Would you rather pitch a Perfect Game or win a World Series?

[HeismaNole]

On a bit of a baseball movie kick lately watching Field of Dreams, For Love of the Game, and Moneyball on Peacock. It got me thinking what would be the more desired accomplishment?

Personally, I’d go with the Perfect Game. There’s been what? Only like 20 people to ever do that? Most times, people couldn’t tell you who won the World Series three years prior. So, I’d take an average career with one Perfect Game over a ring.

You?

 

[J_Dee]

In 150+ years of Major League Baseball (238,500+ games), a perfect game's only been achieved 24 times -- 22 since the modern era began in the early 1900s. Cy Young threw the first perfect game under modern rules, in the deadball era, in 1904.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cy_Young's_perfect_game

It's one of the rarest accomplishments in all of sports, so that's what I'd go with.

 

[UKWildcats1987]

I care more about winning and team success than personal so give me world series.

 

[Blueisbest]

While pitching a perfect game is an awesome achievement only accomplished by a handful of people, winning a World Series is a feat that makes you praised by your teammates and your entire fan base.

 

[Stan the caddy]

I’d wager to say nearly a thousand pitchers have rings. Only a couple dozen have perfectos. Easy choice here.

 

[Col. Angus]

Don’t get no rang for any perfect game.

Gimme that rang.

 

[*CatinIL*]

 

[JonathanW]

While pitching a perfect game is an awesome achievement only accomplished by a handful of people, winning a World Series is a feat that makes you praised by your teammates and your entire fan base.

Personally, I don't care about praise by others. Only from within, did I do well. Team success is very important to me.
Had the OP not said "you were a starter" for the WS, I would have easily said Perfect Game. If OP had said you won Game 7, or were WS MVP or something else that indicates might not have won the WS without you, then I would have easily said World Series. But just that you were a starter, but no info on how you did, to me puts it in that gray area. I might lean slightly to Perfect Game, and no WS doesn't mean your teams didn't have lots of success in your career (e.g. I think the Kelly Bills were very successful despite no SB win).

 

[catsfanbgky]

Myself, winning a championship trumps ANY individual accomplishment. Now throwing a no hitter / perfect game while winning the championship would be a dream come true, but if forced to pick, give me the ring. I am pretty sure Barry Sanders would agree. I mean Greg Maddux, Steve Carlton, Pedro Martinez, Curt Shilling, and the great Roger Clemons, never threw a no-no. ALL HOF pitchers. Cy Young, Sandy Koufax, randy Johnson are pitchers who never threw a perfect game. team accomplishments always take honors over personal accomplishments. Your goal is to be the best team every year, not be perfect for ONE game.

Guys like Domingo German, Phillip Humber, Dallas Braden, Len Barker, have thrown a perfect game.

 

[J_Dee]

A perfect game is a team accomplishment, fellas -- the catcher calls every pitch, and your nine defensive players can't make a single mistake.

 

[*CatinIL*]

A perfect game is a team accomplishment, fellas -- the catcher calls every pitch, and your nine defensive players can't make a single mistake.

True...but I'd still rather have that ring.

 

[bthaunert]

Craziest perfect game stat is that none happened between 1922 - 1956 and then you had 3 in the same year (2012). Give me a decent career and starting pitcher in the World Series where we won the ring over a perfect game any day of the week.