Maybe in the Matrix world they create for us the Cats win every game. If so, sign me up!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now there comes a point where the sport is unrecognizable. When I can no longer throw a brick thru my tv when a real life ref makes a terrible call, we will have reached that point. Baseball now is at that point with the universal dh and pitch clock. Communist conspiracies to make us weak!I would. I think it takes the bias out Of the game and you can’t bribe a robot . No more Higgins or his buddies trying to screw UK or Cal.
I have long thought baseball was missing an opportunity to have lasers call balls and strikes .
Awfully hard for a coach or manager or fan to argue with AI calls.
Players would adjust. It’s so physical now because refs allow it to be.The game is so physical now. If it's too exacting you'd never be able to complete the game. Everybody would foul out.
Makes sense to determine balls and strikes.
That may be the funniest post on here in a long timeCal would figure out a way to pi$$ off the algorithm.
Oh, I think they would....they would control the programmers. A little code adjustment here and there and there's your point spread or your win/loss.The sports gambling industry bosses will never allow it😂
Artificial Insemination? Heck yeah. It’s amazing.I would. I think it takes the bias out Of the game and you can’t bribe a robot . No more Higgins or his buddies trying to screw UK or Cal.
I have long thought baseball was missing an opportunity to have lasers call balls and strikes .
Awfully hard for a coach or manager or fan to argue with AI calls.
Shockcollars for the officials and coaches have two shocks per half.Or just have repercussions for bad /biased calls.
Don’t worry there will be a brick throwing app that simulates a real brick smashing into a TV.Now there comes a point where the sport is unrecognizable. When I can no longer throw a brick thru my tv when a real life ref makes a terrible call, we will have reached that point. Baseball now is at that point with the universal dh and pitch clock. Communist conspiracies to make us weak!
Hilarious!!!Cal would figure out a way to pi$$ off the algorithm.
Their not robots......Hilarious!!!
The problem is, you still have to have the human element to program the AI. Who's to say an unscrupulous programmer wouldn't weigh the calls. Something along the lines of: AI must be 95% certain of a foul before calling a foul on team A, but only 75% sure before calling a foul on team B. I'd still be leary of gamblers and such finding ways to manipulate the software.I would. I think it takes the bias out Of the game and you can’t bribe a robot . No more Higgins or his buddies trying to screw UK or Cal.
I have long thought baseball was missing an opportunity to have lasers call balls and strikes .
Awfully hard for a coach or manager or fan to argue with AI calls.
Just as long as John Higgins didn't get to program the AI that was reffing the UK games.I would. I think it takes the bias out Of the game and you can’t bribe a robot . No more Higgins or his buddies trying to screw UK or Cal.
I have long thought baseball was missing an opportunity to have lasers call balls and strikes .
Awfully hard for a coach or manager or fan to argue with AI calls.
This is an interesting proposition.Maybe in the Matrix world they create for us the Cats win every game. If so, sign me up!!
Never tell me the odds.The odds of that happening are approximately 3,725 to one.
It’s well within the capabilities of AI to accomplish this.Maybe a more interesting question is "Would you favor AI as an in-game Head Coach?".
I can't see anyway AI could do practices and player development. But as far as putting in the right combinations of guys, and calling instant plays, why not?
Hack it. They will probably be the ones setting it up from the get go. Would be just as biased as a game official.Duke or Kansas would probably hack it.
The odds of that happening are approximately 3,725 to one.
That went over so many heads.
"It" was but this is different by design. @christophero was intentionally saying the odds of AI reffing happening/working right are just a little worse than the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field in stop-motion with a little plastic starship.I hate being "that guy" but wasn't it 3,720 to 1 ??
I've done a lot of image recognization and you're correct. However it could be used as an aid for the officials. Providing a percentage of correctness of what AI found. I'ld start with flopping and charges lol. The officials don't always get the correct camera angle either.I’ve thought the same thing for a long time about balls and strikes in baseball.
In basketball, because everyone is moving, it would take a lot of different camera angles for AI to be reasonably accurate.
I ran this through Bard, Google's AI. Here's what Bard said:Why not have AI monitor and eliminate stupid posts. It would cut down on a lot of wasted reading.
There are a few reasons why AI might not be the best solution for eliminating stupid posts.
For all of these reasons, it is not clear that AI is the best solution for eliminating stupid posts. More research is needed to determine whether or not AI can be used effectively for this purpose.
- It can be difficult to define what constitutes a "stupid" post. What one person finds stupid, another person might find funny or insightful. AI would need to be trained on a massive dataset of human-labeled posts in order to develop a reliable understanding of what constitutes stupidity.
- Even if AI could accurately identify stupid posts, it would still be difficult to determine whether or not they should be eliminated. Some stupid posts might be harmless, while others could be harmful or offensive. AI would need to be able to make these kinds of judgments in order to avoid censoring legitimate content.
- Finally, even if AI could accurately identify and eliminate stupid posts, it would still be a controversial move. Some people might argue that it is wrong for AI to censor content, even if it is stupid. Others might argue that AI is not capable of making these kinds of judgments accurately.
In the meantime, there are other ways to deal with stupid posts. For example, users can block or report posts that they find offensive or harmful. They can also choose to ignore posts that they don't find interesting. By taking these steps, users can help to create a more positive and productive online environment.
Duke certainly has the nerds to do that. KU not so muchHack it. They will probably be the ones setting it up from the get go. Would be just as biased as a game official.