ADVERTISEMENT

Why was the defense so bad last season?

No, they go hand in hand. Cal's philosophy has always been "funnel the guards into the shot blockers" so when we didn't have an Anthony Davis, he should've coached his guards a different way of defense. You're right but doesn't mean we aren't also.
That wasn't even necessary in the past for Cal to have effective defenses.

Jorts and Bam were the starting centers for great and even elite defensive units and neither were above the rim, dominant forces blocking shots at the rim.

We had a defensive savant in 2021 in Jackson and a darn good shot blocking big in Richards in 2020. The 2021 team finished 35th while the 2020 team finished 52nd in defensive efficiency.

The game has changed, and Cal's coaching has yet to adapt. Last year's team certainly could have had inferior defensive players, but the Cal of the 2010's would have had that group in the top 50 of defensive efficiency easily.
 
Last edited:
I will tell you why but I'm not sure anyone will take me seriously. Defense is tougher than offense and requires far more cooperation on the floor. So the better you know the guy next to you, the better you're going to be defensively as a team. So it takes years to build a consistent defense. You have to know each other intimately because you will face situations in games that you can't simulate in practice and you have to know how the guy next you is going to react to it. This is one reason experience beats out young talent pretty consistently.
 
90% of the people will say coaching.

Truth is, we just had poor defensive players. That's all.

It's the same exact reason we were so efficient on offense. We had a group of insanely talented players on one side of the ball that were not good on defense.
Many, many times it seems the better offensive players are weaker on defense.
Not just here at UK … it is everywhere.
It will be interesting to see how Pope blends his players to be solid on both ends. That is his biggest challenge, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Answer1313
The NBA didn't seem to mind, drafting two of those defenders #3 and #8 in the draft.

Let's cut the BS and call it for what it was: our bad defenders never improved defensively all season. Not even a fraction.

That's ultimately coaching.
Reed and Dilly were NOT drafted for their defense man, get real…go back and watch their defense. Off balll Reed was good, but man, those guys were rough to watch, nd didn’t have a good defensive big to back them up, except occasionally Ugo.


Everything comes back to coaching, but acting like they were drafted as good defenders isn’t actually cutting the BS.
 
Reed and Dilly were NOT drafted for their defense man, get real…go back and watch their defense. Off balll Reed was good, but man, those guys were rough to watch, nd didn’t have a good defensive big to back them up, except occasionally Ugo.


Everything comes back to coaching, but acting like they were drafted as good defenders isn’t actually cutting the BS.
Nah. Your response is illogical.

Show me where I said they were drafted because of their defense. You can't, because I didn't say that. Then you doubled down and made your entire response based on your lack of reading comprehension of my post. What a miserably awful response on your part, man.

Logically, your response doesn't even make sense. Why would I argue that bad defenders were drafted because of their defense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix
90% of the people will say coaching.

Truth is, we just had poor defensive players. That's all.

It's the same exact reason we were so efficient on offense. We had a group of insanely talented players on one side of the ball that were not good on defense.
I agree somewhat but coaching played a large part of why it was so bad. They were good enough to be decent enough on defense to make a run. When you don’t get taught basic defensive principles it’s hard. We don’t know how to guard a screen nor pressure on the outside. Then we don’t ever go zone which is what 90% of coaches would do with a team like that.
 
But this highlights the problem right here.

If you want to blame Cal for the poor defense, then you have to credit him for what the offense was able to accomplish.

You either take the stance that A) the coaching plays a huge part in this.........or B) it doesn't and it's mainly based on players.

What you can't do is say Cal is to blame for the defense but then not give credit to him for the offense. That's not logical.

You're correct. It's been awhile since we had a good defensive team under Cal. The main reason we have sucked on defense for so long is the lack of interior presence.

Easy to have a great defense when you had Anthony Davis swatting back every shot.

I'm of the mindset that had a whole hell of a lot more to do with things than Cal's coaching approach.

We had good defense when we had good defensive players. It's funny how that works.

People give way too much credit and way too much blame to coaches.
Coaching.
I don't give him credit for offense. We saw him take over the offense near the end of the year, and it went into the tank.
That is why Welsch was leaving even when 🐄 was thought to be retuning.
We had reverted to his style.
He loves the rock fight.
 
  • Love
Reactions: NociHTTP and chroix
Payne sucked man, I think he was good at his role here and he obviously knew how to teach big men how to play ok but his performance as a head coach really makes me think about what all he was good at.

Yeah I liked KP too but you do have to wonder how much of his reputation wasn’t because he had kids like AD, KAT and Cousins to point to as layers he’d “developed” like those dudes weren’t going to be top three picks anywhere they went. Jorts improved a ton but feels like that was work ethic more than the program investing heavily in him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NociHTTP
It seems many only care about defense when we lose. You have to focus and care about defense because you want to prevent losing. Defense can always be more consistent than offense … and it has to be. I think Pope and staff know this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: chroix
Injuries and Players missing games, especially in the frontcourt coupled with the young players took away teamwork needed to play good defense every game.
 
Coaching.
I don't give him credit for offense. We saw him take over the offense near the end of the year, and it went into the tank.
That is why Welsch was leaving even when 🐄 was thought to be retuning.
We had reverted to his style.
He loves the rock fight.

We had top efficient offenses way before Welsh even got here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshukai
Many, many times it seems the better offensive players are weaker on defense.
Not just here at UK … it is everywhere.
It will be interesting to see how Pope blends his players to be solid on both ends. That is his biggest challenge, I think.

I think maybe another part of all of this is sometimes when you expend that much energy and focus on the offense, the defense lacks

I agree. We've seen time after time after time "good" teams get bounced quite early in the NCAA tournament because they are extremely one sided either to the offense or defense. It looks like we've got a group of players coming in that might have the right balance so I'm curious to see how we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue
I agree somewhat but coaching played a large part of why it was so bad. They were good enough to be decent enough on defense to make a run. When you don’t get taught basic defensive principles it’s hard. We don’t know how to guard a screen nor pressure on the outside. Then we don’t ever go zone which is what 90% of coaches would do with a team like that.

I think that coaching would have helped at the margins. Is there another coach out there that could have had the defense play somewhat better? Sure. But we finished 109th in def efficiency. How higher could another coach have gotten that? 80th? 70th?

I just think it's an interesting discussion to have. Just how much weight does one place on what a coach can do.

But at UK where the seasons are defined by final fours and national championships, I just don't think there was any coach out there getting that particular team to play defense at a level to compete for that.
 
We had top efficient offenses way before Welsh even got here.
Nah.

When Welch was here, we ranked #6.

Here's the years before he arrived:

2023: #36
2022: #10
2021: #202
2020 (the fabled Maxey team): #44
2019: #22
2018: #61
2017: #16 (he had Bam, Fox, and Monk, and still couldn't crack the top 15)
2016: #11 (Ulis and Murray, and still not a top 10 offense)
2015: #11
2014: #32
2013: #41
2012: #4
2011: #16
2010: #17

That's an average ranking of #35 in the nation. Take out the 2012 and 2021 teams for fairness sake and Cal's other 13 UK teams still only ranked #25 in offensive efficiency.

That's not elite. Calipari only had a top 10 offensive efficiency team three times in his UK career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshukai
Nah.

When Welch was here, we ranked #6.

Here's the years before he arrived:

2023: #36
2022: #10
2021: #202
2020 (the fabled Maxey team): #44
2019: #22
2018: #61
2017: #16 (he had Bam, Fox, and Monk, and still couldn't crack the top 15)
2016: #11 (Ulis and Murray, and still not a top 10 offense)
2015: #11
2014: #32
2013: #41
2012: #4
2011: #16
2010: #17

That's an average ranking of #35 in the nation. Take out the 2012 and 2021 teams for fairness sake and Cal's other 13 UK teams still only ranked #25 in offensive efficiency.

That's not elite. Calipari only had a top 10 offensive efficiency team three times in his UK career.

Having a top 25 offense is certainly good enough. You pair those with top 25 defenses and you are competing for national titles and final fours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue
Having a top 25 offense is certainly good enough. You pair those with top 25 defenses and you are competing for national titles and final fours.
The problem is that his defenses started sucking too in the last few years:

2024: #211
2023: #103
2022: #35
2021: #110
2020: #59

You see why he's gone now?

Why are you still acting like he could coach? Clearly, the five year trend shows his offensive and defensive efficiencies were gutter level.

You want to compete for Final Fours? Get your offensive and defensive efficiencies BOTH in the top 20.
 
I just think it's an interesting discussion to have. Just how much weight does one place on what a coach can do.

But at UK where the seasons are defined by final fours and national championships, I just don't think there was any coach out there getting that particular team to play defense at a level to compete for that.
I think utter disregard for turnover production is a folly in approach that could have been easily addressed and exploited by practically any other coach, especially given Reed's preternatural ability.
 
The problem is that his defenses started sucking too in the last few years:

2024: #211
2023: #103
2022: #35
2021: #110
2020: #59

You see why he's gone now?

Why are you still acting like he could coach? Clearly, the five year trend shows his offensive and defensive efficiencies were gutter level.

You want to compete for Final Fours? Get your offensive and defensive efficiencies BOTH in the top 20.
There was only ONE team whose offense and defense were both ranked in the TOP 25 last season.
Any guesses as to who that team was ??
POINTS SCOREDWLPOINTS ALLOWEDWL
1​
ALABAMA90.1
25​
12​
HOUSTON
57.6​
32​
5​
1​
2​
KENTUCKY89.0
23​
10​
SAINT MARY'S (CA)
59.2​
26​
8​
2​
3​
ARIZONA87.1
27​
9​
VIRGINIA
59.7​
23​
11​
3​
4​
WRIGHT STATE86.5
18​
14​
IOWA STATE
61.5​
29​
8​
4​
5​
SAMFORD86.1
29​
6​
MARIST
62.2​
18​
13​
5​
6​
FLORIDA85.6
24​
12​
McNEESE STATE
62.2​
30​
4​
6​
7​
INDIANA STATE84.8
32​
7​
VERMONT
63.0​
28​
7​
7​
8​
GONZAGA84.5
27​
8​
WAGNER
63.1​
17​
16​
8​
9​
HIGH POINT83.9
27​
9​
UCONN
63.4
37
3
9​
10​
ILLINOIS83.4
29​
9​
MOREHEAD STATE
63.4​
29​
9​
10​
11​
JAMES MADISON83.2
32​
4​
TOWSON
63.6​
20​
14​
11​
12​
IOWA83.1
19​
15​
NORTH TEXAS
63.8​
19​
15​
12​
13​
AUBURN83.1
27​
8​
SAINT PETER'S
64.0​
19​
14​
13​
14​
KENNESAW STATE82.8
15​
16​
COLGATE
64.1​
25​
10​
14​
15​
PURDUE82.3
34​
5​
ARMY
64.3​
10​
22​
15​
16​
CORNELL82.1
22​
8​
LOUISIANA TECH
64.5​
22​
10​
16​
17​
LIPSCOMB82.1
20​
12​
MERRIMACK
65.4​
21​
12​
17​
18​
FLORIDA ATLANTIC82.0
25​
9​
UCLA
65.5​
16​
17​
18​
19​
NORTH CAROLINA81.9
29​
8​
LIBERTY
65.5​
18​
14​
19​
20​
TULANE81.9
17​
17​
CHARLOTTE
65.6​
19​
12​
20​
21​
UT - MARTIN81.5
21​
11​
VILLANOVA
65.6​
18​
16​
21​
22​
BYU81.4
23​
11​
WESTERN ILLINOIS
65.7​
21​
12​
22​
23​
UCONN81.4
37
3
MARYLAND
65.9​
16​
17​
23​
24​
YOUNGSTOWN STATE81.2
22​
10​
GEORGE MASON
65.9​
20​
12​
24​
25​
DENVER81.0
17​
17​
MICHIGAN STATE
66.1​
20​
15​
25​
AVERAGES83.7
24.8​
10.0​
AVERAGES
63.6​
22.1​
11.8​
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Son_Of_Saul
The problem is that his defenses started sucking too in the last few years:

2024: #211
2023: #103
2022: #35
2021: #110
2020: #59

You see why he's gone now?

Why are you still acting like he could coach? Clearly, the five year trend shows his offensive and defensive efficiencies were gutter level.

You want to compete for Final Fours? Get your offensive and defensive efficiencies BOTH in the top 20.
You can’t use statistics and logic in an argument with someone that doesn’t use statistics and logic to form their opinion in the first place. They’ll never accept it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT