge him with that too.
Well, then, he certainly could not possibly be charged with reckless homicide! He needs to be canonized as soon as he dies. We must remember what is important. Why are we concerned about some poor woman shot dead in her prime by an thespian with a loaded gun?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT