You know you remind me of the media you pick out one part of a sentence and go to war with it and neglect the rest. I will agree with you I should not have mentioned Hitler and I wouldn't throw a rock through his business window of any color, but the rest of your oratory is your opinion and I don't agree with it. How does Higgins have the ball, should we just sit back and say hey it ok you can cost out team and fans a chance to compete for a national title, and we will get on our little computers and send Mark Emmert a email telling him that John Higgins gave UNC an unfair advantage in a supposedly neutral game and yes send John one also and say we wish you would be more respectful of our team in the future.....right!!!
Well, now that we have agreement on how inappropriate the analogy was, let me say that I agree with your email campaign. I'd include the UK administration as well. That's a civil discourse and expresses a specific issue, with supporting data for the issue, etc. I have zero problem with that.
How does Higgins have the ball? Well, he's got the rock really. How? We threw it through his virtual store window, dozens of times. It was blue and white and some had FU or other imaginative expletive nicely embossed. He has the rock because we threw it to him. If we had exercised some common sense and restraint, we had a legitimate compliant and a path to air it. Now we got nothing. He has damages and a smoking gun.