ADVERTISEMENT

Super Important to Stay a 3 Seed

Tampa_cat54

Senior
Apr 22, 2011
6,636
12,168
113
I think this year in particular, it's incredibly important to stay a 3 seed.

The difference between the 1 seeds and 2 seeds this year is noticeable.

Auburn
Alabama
Duke
Florida

Those are almost certainly going to be the 1 seeds.

The 2 seeds will probably be some combination of:

Tennessee
Houston
Wisconsin
Iowa State
Texas A&M
Texas Tech

The talent difference between the potential 1s and potential 2s is pretty large IMO.

Beyond just avoiding a dreaded 12/5 or 13/4 matchup, we could also avoid that batch of 1 seeds for another round, three of which (hell, maybe all FOUR) could be seeking revenge against us. (I'm calling our shot now, we're going to beat Auburn in Rupp).

So it's super, super important to avoid dropping to a 4 seed or lower.

Means we HAVE to beat OU and LSU obviously, and HAVE to win at least one of the other 3 (Mizzou, Bama, Auburn), and HAVE to make it at least to Friday of the SEC tournament.

If we can beat OU, LSU, Auburn, and then beat a team like Miss State or Ole Miss on Thursday of the SEC Tournament, think we would HAVE to stay on that 3 line.

Is it possible?
 
I think this year in particular, it's incredibly important to stay a 3 seed.

The difference between the 1 seeds and 2 seeds this year is noticeable.

Auburn
Alabama
Duke
Florida

Those are almost certainly going to be the 1 seeds.

The 2 seeds will probably be some combination of:

Tennessee
Houston
Wisconsin
Iowa State
Texas A&M
Texas Tech

The talent difference between the potential 1s and potential 2s is pretty large IMO.

Beyond just avoiding a dreaded 12/5 or 13/4 matchup, we could also avoid that batch of 1 seeds for another round, three of which (hell, maybe all FOUR) could be seeking revenge against us. (I'm calling our shot now, we're going to beat Auburn in Rupp).

So it's super, super important to avoid dropping to a 4 seed or lower.

Means we HAVE to beat OU and LSU obviously, and HAVE to win at least one of the other 3 (Mizzou, Bama, Auburn), and HAVE to make it at least to Friday of the SEC tournament.

If we can beat OU, LSU, Auburn, and then beat a team like Miss State or Ole Miss on Thursday of the SEC Tournament, think we would HAVE to stay on that 3 line.

Is it possible?
More likely we win 2-3 remaining, and get a low 4 seed
 
one thing about those 4 number one seeds. as good as they are, they’re common opponents. to date, we also have a winning record against.
 
Might be better to rest our injured guys the rest of the way and we fall to a 6 seed, if we want to avoid the 1 seed.

Healthy, we are as good or better than all the 2-3 seed candidates, IMHO.

We would still get a fairly good matchup with an 11 seed, then take care of the 3 seed.

Then the 2 seed would be a toss up.

Heck, we get Butler and Robinson back, we might be favored over the 3 and not much of an underdog against the 2.

While a 3 seed would be ideal, a 6 seed seems better than a 4 or 5, because of the difference between the projected 1 and 2 seeds.
 
I think this year in particular, it's incredibly important to stay a 3 seed.

The difference between the 1 seeds and 2 seeds this year is noticeable.

Auburn
Alabama
Duke
Florida

Those are almost certainly going to be the 1 seeds.

The 2 seeds will probably be some combination of:

Tennessee
Houston
Wisconsin
Iowa State
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
5-1 against the teams you are suggesting as the 1 & 2 seeds and 3 losses to teams outside the tournament makes this season one of the most head shakers ever.
 
one thing about those 4 number one seeds. as good as they are, they’re common opponents. to date, we also have a winning record against.

Yeah but that's not what I want. Revenge in the tournament is a real factor (like how Auburn beat us in the Elite Eight after we smoked them 3 times in the season).

I don't want to go into a revenge game where Duke turns it up 6 notches simply because we beat them.

Give me a 2 seeded Wisconsin or Houston team instead and let's ride.
 
Yeah but that's not what I want. Revenge in the tournament is a real factor (like how Auburn beat us in the Elite Eight after we smoked them 3 times in the season).

I don't want to go into a revenge game where Duke turns it up 6 notches simply because we beat them.

Give me a 2 seeded Wisconsin or Houston team instead and let's ride.
everyone can have an opinion, but it doesn’t mean the premise is correct. in terms of matchups, a team like houston is exactly who we don’t want to play. even assuming we’re healthy.
 
everyone can have an opinion, but it doesn’t mean the premise is correct. in terms of matchups, a team like houston is exactly who we don’t want to play. even assuming we’re healthy.

I’ll take my chances against Houston in the Sweet 16. They would be favored, but great offense beats great defense. When our offense is clicking we will be a tough out.
 
I think it's impossible not to envision, of all the Number one seeds, that IF Kentucky falls to a #4 or #5 seed, there will be only one choice to put them into a region with.

dUKe - in the east, of course, of course.

I can't escape that. And I'd take it if they want us to play them again. Sign us up.

that is all.

Go Big Blue !
 
With the schedule we have left I highly doubt there is any chance to stay a 3 seed.

Almost a lock to lose at Bama and going to be heavy dogs at Auburn and a likely decent size dog at Missouri.

Even if we beat Oklahoma which will likely be a 50/50 game that be likely 3 more losses then add 1 more in the SEC tournament.

That gives us 12 losses you think 12 loss team is getting a 3 seed ?

We will be lucky to get a 4 seed with 12 losses.

Now if we somehow miracle a win vs Bama or Auburn or beat Missouri then things change if we also beat LSU and Oklahoma as well.
 
With the schedule we have left I highly doubt there is any chance to stay a 3 seed.

Almost a lock to lose at Bama and going to be heavy dogs at Auburn and a likely decent size dog at Missouri.

Even if we beat Oklahoma which will likely be a 50/50 game that be likely 3 more losses then add 1 more in the SEC tournament.

That gives us 12 losses you think 12 loss team is getting a 3 seed ?

We will be lucky to get a 4 seed with 12 losses.

Now if we somehow miracle a win vs Bama or Auburn or beat Missouri then things change if we also beat LSU and Oklahoma as well.
We don’t play at Auburn and won’t be a heavy dog at home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CGblue
Not to mention the 12/13 seeds are a lot harder to beat than the 14 (Last year notwithstanding)

Yep.

I figure there's a couple things going against 4s and 5s the way this thing is set up.

1) All the good locations close to home are usually taken by that time and your forced to play quite a bit of distance sometimes even being closer to the 12/13 seed.

2) The 12s are usually the last at large teams which you figure if they are the teams on the right side of the bubble and probably playing their best basketball at the time March rolls around.
 
With the schedule we have left I highly doubt there is any chance to stay a 3 seed.

Almost a lock to lose at Bama and going to be heavy dogs at Auburn and a likely decent size dog at Missouri.

Even if we beat Oklahoma which will likely be a 50/50 game that be likely 3 more losses then add 1 more in the SEC tournament.

That gives us 12 losses you think 12 loss team is getting a 3 seed ?

We will be lucky to get a 4 seed with 12 losses.

Now if we somehow miracle a win vs Bama or Auburn or beat Missouri then things change if we also beat LSU and Oklahoma as well.

Literally all we would need to do is win one of those 3 that you mentioned (Bama, home vs. Auburn, Mizzou), and then one in the SEC Tournament, and we would finish the season with a MINIMUM of ELEVEN Quad-1 wins, and only ONE loss outside of Q1.

Only looking at the number of losses is not the way to evaluate resume.

A team with ELEVEN Q1 wins, only ONE loss in Q2, and 8 Quad 1A wins, including all 8 of them being Top-15, and what would be a 6-2 record against teams seeded either 1 or 2, is a resume that gets you a 3 seed.

It's WAY more possible than you think.

And I think we are going to beat Auburn in Rupp, we SHOULD be fully healthy by then.
 
I think this year in particular, it's incredibly important to stay a 3 seed.

The difference between the 1 seeds and 2 seeds this year is noticeable.

Auburn
Alabama
Duke
Florida

Those are almost certainly going to be the 1 seeds.

The 2 seeds will probably be some combination of:

Tennessee
Houston
Wisconsin
Iowa State
Texas A&M
Texas Tech

The talent difference between the potential 1s and potential 2s is pretty large IMO.

Beyond just avoiding a dreaded 12/5 or 13/4 matchup, we could also avoid that batch of 1 seeds for another round, three of which (hell, maybe all FOUR) could be seeking revenge against us. (I'm calling our shot now, we're going to beat Auburn in Rupp).

So it's super, super important to avoid dropping to a 4 seed or lower.

Means we HAVE to beat OU and LSU obviously, and HAVE to win at least one of the other 3 (Mizzou, Bama, Auburn), and HAVE to make it at least to Friday of the SEC tournament.

If we can beat OU, LSU, Auburn, and then beat a team like Miss State or Ole Miss on Thursday of the SEC Tournament, think we would HAVE to stay on that 3 line.

Is it possible?
Jones said on KSR today he thought the staff is managing the injury situation as best they can to be in position for a 3 seed so I think you’re on to something. Good call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImTheVillageIdiot
Literally all we would need to do is win one of those 3 that you mentioned (Bama, home vs. Auburn, Mizzou), and then one in the SEC Tournament, and we would finish the season with a MINIMUM of ELEVEN Quad-1 wins, and only ONE loss outside of Q1.

Only looking at the number of losses is not the way to evaluate resume.

A team with ELEVEN Q1 wins, only ONE loss in Q2, and 8 Quad 1A wins, including all 8 of them being Top-15, and what would be a 6-2 record against teams seeded either 1 or 2, is a resume that gets you a 3 seed.

It's WAY more possible than you think.

And I think we are going to beat Auburn in Rupp, we SHOULD be fully healthy by then.
Ding ding ding. To most CBB fans who follow the sport closely, the reaction to that is “duh!” but the chicken little mentality prevents the slightest sign of light from peering its way through the basement door for many.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tampa_cat54
Might be better to rest our injured guys the rest of the way and we fall to a 6 seed, if we want to avoid the 1 seed.

Healthy, we are as good or better than all the 2-3 seed candidates, IMHO.

We would still get a fairly good matchup with an 11 seed, then take care of the 3 seed.

Then the 2 seed would be a toss up.

Heck, we get Butler and Robinson back, we might be favored over the 3 and not much of an underdog against the 2.

While a 3 seed would be ideal, a 6 seed seems better than a 4 or 5, because of the difference between the projected 1 and 2 seeds.
Harder to defend losing to drop to your desired seed than trying to win to get a desired seed. I know you’re not suggesting throwing games but implying the coaches/team aren’t worried about losing some of the next games would be a bad look and would hurt morale and momentum. Better to go for it and get a less desirable 4 or 5 seed than tank to a 6.
 
You all forget what other teams do matters as much as we do when you lose games. Maybe we don't move down if we lose to Bama or Auburn but that doesn't mean another team can't win and pass us up.

We don't play the seeding game in a vacuum you can't say you lose 2 games you expect to lose so you don't move down. It always depends on what others around you do.
 
5-1 against the teams you are suggesting as the 1 & 2 seeds and 3 losses to teams outside the tournament makes this season one of the most head shakers ever.
It definitely is.

Looking at the bubble teams, so many of them gave UK as their best win (Ohio State, UGA, Arkansas, Texas… ).

Injuries suck, but we should have beaten all those teams.
 
You all forget what other teams do matters as much as we do when you lose games. Maybe we don't move down if we lose to Bama or Auburn but that doesn't mean another team can't win and pass us up.

We don't play the seeding game in a vacuum you can't say you lose 2 games you expect to lose so you don't move down. It always depends on what others around you do.
What teams are you saying would pass UK? Seems like the teams right behind us have more warts than we do
 
Just make the tournament and win a game or two. The rest is gravy considering the injuries and throwing together a team in a few weeks. Some of you just live in misery and no matter what Kentucky has done it isn’t good enough. The crowd that is always hyping up the next game as a Must Win. We are in the dang tournament and that is all the majority of fans wanted before the season started and win a game or two. Our best chance to do that is rest Butler and Jaxson as much as possible. At this point play for the tournament.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT