I just noticed duke having yet another easy home game today and got to thinking when do they actually play a decent road team in the ACC. Well I looked up the ACC and outside of duke and carolina its pretty much worthless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hasn’t stopped Duke or Carolina’s rise in the polls either. Would not surprise me if they both end up a 1 seed. See no way either drops below a 2 seed.I just noticed duke having yet another easy home game today and got to thinking when do they actually play a decent road team in the ACC. Well I looked up the ACC and outside of duke and carolina its pretty much worthless.
Happens every year in the ACC. ASPN talking heads proper up any team that starts out decent pre conference in the acc like they are the 97 Bulls. This year Miami, Clemson and I‘ve even heard them propping up Wake Forest. Happens every year. ASPN, just cause they say it must be true right 😂Especially since Miami and Clemson have proved to be underwhelming
Hasn’t stopped Duke or Carolina’s rise in the polls either. Would not surprise me if they both end up a 1 seed. See no way either drops below a 2 seed.
I totally agree. ESPN will worship Duke and push them to be a one seed.I just noticed duke having yet another easy home game today and got to thinking when do they actually play a decent road team in the ACC. Well I looked up the ACC and outside of duke and carolina its pretty much worthless.
I doubt both get 1’s as well but they are both likely to be no lower than a 2 and likely one of them will indeed be a 1. If the committee took metrics into the full equation as you suggest neither would be an above a 3 or 4. Duke is 1-1 against the current top 25 and the only top 25 team it plays the rest of the year is UNC. UNC is currently 2-2 against the current top 25 and also only faces top 25 Duke twice the rest of the year. If both of them skate through the ACC with only losses to each other they will enter ACCT play with 4 losses each. Kidding yourself if you don’t think the committee would give both a one seed in that scenario especially if other P5 conference contenders have 6 losses or more.0 chance both are 1s. The committee can look at the conference metrics just like we can.
So he retired?UNCheat though is good. I don't want to face them again. I'm already having nightmares about meeting them in a regional final and The Rooferee coming out of retirement to ref.
ThankfullySo he retired?
Now he starting Zan, man I’m starting to think Kenny wants UofL fans to hate him.Louisville started zan payne today that should tell you everything about that conference
I doubt both get 1’s as well but they are both likely to be no lower than a 2 and likely one of them will indeed be a 1. If the committee took metrics into the full equation as you suggest neither would be an above a 3 or 4. Duke is 1-1 against the current top 25 and the only top 25 team it plays the rest of the year is UNC. UNC is currently 2-2 against the current top 25 and also only faces top 25 Duke twice the rest of the year. If both of them skate through the ACC with only losses to each other they will enter ACCT play with 4 losses each. Kidding yourself if you don’t think the committee would give both a one seed in that scenario especially if other P5 conference contenders have 6 losses or more.
They will be lucky to get 4 teams in lol. It's pretty bad.
Duke gets swept by Carolina and they will be in panic mode with their coachWell Duke lost at home to Pitt so they are at 4 losses already. They aren't good enough to win out and will probably get swept by UNC. I'd say 3 or 4 sees for them.
Now UNC is a problem. They probably won't lose but 1 to 2 games tops. The committee should give a 6 or 7 loss sec champ a 1 over a 5 loss acc champ, especially if said sec champ is UK that beat UNC. If it's UT I'd give it to UNC since they beat UT.
I prefaced my post with IF. Glad Duke lost at home. Duke is a good team but not great. I think they will end up ACC play with maybe 4-5 losses and still get a better seed than they deserve. Probably are a 5-6 seed but will end up a 3 or 4 or worst.Well Duke lost at home to Pitt so they are at 4 losses already. They aren't good enough to win out and will probably get swept by UNC. I'd say 3 or 4 sees for them.
Now UNC is a problem. They probably won't lose but 1 to 2 games tops. The committee should give a 6 or 7 loss sec champ a 1 over a 5 loss acc champ, especially if said sec champ is UK that beat UNC. If it's UT I'd give it to UNC since they beat UT.
The only problem I see with UNC is RJ Davis has to do everything for them offensively, if he is off even a little they go into long droughts. If he has a dry period then UNC could struggle. Ryan & Ingram aren’t number one scoring option those guys either, and bacot has progressively gotten worseWell Duke lost at home to Pitt so they are at 4 losses already. They aren't good enough to win out and will probably get swept by UNC. I'd say 3 or 4 sees for them.
Now UNC is a problem. They probably won't lose but 1 to 2 games tops. The committee should give a 6 or 7 loss sec champ a 1 over a 5 loss acc champ, especially if said sec champ is UK that beat UNC. If it's UT I'd give it to UNC since they beat UT.