Lmao how many years have they missed the tournament?! Also, two years they won it, they were a bubble team. 🤣so what you’re saying is UCONN has won 5 titles without being the top seed? Seems like a blue blood to me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lmao how many years have they missed the tournament?! Also, two years they won it, they were a bubble team. 🤣so what you’re saying is UCONN has won 5 titles without being the top seed? Seems like a blue blood to me
I know what you are saying, but you can do it the other way as well. Prior to 1999, UK had 7 titles to UConn's 0.Has taken the top spot for the best blue blood. Two games away from their 6th title since 1999, Kentucky has 1 in that time…. Just unreal what they have been accomplishing, props to them.
I know. I'm just saying it's not like UK hasn't done anything since 2000 lol.Normally I agree with what you say, but not on this. With the amount of talent that has come through this program over the decades, ONE TITLE in the 21st century (25 years) is not good.
Look at there path to a title this year. It’s freaking laughable.
Just annoying hearing that crap. ''ARE THEY A NEW BLUEBLOOD''??? Just grates my eyes when I read it.It's kind of weird the discussion on here about blueblood not blueblood
Ask Uconn fans if they give one damn about that kind of stuff while they are enjoying all of the titles they have been winning post 2000.
Then the question is becomes is todays college basketball landscape harder than it was before the 2000’s. I don’t know the answer to that. But still having almost 6 titles since 1999 is a great accomplishment. Kentucky has one under Cal in his 16 year coaching career at UKI know what you are saying, but you can do it the other way as well. Prior to 1999, UK had 7 titles to UConn's 0.
No UK fan would ask "are we still a blueblood" based on a 5 year stretch when you've built the rest of the resume over a century. Bunch of clowns taking advantage of a free forum.I know what you are saying, but you can do it the other way as well. Prior to 1999, UK had 7 titles to UConn's 0.
I get you, but we are RAPIDLY approaching territory of "has been", where we're going to laughed out of any room that we claim we're THE program. Thanks, Cal.I know. I'm just saying it's not like UK hasn't done anything since 2000 lol.
You are missing the definition of blueblood. A lot of people use it interchangeably these days with “elite programs” or “top 5 programs” etc. but that’s not the root definition of the word.I mean if they win a championship then they will be tied with UNC for the third most. Also why is Kentucky still considered a blue blood if they’ve only won 1 championships since 1998?
You clearly dont understand the definition of a blueblood.I mean if they win a championship then they will be tied with UNC for the third most. Also why is Kentucky still considered a blue blood if they’ve only won 1 championships since 1998?
Probably the same dork that wrote Oakland a check after they beat us. He said he doubled what he usually pays for whoever knocks us out, so I imagine the check was for $ 2.You clearly dont understand the definition of a blueblood.
The Great JVC🤦♂️Don't forget. HOFCJVC gave them 2 titles.
Sucks for you that nobody sees it your way no matter how hard you try to belittle UK. Dan Patrick is as good as they get and he said the other day that it doesn't matter how many titles Ucon wins, nobody tunes in to watch them lose and never will wheras people literally drop everything to watch UK, hoping they'll lose.UNC - 3 since 2000
Duke- 3 since 2000
Kansas- 2 since 2000
UCONN- 4 since 2000
Kentucky - 1 since 2000
UCONN should be considered a blue blood
So it’s a requirement to be elite after the internet?! Lmfao okay.I would say modern day blue blood, but yeah, they are an elite basketball destination program.
Nobody gives a flat f8ck about who was elite when USSR was around. UL was elite then and so was Indiana.
Elite before the internet amounts to fly shit on frog's ass.
It literally doesn't do us any good.
"Don't call Uconn elite...history...they haven't been around long enough" sounds about like "don't invest in Amazon, or google, or bitcoin...they haven't been around"
How can you be against UConn when Duke is still alive? As long as Duke is still playing, I'm all for UConn. Hope Purdue can make it and give them a game in the title game.It’s official. I’m permanently against UConn.
I understand that but why is it that these other blue blood programs have won more than 1 title since 2000 but Kentucky hasn’t? Kentucky is obviously a blue blood no question about it..Sucks for you that nobody sees it your way no matter how hard you try to belittle UK. Dan Patrick is as good as they get and he said the other day that it doesn't matter how many titles Ucon wins, nobody tunes in to watch them lose and never will wheras people literally drop everything to watch UK, hoping they'll lose.
But by all means, ware yourself out from the West end of Louisville on a Saturday night.
Lmao how many years have they missed the tournament?! Also, two years they won it, they were a bubble team. 🤣
Who did their freaking coach play for?How can you be against UConn when Duke is still alive? As long as Duke is still playing, I'm all for UConn. Hope Purdue can make it and give them a game in the title game.
We had a very nice path this year. We just didn't capitalize on it. Thanks Cal.😡At this rate, about two years.
Some people used to say that about UK when CM Newton was sitting in the big chair. I don't know if Mitch had single thing to do with it, but our path wasn't exactly bad this year. It just turns out we have a **** for brains coach.
All he had to do was zone.
They're trying to win their sixth title in 25 years. That's damn impressive considering how freaking hard the NCAA tourney is.Lmao how many years have they missed the tournament?! Also, two years they won it, they were a bubble team. 🤣
Yet we still have more than all of them despite the drought. Go dig up some more dirt/rumors. See ya.I understand that but why is it that these other blue blood programs have won more than 1 title since 2000 but Kentucky hasn’t? Kentucky is obviously a blue blood no question about it..
That is a foreign language to ccc, just like winningAll he had to do was zone.
You're thinking of his brother but, yeah, I get it. I don't like them either. But would I rather them win than Duke? Absolutely. Not even close.Who did their freaking coach play for?
That makes 3 titles Cal lost do to free throws. You'd think it sink in through even THAT think of a skull by now.All we had to do was make free throws. 13/24. Makes me sick. We have lost two national championships from the foul line.
That makes 3 titles Cal lost do to free throws. You'd think it sink in through even THAT think of a skull by now.