Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ford and Macy were PGs who could shoot, not shooting guards.
Also, how is Lamb, our best 3pt% shooter EVER (no one else close), not in the list?
I was always a fan of Meeks, you could see it as a FR how good he could be. Then injuries derailed his Soph year.
But you can make a good case for several of these. Murray and Delk were 2 & 3 for me.
Uh no! Ford? He had one great shooting year, and that was it. Not to mention he was a POINT GUARD, not a shooting guard.It’s Delk and then everyone else. Booker would be next on that list though. Followed closely by Ford.
OP included other guards too. Ford is still top 3 in 3pt percentage and top 6 in made 3 pts.Uh no! Ford? He had one great shooting year, and that was it. Not to mention he was a POINT GUARD, not a shooting guard.
You post a lot, but you don’t know a lot. Ford had one really good shooting year, while teams were tripling Mash in the paint. After Mash left and Ford had to face some defense, he was a totally different player.OP included other guards too. Ford is still top 3 in 3pt percentage and top 6 in made 3 pts.
One good shooting year. Yeah. Sure.
Well, since the OP said “shooter”, I’ll take the guy who ranks #1 all time at UK — Doron Lamb. If we’re talking overall game, I’d pick someone else.Who you got?
Well, it’s an oddly worded question so I guess it’s just how you read it. He doesn’t necessarily ask who the best shooter is. He asks which shooter you’d take as your starting 2 guard.I’m a big Lamb fan so not hating on that. But if I’m picking my starting 2 guard like OP said, it’s TD00.Well, since the OP said “shooter”, I’ll take the guy who ranks #1 all time at UK — Doron Lamb. If we’re talking overall game, I’d pick someone else.
I get that pick, but do we give equal consideration to one year players like Murray or Monk, as we give a four year player who wasn’t good enough to play serious minutes as a freshman but later became a star? It’s not really an equally balanced question.Well, it’s an oddly worded question so I guess it’s just how you read it. He doesn’t necessarily ask who the best shooter is. He asks which shooter you’d take as your starting 2 guard.I’m a big Lamb fan so not hating on that. But if I’m picking my starting 2 guard like OP said, it’s TD00.
You can give consideration to whatever you want lol, I’d say it’s a pretty subjective question. I’m taking the final four MOP. TD for life.I get that pick, but do we give equal consideration to one year players like Murray or Monk, as we give a four year player who wasn’t good enough to play serious minutes as a freshman but later became a star? It’s not really an equally balanced question.
If you say so. I was ten. So forgive me if my memory’s a little freaking rusty. His stats still speak for themselves.You post a lot, but you don’t know a lot. Ford had one really good shooting year, while teams were tripling Mash in the paint. After Mash left and Ford had to face some defense, he was a totally different player.
Murray was sneaky at best. Excellent shooter but fell to the UK March curse. Murray is great now but all I can remember from that IU S16 is clang. It his fault per se. just piss poor timing to go cold.I get that pick, but do we give equal consideration to one year players like Murray or Monk, as we give a four year player who wasn’t good enough to play serious minutes as a freshman but later became a star? It’s not really an equally balanced question.
Exactly this. No matter how great Ad, Gilchrist, and Teague were. You don’t sniff a championship without lamb and jones.How did we get Lamb, Harrison twins, Terrence Jones, Ulis to come back while the BJ Bostons and the like go to the draft. Man did we hit the lotto.
This is true. I know they are separate positions but to me both those positions better freaking be able to shoot and score.Ford was a good shooter as a point guard but I don’t know why he’s on this poll with the way the question is asked, lol
Give me 00, every time.
If the criteria is based on how they played at UK, and not the NBA, then way too many people are voting for Booker.
Yes, Booker has turned out to be the best NBA player of all those guys, but he was not even close to Delk or Murray in college.
I get that pick, but do we give equal consideration to one year players like Murray or Monk, as we give a four year player who wasn’t good enough to play serious minutes as a freshman but later became a star? It’s not really an equally balanced question.