"As I said in the other thread, I am unaware of when this became a UT/UK comparison. By all means, have at it. Keep in mind, you can't aknowledge the fact that many of our recruits never even made it to school yet still call it a top-10 class nationally."
Look at the title of the thread, dummy. I showed you where HALF of UK's meager number of four stars made it to UK, and you still can't acknowledge that UK had TWO four stars that contributed over the past three years while UT had about 20 on the team at all times, most of them contributing. Not to mention the contributions that you did get from the EIGHT five star commits you had.
The Rivals commit list above show that UT had EIGHT five star commits in the past four years, while UK had one---in the last century. You had THIRTY FIVE four star commits the past four years, UK had SIX that set a foot on campus. It is UT's fault if the caliber of recruits they bring in can't stay our of trouble or pass their classes, but they still had a TON more that played than UK did. When teams with that disparity in talent end up with the same record they DID underachieve. Greatly.
Don't you have more important things to do than show your stupidity on our board? I would think the article about the Orange Pride that all of you have pooh poohed all this time would be of a lot more interest to you. You aren't out of the woods on the thugs that you turned loose in Knoxville yet either, I would guess. Unless everyone was paid off. But then that is very plausible.
Go away, I can't waste any more time arguing with someone that can't recognize facts.
Look at the title of the thread, dummy. I showed you where HALF of UK's meager number of four stars made it to UK, and you still can't acknowledge that UK had TWO four stars that contributed over the past three years while UT had about 20 on the team at all times, most of them contributing. Not to mention the contributions that you did get from the EIGHT five star commits you had.
The Rivals commit list above show that UT had EIGHT five star commits in the past four years, while UK had one---in the last century. You had THIRTY FIVE four star commits the past four years, UK had SIX that set a foot on campus. It is UT's fault if the caliber of recruits they bring in can't stay our of trouble or pass their classes, but they still had a TON more that played than UK did. When teams with that disparity in talent end up with the same record they DID underachieve. Greatly.
Don't you have more important things to do than show your stupidity on our board? I would think the article about the Orange Pride that all of you have pooh poohed all this time would be of a lot more interest to you. You aren't out of the woods on the thugs that you turned loose in Knoxville yet either, I would guess. Unless everyone was paid off. But then that is very plausible.
Go away, I can't waste any more time arguing with someone that can't recognize facts.