Mine still hurt when I think about them.I've had a few of the original cans of WHOOPASS opened up on me in that era...
Mine still hurt when I think about them.I've had a few of the original cans of WHOOPASS opened up on me in that era...
The dang program is rated XXX from top to bottom. The state of Kentucky should make you be over 21 to go to a UL game.Good question. UL won't be dealing with the fair board this time.
My 7 year old is well aware of my distaste for UL. The other day she asked "what's so bad about Louisville" Sad part was they're so dirty I couldn't even tell her.
If the financial penalties are the money received for playing in the ACC and NCAA tournaments they will not get that reduced.It's foolish to predict what a committee might do, but i don't think that's a good group if you're a Louisville fan. One college athletics guy (the erstwhile AD at Vandy), a lawyer, and two female college administrators. If you're picking a jury for this one, you definitely want no women on the jury, and especially no women from college campuses. You want a bunch of old college ADs, guys who might be sympathetic, who might think "I need to go easy on these fellas in case I'm ever in a position of being judged."
Anyway, just a flat out guess, I think they reduce some of the financial penalties and affirm the taking of the banners.....
Putting effort into something you know you can't win is hard to do.
That certainly explains where the "players were forced to attend the parties" BS comes from.
I'm no lawyer and I'm certainly wrong enough but I didn't really see anything in their appeal that was actionable. The article and the NCAA site clearly shows 4 avenues for appeal.
1. The COI had to misunderstand a fact and a pertinent fact I would assume. That didn't happen, 3 more chances.
2. The facts don't show a violation of rules. Haha, nope, 2 more chances.
3. There was a procedural error that caused the outcome. Nope, last one.
4. The COI abused its discretion. This is really all UL is trying to say happened but that bar sounds really really high. UL admits players were "technically" ineligible. Once they are ineligible, the rest is the natural outcome of playing ineligible athletes. 68 pages of spin doesn't change that. I can't see any way on earth the appeals committee reverses anything for UL, not a thing.
So, then, what are the odds UL files suit against the NCAA. I say 0.0001%.
You mean they could have been reinstated if they gave back the blow jobs?Great post.
I am not sure how the committee could rightfully employ the hypothetical UL is trying to declare in regard to the notion that the ineligible players would have been reinstated if only caught earlier...?
As a board member, I could easily sympathize with the UL attorneys and say...
"Yes, I agree, they definitely could have been reinstated... had your school reported the violation much earlier, like... before the championship season. But you didn't, so we will never know, and you surely do not expect the four of us to set a precedent of establishing punishments on the basis of defending programs utilizing a defense of "well...what if this would have happened, instead of what really did happen?", do you?"
That's strangely both gross and curious.You mean they could have been reinstated if they gave back the blow jobs?
You mean they could have been reinstated if they gave back the blow jobs?
Don't forget about the parents of those recruits as well. I guess you could say UofL and Katina provided "full service" to all family members.@Steelers2012 ???
Very good post. Each UL fan (hey y'all! ) should read this at least 43 times. Eat it up ya know ? This post (and many others in the thread ) basically lay it out exactly... as to why the title (was) VACATED. I know it sucks. I know it sucks for the legit / nice (few and far between but still ) UL fans but... I mean it is what it effing is. Pretty sure like no other fan base or even media etc is on board with UL / fans reasons for "appeal" they look absolutely foolish.
All this extra "they weren't attractive!" bS is absolutely desperate. It's pitiful really .
At the end of the day
UL coaching staff/ athletics dept --- provided and paid for hookers for
Underage recruits
Team players.
Literally provided prostitutes for 4 years. It's very open and shut.
They will forever be tarnished . Sure, I think UL will eventually "move past" this , so to speak. I don't think their doomed to NIT's for the rest of time. But this will and has hurt them. They will forever be the ONLY bball team to have a title VACATED. Not only that , loosing all those wins knocks them right out of the top 20 in all time wins. That's GOTTA make people 77 different ways of salty.
The strange thing is how un-embarrassed the fans of UL (and UNC) are regarding this situation.
UofL's appeal reminds me of a case I appealed to the KY Supreme Court. I took over a case for a client who had lost all the way up because his first lawyer missed the statute of limitations.
I had to write a brief trying to explain how the lower court was wrong while knowing full well my client was screwed more than Chane Behanan at a Minardi Party. Hardest damned thing I ever had to write. I imagine counsel for UofL has the same feeling about now. Putting effort into something you know you can't win is hard to do.
The University of Kentucky at Louisville.It is time to eliminate ul. It should be restructured as part of the University of Kentucky and be run by the UK administration. All the athletics should be eliminated.
Sex changes for all of the girls paid for by the university for the act then, reverse the operation to the original configuration if wanted. Heck they might want to stay that way and play for UL. They still have eligibility left. They were red skirted for that season.That's strangely both gross and curious.
Same rules as in football. Requires video evidence to overturn the call. Sadly Louisville lost all the Menardi Hall tapes.That can't be reversed?
And that's the whole point. They will rescind the vacate decision SIMPLY because what unc did is a much more egregious violation of what the ncaa is responsible for governing...and there are NO circumstances in which they would take a banner from unc.One always has a choice between what they think is right and wrong. I've read many times in recent years that the NCAA is very reluctant to vacate a title, but UL may just have managed to make themselves the first. And if UL's title finally comes down I would think it wouldn't bode well for UNC.
Hmmm. That's not my impression of the consensus view. I mean, on one hand I think I get where you're coming from: the UNC case and s about academic fraud, which goes to the very heart of student athletics, which is what the NCAA is supposed to be about.And that's the whole point. They will rescind the vacate decision SIMPLY because what unc did is a much more egregious violation of what the ncaa is responsible for governing...and there are NO circumstances in which they would take a banner from unc.
And that's a problem. IMO, the unc issue resulted in their players not being required to take and pass legitimate courses in order to remain eligible, whereas they did/do at other universities. This gives them a competitive advantage. However, as you say, they apparently made these bogus courses available to non-athletes. SO....they will skate with the ncaa, but the truth is that it certainly or should tarnish the university's academic reputation. Which, in reality, would be a much bigger issue for the university's alums and potential future graduates......Hmmm. That's not my impression of the consensus view. I mean, on one hand I think I get where you're coming from: the UNC case and s about academic fraud, which goes to the very heart of student athletics, which is what the NCAA is supposed to be about.
But whatever you think of each case, Louisville's #HookersInDorms scandal was about providing benefits solely to athletes. Making it squarely in the purview of the NCAA. The fake classes at UNC were not provided just to athletes, which creates questions as to whether it's an appropriate issue for the NCAA.
I'll simply say " do NOT set the couch on fire in the formal living room" and just leave it at that.As long as we're telling stories....When my dad was a kid, attending a one-room school in Rowan County, the teacher would ask him to go out and cut a switch to administer corporal punishment. One day he went and got a dry one, cut rings around it with his knife. When the teacher whacked the kid it broke into about 10 pieces and flew all over the schoolhouse. I'm guessing he was next.
Same rules as in football. Requires video evidence to overturn the call. Sadly Louisvillelostdestroyed all the Menardi Hall tapes.
Prepare to be shocked.I'd be shocked if they take the banner.
Thanks. I do it for sport.I no longer post on the main CBB. @Shawn (uk7spd) and @jarms24 continue to carry the torch. Shawn has laid waste to the asinine word vomit of the UL trash that posts there and it's hysterical. Someway and somehow, the arguments from fans of that cesspool program get dumber and dumber.
Just wanted to post that and say keep up the good work.
Just think, if Louisville didn't have a racist that dared to ask for "clean white girls", we would have never known about this.It would appear the "no value" argument has been UL's contention from the get go and through their initial interview's/negotiations with the NCAA. COI obviously didn't buy it and carefully laid out the punishment to make the argument null and void. UL has to stick with it, because they don't really have any else of substance (not that the no value argument has any).
Since it is obvious that the "no value" argument isn't going to fly, UL has also introduced emotional BS of "don't hurt the innocent kids". First it was the innocent kids who never went to the parties like Hancock, and then the even more absurd contention of the innocent kids who were forced into it, like Russ Smith and Chane Behannon. They must have been handcuffed to the bed. LOL!. The innocent kids slant has practically no merit however since all of the players, whether they went or not, had to have known what was going on and therefore are very culpable for not reporting it to Rick (snicker, snicker). Seriously, why would such a fine upstanding young man, and team leader, like Luke Hancock not report this stuff to Rick??? Not even an anonymous note slid under his office door???
UL is also trying to hide behind their self imposed punishment as "sufficient". To me the big fallacy/irony in this is that said punishment has really only "hurt the innocent kids". The post season ban hurt the players, most of whom weren't there for the parties and the ones who were (Mathiang, etc.) weren't there the whole 4 year period.
What UL hasn't done is self punish the people who were responsible for the mess. Like Rick for instance, and his assistants, and gasp(!), even Sir Tom the Righteous himself. Andre McGee got his I suppose, losing his $75k (speculation on my part) assistant's salary from wherever it was. But Rick is still getting his cabillion dollar a year salary and I assume his assistant's are nicely compensated as well.
The whole facade that "nobody knew except AM and a handful of players" is so beyond laughable I don't know what to say. And even if by the most miraculous of miracles that Rick didn't know, the undisputable fact that he should have is only slightly less culpable than if he did know. Either scenario would cost him his job along with his assistants at practically any other university.
The fact that Rick and Tom can't even remotely acknowledge the fact that they should have known, and therefore bear some responsibility, along with the other defiant tone they have taken since the punishments were announced (and probably during their interviews with NCAA) is a large reason they are in the situation they are in today. The FF and title banners are coming down.
The only way they could have remotely had a chance to save them would have been for Rick to resign (back communicated to the NCAA as forced out) immediately following the season of the self imposed tourney ban. At that point it was obvious to the world that UL was admitting to at least a significant portion of the allegations. But they decided to play hardball and now find themselves hiding behind "don't punish the innocent kids". So beyond shameful, I really don't know what else to say.
It won't be reversed.That can't be reversed?
Just think, if Louisville didn't have a racist that dared to ask for "clean white girls", we would have never known about this.
I understand what you are going thru. Reminds me exactly of that filth with Bill Clinton & Monica Lewinsky. I remember that I would be sitting in a room with my 9 year old niece at the time & that gutter, filth would come on tv and it was so embarrassing that I would change the channel as fast as I could. It would serve UL right if they got the death penaltyGood question. UL won't be dealing with the fair board this time.
My 7 year old is well aware of my distaste for UL. The other day she asked "what's so bad about Louisville" Sad part was they're so dirty I couldn't even tell her.
One way to look at it is that total disregard for the program is a bigger slap in the face to them than the constant attention they get. To take a position of "you're not significant", "yeah, you've had some nice little accomplishments" or even a "your team doesn't merit our having a conversation" is more degrading than constantly casting perjoratives or belittling them.Anyone think the posters who are obviously hoping UL keeps the banner move onto some other obscure subtle "anti UK " jargon whilst pretending to be a super duper UK fan?
Nope. Still drunk on the Kool-Aid.Has there been ANY UL fan sightings that are actually mad at Jurich and Pitino.