2017 No. 1 DeAndre Ayton Says top 3 are UK, Dook, KU

[Smashcat]

Adam Zagoria ‏@AdamZagoria 3h3 hours ago

DeAndre Ayton, No. 1 in 2017, Says Kentucky, Duke, Kansas Are Top 3 https://www.sny.tv/college-recruiting/news/deandre-ayton-no-1-in-2017-says-kentucky-duke-kansas-are-top-3/159555238?tcid=tw_article_159555238… @RealDeandreAy

Kentucky head coach John Calipari and assistant Kenny Payne sat courtside to watch Ayton and fellow 2017 star Jarred Vanderbilt following their win Saturday over Arizona State.

"I noticed them as soon as I came out of the game," he said. "I was like, 'Wow.' It was unbelievable."

Last June, Ayton told SNY.tv he wanted to model his game after former Kentucky star Karl-Anthony Towns, the No. 1 pick in this year's NBA Draft

 

[throatpoker]

interesting how no one uses the recruiting forum....

 

[mebeblue2]

interesting how no one uses the recruiting forum....

never heard of it

 

[Smashcat]

interesting how no one uses the recruiting forum....

You can use it all you want.

 

[Jazzycat]

Come on down! The guy is a beast! Hope he chooses UK...

 

[brianpoe]

interesting how no one uses the recruiting forum....

What? Of course we do, to look back at the "experts" on here tell us who we are going to get, who is better than who and all that fun stuff... "The Davis kid is too skinny to make an impact"

 

[SosaUK]

never heard of it

Dammit. Beat me to it.


Also, sign. Him. Up.

 

[KnowsAllTellsAll]

I thought I read somewhere that Ayton will never play a day of college basketball?

 

[brianpoe]

I thought I read somewhere that Ayton will never play a day of college basketball?

For Kansas..

 

[KnowsAllTellsAll]

For Kansas..

I have zero aspirations that if he does play college basketball it will be at Kansas. It will most likely be at Kentucky or Duke. But I am certain I've read somewhere that these gurus don't expect him to play in college.

 

[Jkwo]

I have zero aspirations that if he does play college basketball it will be at Kansas. It will most likely be at Kentucky or Duke.

Oh, c'mon. That's no fun. Bring back the guy who predicts every last recruit to KU.

 

[Fitch44]

If he aims to be the 3 pick at best he will pick splinter.

 

[CUT-NETS]

If he aims to be the 3 pick at best he will pick splinter.

Or if he wants to win the title

 

[Clive Gollings]

It's funny to watch trolls openly root for other coaches.

 

[michaeluk26]

Or if he wants to win the title

You are literally the worst poster I've ever seen on here. All you do is post negative bullshit.

 

[CUT-NETS]

You are literally the worst poster I've ever seen on here. All you do is post negative bullshit.

And you slurp it up consistently. Thank you.

By the way, i don't post negative bs. I have a contrarian view that doesn't fall in line with the masses and you can't stand it.

 

[Fitch44]

Jabari Parker, Irving and rivers say hello.

 

[KnowsAllTellsAll]

Oh, c'mon. That's no fun. Bring back the guy who predicts every last recruit to KU.

Ayton to Kansas! You heard it here first!

 

[JerseyCat84]

Oh, c'mon. That's no fun. Bring back the guy who predicts every last recruit to KU.

And it has to be a package deal with someone else lol

 

[Son_Of_Saul]

Or if he wants to win the title

Coach K is batting 3 for 11 on getting past the Sweet Sixteen in the last 11 years.

The worst part about your act is that you don't even make a good argument. Your arguments are like a poorly written Oliver Stone film - just with more whining and exponentially worse acting.

 

[Son_Of_Saul]

Ayton to Kansas! You heard it here first!

Kansas fans across the world approve this message. Here are some of them now...

 

[Son_Of_Saul]

And you slurp it up consistently. Thank you.

By the way, i don't post negative bs. I have a contrarian view that doesn't fall in line with the masses and you can't stand it.

Nah; people can't stand it because you make a weak argument. You didn't point to Coach K until last spring. Now, in pointing to him after his title, you ignore his multiple season failures in the early rounds in '11, '12, and '14, and the absolute arse-kickings he endured in the '05-'09 NCAA tournaments.

That's why people can't stand your view. Your argument is weak, ill-thought, and rhetorical at this point. Your whole approach is like a bad political filibuster.

 

[JohnBlue_]

And you slurp it up consistently. Thank you.

By the way, i don't post negative bs. I have a contrarian view that doesn't fall in line with the masses and you can't stand it.

You're agenda posting and it's getting to the point where we are going to have to uninvite you from the site if it continues. Not what we want but we have a obligation to others to allow discussion without someone repeating the same rhetoric in attempt get a rise out of others.

 

[Bobcat94]

You're agenda posting and it's getting to the point where we are going to have to uninvite you from the site if it continues. Not what we want but we have a obligation to others to allow discussion without someone repeating the same rhetoric in attempt get a rise out of others.

Thank you very much for this.

 

[CharlieT71059]

We keep getting the good ones

 

[Hoskins21]

It must be @CUT-NETS because I can't see her posts. Yes, please get rid of her.

 

[CUT-NETS]

You're agenda posting and it's getting to the point where we are going to have to uninvite you from the site if it continues. Not what we want but we have a obligation to others to allow discussion without someone repeating the same rhetoric in attempt get a rise out of others.

If you ban me you'll need to ban many others. At any rate, this is good posturing by you and I'm sure it will please many to see that a moderator has put the proverbial foot down. My "rhetoric" may be the same argument but its not negative, just a matter of opinion that happens to differ from the masses. Because it is so different it is met with animosity, but make no mistake its not negative. Ive never said these players suck and Coach Cal sucks and UK sucks, etc etc. If pointing out my perceived flaws of a coach or my opinion of what is "remarkable" and "not remarkable" is negative then that's your opinion. If this site doesn't want a contrarian view then what's the point of discussion. I don't call anyone names or use bad language in my posts. I simply have a differing opinion.

 

[Bobcat94]

If you ban me you'll need to ban many others. At any rate, this is good posturing by you and I'm sure it will please many to see that a moderator has put the proverbial foot down. My "rhetoric" may be the same argument but its not negative, just a matter of opinion that happens to differ from the masses. Because it is so different it is met with animosity, but make no mistake its not negative. Ive never said these players suck and Coach Cal sucks and UK sucks, etc etc. If pointing out my perceived flaws of a coach or my opinion of what is "remarkable" and "not remarkable" is negative then that's your opinion. If this site doesn't want a contrarian view then what's the point of discussion. I don't call anyone names or use bad language in my posts. I simply have a differing opinion.

I don't think anyone minds a point of view that differs, but the overwhelming need to continuously add your negativity to every post is a little overboard. We get it you don't like Calipari. This is a board we pay as fans to hear all things related about the best program in all of college basketball and we shouldn't have to worry about someone who poses as our own continuously bating and berating the program and coach we love and are grateful for. I for one don't pay my hard earned money to listen to your constant bckering. Are you sure your not my ex-wife lol???

 

[Clive Gollings]

If you ban me you'll need to ban many others. At any rate, this is good posturing by you and I'm sure it will please many to see that a moderator has put the proverbial foot down. My "rhetoric" may be the same argument but its not negative, just a matter of opinion that happens to differ from the masses. Because it is so different it is met with animosity, but make no mistake its not negative. Ive never said these players suck and Coach Cal sucks and UK sucks, etc etc. If pointing out my perceived flaws of a coach or my opinion of what is "remarkable" and "not remarkable" is negative then that's your opinion. If this site doesn't want a contrarian view then what's the point of discussion. I don't call anyone names or use bad language in my posts. I simply have a differing opinion.

To be fair you do hijack posts that have nothing to do with Calipari. But anyway, it's nice to see you get slapped on the wrist. I'll just go ahead and put you on ignore now.

 

[BlueBomb]

Don't ban the poster. Just ignore. I don't like censorship.

 

[kentucky_wildcat_#1]

Don't ban the poster. Just ignore. I don't like censorship.

I'm just glad something is finally being done to stop posters like this one from hijacking every thread with his bs. The bad thing is, even the poster doesn't believe the bs he/she wants us to believe. When that happens, it's just a waste of everyone's time. If you don't believe it yourself, how in the world are you supposed to make other's believe it?? You can't. With this warning, maybe this poster will stop and the great thing, if she/he doesn't, he/she will get the boot and we all will be better for it.