,
Honestly, I don't know how anyone who watched the players you're talking about would post what you just posted. The reason people don't say the same things about Bledsoe/Teague is not because of supporting cast, it's because they were entirely different types of players who did not have the same flaws as Goodwin.
I'll concede Teague had his own flaws, but stylistically he was virtually the opposite type guard as Goodwin. Teague was a true point first and foremost committed to defense and passing, he did not seem interested in how many points he scored, and never remotely looked selfish. Hell, if anything, one of Teague's early problems was that he did not assert himself enough offensively (which he finally did change when he began looking to score more during the tourney run). Conversely, Goodwin played like a wild eyed gunner who often seemed WAY too concerned about his own points over everything else, and often seemed completely blind to his wide open teammates.
And let's ease up on the exaggeration about Goodwin's supporting cast. I might remind you that team began the season ranked No. 3 in the nation and had more 5 star McD All Americans than any other team in the country (other than maybe Duke, as I recall). That season was miserable because of factors like poor chemistry, off court issues, soft ass defense, immature (and often seemingly selfish)guard play, and injury (see Noel), but NOT because of lack of raw talent.