ADVERTISEMENT

Who Thinks We Can Beat Duke In Basketball and Why

I still think having a bucket guy is important, almost every champion ever had a bucket guy or best player that was one of the best In the sport.
Yeah, I haven’t seen Pope run it at UK so I am only saying what it should be. You may well be very right. Plus it’s always nice to have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
I'm excited. I don't expect us to look as disjointed as Cal's teams did early in the season. We've got veterans and a coach that cares about winning and the program.
That's where I'm at. I'm not expecting a win, but I bet we look more like an organized team. Pope isn't just gonna roll the ball out there. We may take some Ls, but I'll be happy as heck to see good team basketball again.
 
I do. I might give Duke the slight edge, but honestly if we played them 100 games, I think it would be 55-45 (+/-5) games. So pretty much even.

PG/SG/SF:
Proctor, James, Foster, Gillis, Evans, Knueppel, Harris
vs
Robinson, Oweh, Butler, Brea, Kriisa

PF & C:
Flagg, Brown, Maluach
vs
Carr, Williams, Garrison

Other guys:
Knueppel, Harris, Ngongba
vs
Almonor, Chandler, Perry, Noah

At the PG/SG/SF spots, that looks pretty even. Proctor and Robinson could be all-ACC/SEC 2nd team guys. Duke has height advantage over Butler & Kriisa, UK has better shooting.
At the PF/C spots, I'll give Duke a SLIGHT advantage, mostly due to Flagg being a more athletic Carr. The other 4 are pretty even.
The "Other guys" looks pretty even.

First of all, I do not see Flagg as a generational talent, a Kobe, Garnett, Durrant, James, Edwards. It's way too early to say that about anyone. The only HS player in the past 50 years that probably had that aura about him was James. Flagg could possibly be in that next tier (all-stars), which is great. But is he there now? I really doubt it. He didn't dominate or even separate himself at the McD game/practices, he was "just another guy". That is NOT what a "generational talent" does. Each year the "hype" around whoever the best guy is gets bigger and bigger, and is often an overstatement of their true talents (at that time). I would be surprised a bit, if he is as good next year as Holmgren was at Gonzaga. But yeah, that's still pretty good.
 
We will win because this is their coach...

10410731.jpg
Jon_Scheyer_Goofy_Face.jpg
 
Put one good defender on Flagg, if he gets 30 so be it, keep everyone else sub par and you have a great chance to win…. And we’re Kentucky we can beat anyone, anywhere, anytime!
That's fun to say, but if this team and staff had BYU across their chest would you be as confident about a win against Duke?
 
I don’t think Flagg will be up to speed for college ball yet. There’s a huge difference between high school and college, and while Flagg might own college at some point he is gonna have a steep learning curve at the beginning much like the freshman we have watched. I think UK fits in that time period before he is polished as a college player.
 
Not ready to say we will win, but we will be a tough matchup for Duke. We are experienced and gritty with high level defenders on the perimeter and in the paint. If they win its because Flagg is just too good. With it being his first big game, I like our chances.
 
If the big guy from Africa is what they expect him to be then Duke is even better. But big guys take time to develop, so I agree
I think he is the key to what kind of season Duke will have. Can he force teams to win by hitting jumpers? Can he be close to an automatic bucket from a lob? Will he dominate the glass? Will he be foul prone? All that remains to be seen, but he has played a lot vs guys much older and experienced than him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dontworryboutit23
I think we will win. Not just because I think we will win every game, {I do}, but this just looks like a win even trying to be objective.

We will play collected and poised and they won't. It's early. They will try to play it down. Pope won't. He might in the press? But not to the players. We are without a doubt a top 10 team. How well the pieces come together will determine if we are top 5.

I think this team will be a joy to watch. And early too. We won't have to wait until January to see what we have.
 
A better question for the OP is, "who thinks we can't win vs Duke, and why?".


To say you don't think we will win, is one thing. But to say you don't think we can win, that is a ridiculous statement. It's not we are marching Mark Coury, Bobby Perry, Jeff Tackett, Brandon Stockton, and Jeff Carrier out there.
 
If you added two lottery picks to UK's current roster, that would basically be Duke.

They're more talented than us. It's okay to admit that. Can we beat them? Sure, but they'll be favored by 6 to 8 points.

Early season cohesion will be the key to whoever wins, obviously.
 
I don’t think Flagg will be up to speed for college ball yet. There’s a huge difference between high school and college, and while Flagg might own college at some point he is gonna have a steep learning curve at the beginning much like the freshman we have watched. I think UK fits in that time period before he is polished as a college player.

Duke has 2 warmup games before UK so I wouldn't get your hopes in that regard to flagg.

We also have some guys from smaller conferences we are counting on and that is also a big adjustment. I think they will be fine as well though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skyguyb27
I think Robinson could be good enough in that role.
With the shooting percentages coming in, I think that role could be filled by committee on any given night. Surely the whole team wouldn’t get cold…..again……right?

I’m hoping whatever caused the effect of every team shooting crazy stats in Rupp except UK ends with Pope.
 
Last edited:
Let’s first say I have no idea but have hopes on the system, but we are relying on average players to make it through an entire season. Cautiously optimistic of 21 wins. Some upsets, some disappointments for a year or two is my guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Clever. But just curious what your mindset it here. No right or wrong answer. The 2 times we have played Duke recently they have had the best player and won
While having the "best" player is always nice, I've haven't been impressed with Scheyer, so much. I'm sure the game will be competitive and there is much we don't know about our team. What I like and hope is that our players will play up to the challenge of a Duke vs UK rivalry. I think Pope will be able to instill some of the fire that has aways separated UK from most other schools and find ways to win even when we might not measure up on paper, an intangible. We may not win the game but if we don't win, I do think it will be competitive, but then again ... it's UK and it's Pope's team. Looking forward to some coaching in Lexington and the good things it brings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ky grandpa
I think absolutely either team has a chance.
Toss up game.

Right now no matter who wins I’m not ready to say they will be a great team.
And vise verse if they loose they will be a bad team.

I’m taking UK just simple reason Pope truly knows how important this game is to fans.
 
CAN beat them, yes. For years, we've gone into the Champion's classic as the least experienced team. And our inexperience has shown, and cost us.

I also have long gotten the vibe that Cal convinced himself he doesn't care about games in November. He lets the kids do what they want. And when they lose, it's a teaching moment. After all, March is all that matters.

And while I'm not here to tell you that a non-conference game in November defines your season, they cetainly matter. These events should be huge non-conference wins and resume' builders. Instead, it's an annual L.

Pope won't have Cal's "whatever, we're built for March" attitude. For once, we're going into this event with an older veteran heavy team.

Also, Scheyer isn't anything special on the sideline. Or at least he hasn't been so far. I'm not saying Pope necessarily is either. But I would be a lot more concerned going into this thing playing coach K.

WILL we win? Don't know. I'm betting Vegas has Duke favored when the time comes. But I don't think this will be a John Calipari 30 point blowout in Indianapolis, but "Hey, it's ok, we're built for Marhc."
 
UK has a chance, but should be the underdog.

Projected Starters

PG Butler vs. Proctor
Edge: Duke
SG Oweh vs. Foster
Edge: Duke
SF Robinson vs. Flagg
Edge: Duke
PF Carr vs. Brown
Edge: UK
C Williams vs. Maluach
Edge: UK

Bench
Edge: UK(slight)

If you count Flagg as a wing (ESPN has him projected to start at the 3), then I think Duke is stronger on the perimeter and UK is stronger inside. But I do think Flagg will play some at the 4.

Flagg is a matchup nightmare wherever they put him. Too quick for a PF to guard and too big for a SF to handle.

I think UK keeps it close, but ultimately Duke gets the win, 87-81.
 
UK has a chance, but should be the underdog.

Projected Starters

PG Butler vs. Proctor
Edge: Duke
SG Oweh vs. Foster
Edge: Duke
SF Robinson vs. Flagg
Edge: Duke
PF Carr vs. Brown
Edge: UK
C Williams vs. Maluach
Edge: UK

Bench
Edge: UK(slight)

If you count Flagg as a wing (ESPN has him projected to start at the 3), then I think Duke is stronger on the perimeter and UK is stronger inside. But I do think Flagg will play some at the 4.

Flagg is a matchup nightmare wherever they put him. Too quick for a PF to guard and too big for a SF to handle.

I think UK keeps it close, but ultimately Duke gets the win, 87-81.
Butler and Proctor is close, but yeah slight edge to Proctor.
Oweh and Foster, I think Oweh has the slight edge.
Duke has a bunch of 6'5-6'7 guys, but not much big depth (same as us), so I don't think they will go big with Flagg at the SF for much of the game (maybe 8-10min at the SF). So, I think it may be Robinson vs James, and I'll take Robinson in that matchup.
Then I say Flagg over Carr.
And Williams and Brown are even, or tiny edge to Williams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucsrule8872
You mean like how Wake Forest had Tim Duncan? Or LSU had Shaq? Or Navy had David Robinson?

Basketball is a team sport.
You just named 3 players from the 1990s, when college basketball was drastically different. Basketball is a team sport, but individual players can take over games and win them. Duke will have the 2 best players on the floor in this game. Duke will win this game, like they have when they have the best player on the floor. Kentucky will be fine, but this will be dukes game.
 
Better question...who was Kentucky's coach the 2 times we played Duke recently? That makes a world of difference!
Yes coaching does make a difference, but players have to make the plays on the court, and Duke has better players than Kentucky, especially early in the season
 
Yes coaching does make a difference, but players have to make the plays on the court, and Duke has better players than Kentucky, especially early in the season
Coaching makes a big difference. The garbage coach that finally left Kentucky after last season proved that. He had more talent than just about anyone, but was such a pathetic coach, he couldn't do anything with it.

It's a combination...you need good player and a good coach. I think Kentucky finally has that again, so I like our chances.
 
Coaching makes a big difference. The garbage coach that finally left Kentucky after last season proved that. He had more talent than just about anyone, but was such a pathetic coach, he couldn't do anything with it.

It's a combination...you need good player and a good coach. I think Kentucky finally has that again, so I like our chances.
Kentucky has a better systematic and basketball mind coach in pope. But Duke still has more talent and will have the best player in college basketball most likely on the floor. I think Kentucky will be better than a lot of the media are acting like, but Duke 3rd game of the season will be a loss.
 
Kentucky has a better systematic and basketball mind coach in pope. But Duke still has more talent and will have the best player in college basketball most likely on the floor. I think Kentucky will be better than a lot of the media are acting like, but Duke 3rd game of the season will be a loss.
Might be. I just don't think it's a guarantee.
 
Kentucky has a better systematic and basketball mind coach in pope. But Duke still has more talent and will have the best player in college basketball most likely on the floor. I think Kentucky will be better than a lot of the media are acting like, but Duke 3rd game of the season will be a loss.
I think it being the third game gives UK a better opportunity. Now if the dukies live up to their hype, I’d rather not catch them in March. But we’ve seen guys struggle in their first big college game, and we’ve seen guys dominate from the start. So you never know.

As someone who has seen about a minute of Flagg playing, I will be curious to watch him and how Pope decides to handle the defensive duties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ky grandpa
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT