UL-Auburn
- Thread starter DrH. Lecter
- Start date
No offense to you personally, but your last two posts are two of the most idiotic things I've ever read.
Well let's see muck, 7 out of your last 15 posts were on, you guessed it, UofL threads. Wow Puzzy, you love you some Tardinal action!You talk about obsessed, yet you've been posing as a UK fan for almost 1500 posts. You can't get any more obsessed than that my friend. Come on out of the closet Puzzy. You've never fooled anyone anyway.![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
On first impression Lamar Jackson if he keeps his head down, work hard can be a very special player...another 4* QB from Miami...like another 4* QB from Miami.
Really like Samuel, Peete and Christian as true Freshmen...played 9 Freshmen last Saturday and going into this Saturday looking at 5 Freshmen starting on offense and have no issue with it...
The link I provided takes you directly to the NCAA website. I would assume that if they were counting that it would show up on their site. I am assuming you have some statement from the NCAA? I searched and found nothing so far.
Well. I can only say that is a pretty subjective comment. Not sure how you can say Jackson is the best player on the field. Maybe on that day, given what Auburn had planned on doing, he was the best. I can guarantee this, now teams will plan for Jackson so I am not sure you can necessarily expect a repeat. I remember last year when JoJo Kemp did the same thing to South Carolina running the wildcat. The problem is that Jackson played great but it was quite one dimensional. It looked to me like he made some great plays but Auburn also didn't seem to adjust. They kind of kept their same game plan and didn't adjust to Petrino's adjustments.
um people dont hate UK football fans. Its funny, you (UK fans) go to georgia for a basketball game and people let you know they hate UK basketball but go to a football game and they treat you very well.
[QUOTE="Senore2006, post: 2222682, member: 1418, I take pride in my ignorance.[/QUOTE]
Spoken like a true tard fan.
Spoken like a true tard fan.
Spoken like a true tard fan.[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I would hate thinking I didn't fit in here. I am quite social by nature.
Honestly, I would hate thinking I didn't fit in here. I am quite social by nature.[/QUOTE]
Yes a lot of your commuter school brethren post here so you fit in with them quite well. If ignorance is bliss tard fans must be positively giddy.
Subjective, yes. But CBS named him the player of the game, so it was not just UofL fans who thought so.
Cats78, I'm glad I could add a little idiocy to your day. My take is this: why is it so hard for people to tip their hat to the strides that UofL has made with their program? I HATE UofL as much as anyone. Hell, I root for anyone that plays against them in any sport. I loath Tom Jurich, the linebeards, the Crown Royal/Trinity High gangstas, the fans, and the school in general. In short, I HATE UofL.
Having said that, they have done a great job with their football program. Are they a perennial power? No, but they are in the top half of the ACC which is a far cry from the Conference USA days. UofL's success in football has forced Barnhardt's hand and the Joker years made it urgent. I honestly believe Stoops is about to take UK to a level not seen since the late 70's and Bear Bryant days. We have legitimate football coaches now, and they keep bringing in SEC caliber talent year after year.
As for the 1950 championship: We beat Oklahoma in the Sugar Bowl. We ended their streak, and we are the champs. It's common sense. The AP poll back then was out before the bowl games. I have ZERO problem with UK claiming that title because that Tennesee team had two losses even though they beat us. I don't need Jeff Sagarin to tell me that. The NCAA website used to list the Sagarin champs for each year, but they took it off for some reason. No matter, UK is the 1950 national champs.
So with all of this really, really, and I mean really impressive background, how did you manage to turn out to be such a loser?
What time does Kindergarten finish? I want to walk home with you guys.
And a pervert as well it seems.
My first trick, bluehomer, was learning how to make a legible post.
I'll be glad to invest a day or two with you to teach you this elusive art.
I've raised children, lol, something you apparently have yet to do. Honestly - trust me on this - the scene of an adult man walking with a small child is not necessarily always perverted. That your interpretation says it is says much more about you than it does about me, I am afraid.
What time does Kindergarten finish? I want to walk home with you guys.
And a pervert as well it seems.
My first trick, bluehomer, was learning how to make a legible post.
I'll be glad to invest a day or two with you to teach you this elusive art.
I've raised children, lol, something you apparently have yet to do. Honestly - trust me on this - the scene of an adult man walking with a small child is not necessarily always perverted. That your interpretation says it is says much more about you than it does about me, I am afraid.
Jackson was still 8-20 for 100 yards and a int. He has a long way to go as a QB.
Auburn took the foot off the gas, plain and simple.
Auburn took the foot off the gas, plain and simple.
Auburn most certainly did not take their foot off of the gas. That's just crazy talk. Jackson was simply a game changer. I seem to recall many of you poo pooing Teddy Bridgewater's early performances as well. I will just warn you to be careful with that. Jackson is the real deal.
Sorry for my comments being buried in the "quote" as I freely admit I don't post very much and am not as message board savvy as others. Very impressive nonetheless that you were still able to somewhat figure it out. Yet another bullet to add to your "why I'm so awesome list". And no, there is absolutely nothing that you can teach me. Nothing at all.
As for my first post in this thread, I'm more than happy to further elaborate just in case you didn't get all of it due to its illegible nature.
You are a rival fan hanging out on a rival's message board with flaming being the only intention, and you are only here because of your team's recent success in the series. Then for reasons known only to you, you feel compelled to tell us how really, really awesome you are in response to criticism. That's the "loser" part.
Secondly, an anonymous poster making overtures to complete strangers about walking kids home from kindergarten comes off as a little perverse to me. Since you are a parent like myself, it's interesting what your interpretation of posting something like that says about you, I am afraid.
In closing, I fully admit that my purpose of responding to you is to hopefully have the moderators boot you off this site, just as I successfully did years ago on one of the old UK Scout boards. I'll take the chance of speaking for all of us here and state that the elimination of your arrogant and sniveling drivel on this site is for the better. Save it for your buddies over at ILBV.
Nice story saying that they took their foot off the gas even though that was not what the Auburn coaches and players were saying after the game
All I know is the kid coming out of HS was a legit 4*and Jim McElwain and the Florida Gators wanted him real bad and it was somewhat of a surprise that he didn't flip to them...also Petrino has said even with his rocket arm he can make all the throws required for his offense...we shall see in the coming weeks.
As for the Bridgewater comments...very correct on that.. he had many doubters here after his Freshmen year...now he is one of the best young QB in Pro Football
As always with any player... the proof is always on the pudding as the saying goes
The sample size is still too small for the Louisville Freshmen that now play on offense...5 currently play huge roles in the skilled positions and offensive line...will have a much better feel in about 4 weeks
I do not know what Auburn's mindset was, but teams usually do not admit to taking their foot off the accelerator when they get a big lead and lose it.
Since I do not watch Otis play I can't say one way or the other about Jackson or the game, but I find it hard to believe that up 24 -0 that Aub wasn't playing some 2nd and 3rd string players
Both teams took some injuries in the game. Auburn had 2 RBs leave the game, but Peyton Barber carried for 115 yards with them on the sideline. Auburn also missed their star LBer and a starting safety in the second half. What other backups were in the mix? An Auburn fan may know.
Well, gee, if you feel that way about it. I hate when my insincerity boils over. I feel like I'm the bug under the microscope. There is no substitute for clarity of purpose, however - it was getting a bit boring over here anyway.
UL evidently held Auburn to the lowest offensive numbers since Mahlzahn arrived. But, how good is Auburn's offense? It struggled today for most of the game in OT with Jax St. And then, Houston hangs 34 and 462 (247 passing and 226 rushing, along with a big ST day) total yards on UL. Houston has a tough offense, but that seems like a big day on your opponent's turf.
A) The UL fans in this thread have gone missing.
B) Just to point out the type of fans you all are debating with, they say the Florida game was total domination. They win by 10.
They gave auburn all they can handle. Lost by 7. Which one is it?!?!
Then they talk about the timeline people use for comparisons. In basketball they conveniently always compare teams since 1980 in every argument. They say that's the modern era. Yet we win a title two years prior. Makes sense. (Insert sarcasm). I guess it's easier to talk using even numbered years like 2nd graders even though the true modern era was the use of the 3 point line in 1986-87 season which would mean they only have one title in the modern era. But when UK brings up the past 8 years in history in football, oh we're just throwing out any year to help out our argument!!?!?
But yet when we use a similar point we're "typical UK fans" which no one can really describe to me. It's a phrase they use but yet don't know what it means. It's so cliche.
Anyway, nice job with Houston today. Looks like you all gave them all they could handle. I guess 3 more points for Houston and they would have totally dominated UofL.
B) Just to point out the type of fans you all are debating with, they say the Florida game was total domination. They win by 10.
They gave auburn all they can handle. Lost by 7. Which one is it?!?!
Then they talk about the timeline people use for comparisons. In basketball they conveniently always compare teams since 1980 in every argument. They say that's the modern era. Yet we win a title two years prior. Makes sense. (Insert sarcasm). I guess it's easier to talk using even numbered years like 2nd graders even though the true modern era was the use of the 3 point line in 1986-87 season which would mean they only have one title in the modern era. But when UK brings up the past 8 years in history in football, oh we're just throwing out any year to help out our argument!!?!?
But yet when we use a similar point we're "typical UK fans" which no one can really describe to me. It's a phrase they use but yet don't know what it means. It's so cliche.
Anyway, nice job with Houston today. Looks like you all gave them all they could handle. I guess 3 more points for Houston and they would have totally dominated UofL.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
New Uniform Colors coming to Kentucky Basketball?- Latest: kywildcatsfannumber1
-
-
-
