ADVERTISEMENT

Duke is a Juggernaut!

Make no mistake, the refs awarded duke 6 bullshit points as well. The two fouls on 3 point shots weren’t fouls. The second one undoubtedly was clean.
No doubt they had a lot of 8 vs 5 help that game. That’s what makes that 77-72 victory that much sweeter knowing we have a COACH and a TEAM that can over come that bias BS!

Barnhart comments and praise for Pope

Not to mention Mitch is the athletics director who is responsible for the entire department. Top to bottom, that department is the best it has ever been. Stoops is the most successful coach the football program has ever had with results most fans never thought possible. It’s easy to look back and question Cal’s contract now but at the time (using the information at that time) that contract was also the right decision. No one would have ever imagined Cal would lose it like he did. Hindsight is great but you have to remember what was actually going on when decisions get made.
I agree that Barnhart appears to have been a really good athletic director for UK in other ways. But in my opinion, the “lifetime” contracts were a terrible decision even in the moment, not just in hindsight. They still are whether your name is Calipari, Stoops or Saban – or Pope. Agreeing to this was/is a very short-sighted and emotionally driven decision – something one might expect of a jock-turned-athletic-director of the past, but not acceptable for someone being paid seven figures to run a huge college sports department today. You have to be smarter and have more foresight than that.

Pay a premium currently if necessary, or figure out other inducements that make a coach want to stay. But to tie your hands long-term like that is an obvious mistake regardless of how “hot” a coach is or his threat to leave for another program.

For the Basketball Bennies out there...

I’m straight up nitpicking here but the rotation is too big. Stupid statement on my part because it is working out.. just feel like we would be even more efficient if the rotation was reduced.. in the event of injury, should be easier to introduce a next man up since most everyone is getting playing time though.
I think you’re wrong. Dook was gassed at the end. Having a longer bench will likely reduce in game fatigue as well as injury probability. Bench can always be shortened later
Definitely a breath of fresh air.

However, I can only imagine BBNs collective response if the inbounds pass flew over Butler's head and landed out of bounds. Duke would have gotten the ball right underneath their own hoop with 6 sec (or something like that) and only down 2.

Glad it worked out, but that is one of those high risk high, reward plays. No doubt UK has practiced it enough if Pope feels comfortable enough to run it at the end of a big game. But man, not sure if I would have had the stones to call that.
geez, maybe they shouldn’t take shots because they might miss or play defense because they might foul. I can only wonder how the fan base might respond if those things happen.

WOW !!! SUMRALL and tulane drills navy

He does not ha
I’ll throw out an answer. First, some posters immediately talk about “fans settling for mediocrity” anytime football history is mentioned. This answer includes history, but it also includes logic.

UK does not have ANY history of football success in the last 75 years, except for Stoops’ success. Think about that for a second. In paper, Stoops guided us to our “golden period.”

College football has been dominated by the same 10-15 programs for the last 40 years. Someone will sneak into the list for a year, or maybe two, but they don’t last. (Ex - TCU)

Our conference (and thus our schedule) consists of 4-5 teams every year that have won a championship game in the last 25 years.

Our conference makes up about 70-75% of those programs that have dominated football in the last 25 years. Obviously, they haven’t all dominated at the same time. (Exs- Florida and Auburn).

Those are historical facts regardless of one’s fandom. Now, I do believe the NIL/transfer portal IS going to open up doors for more teams to break through glass ceilings. Teams that break through those ceilings may not be able to maintain a level of being a top program for the very reasons that helped them break through them in the first place.

I do believe UK can be one of those programs!!! But, doing it in the ACC will be much, much easier. Avoiding OSU and a couple top B10 teams will make it easier than UK.

Let’s face reality. Turing around the Florida, Aub, Tx, or UT should be much easier than UK.

I applaud Stoops for his accomplishments at UK. I honestly don’t know if he’s the man for the future. My question is not his ability but the energy needed to do everything that needs to be done to make UK better. He looks tired to me.
I’ll throw out an answer. First, some posters immediately talk about “fans settling for mediocrity” anytime football history is mentioned. This answer includes history, but it also includes logic.

UK does not have ANY history of football success in the last 75 years, except for Stoops’ success. Think about that for a second. In paper, Stoops guided us to our “golden period.”

College football has been dominated by the same 10-15 programs for the last 40 years. Someone will sneak into the list for a year, or maybe two, but they don’t last. (Ex - TCU)

Our conference (and thus our schedule) consists of 4-5 teams every year that have won a championship game in the last 25 years.

Our conference makes up about 70-75% of those programs that have dominated football in the last 25 years. Obviously, they haven’t all dominated at the same time. (Exs- Florida and Auburn).

Those are historical facts regardless of one’s fandom. Now, I do believe the NIL/transfer portal IS going to open up doors for more teams to break through glass ceilings. Teams that break through those ceilings may not be able to maintain a level of being a top program for the very reasons that helped them break through them in the first place.

I do believe UK can be one of those programs!!! But, doing it in the ACC will be much, much easier. Avoiding OSU and a couple top B10 teams will make it easier than UK.

Let’s face reality. Turing around the Florida, Aub, Tx, or UT should be much easier than UK.

I applaud Stoops for his accomplishments at UK. I honestly don’t know if he’s the man for the future. My question is not his ability but the energy needed to do everything that needs to be done to make UK better. He looks tired to me.
He doesn’t have the ability. There, I answered it for you.
  • Like
Reactions: BigBlue1992

WOW !!! SUMRALL and tulane drills navy

So you don’t think we can get anybody better for 9 million? And by better I’m talking winning 8-9 games a year, a consistent top 25 team, and maybe running an offense that isn’t from 1970. I’m saying we most definitely can.

I never said we couldn't. My original post is what barney is thinking. I couldn't care less if Stoops is fired. I'd rather have anyone. We aren't gonna win 8 to 9 games a year though. Sec is too tough.

Very Real Scenario Regarding Sumrall (Bad)

It won’t surprise me at all if Stoops stays another year just because he has no other options and doesn’t have anything else to do. Meanwhile a bigger school hires Sumrall and UK will have missed its chance.

Personally, Id love IU’s Cignetti but he just got an extension that doubled his pay so that’s probably out the window. But he would seems to be a lock to turn your program into a title contender based on what he’s done everywhere he goes. Sumrall would be my close second choice though. I can only imagine how pissed BBN would be if Jon gets hired somewhere else because Stoops doesn’t leave.
Why would cignetti leave iu to come to UK? Easier conference to make the playoffs and UK isn't exactly that much of a step up.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT