data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50a5b/50a5bb6d03590fc20b7be818d0e296dd220fc3c3" alt="www.marketwatch.com"
Kroger raises dividend by 24%, to boost yield above 2%
Shares of Kroger Co. undefined rose 0.4% in premarket trading Thursday, after the grocery store chain raised its quarterly dividend by 24%. The new dividend...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/248f7/248f736baa7c9754bfd60ba56601ed3025ebaa92" alt="www.marketwatch.com"
I'm 25% long, 25% short, 25% gold and 25% cash
There isn't a real reason to see any significant gains over the next several months so I'm not playing the "buy the dip" game. If a recession is looming, expect these up and down cycles to continue, but the current seems to me to be much more on the downside for the near term.
Sounds like you’re holding your own at least!Up, down , all around……my 100% dividend portfolio just keeps paying.
Shorting any particular sector? I have a few ETFs on my list.I'm 25% long, 25% short, 25% gold and 25% cash
There isn't a real reason to see any significant gains over the next several months so I'm not playing the "buy the dip" game. If a recession is looming, expect these up and down cycles to continue, but the current seems to me to be much more on the downside for the near term.
Quality dividend paying stocks always hold their value much better than the broad market in down cycles, because so long as the divey stays the same, the lower the price of the stock, the higher the percentage of divey to the stock price which makes it more valuable.Up, down , all around……my 100% dividend portfolio just keeps paying.
Quality dividend paying stocks always hold their value much better than the broad market in down cycles, because so long as the divey stays the same, the lower the price of the stock, the higher the percentage of divey to the stock price which makes it more valuable.
Way back in the day I never could seem to allocate them favorably, the bad would lower the good, then market conditions would sometimes change things faster than I could move…eventually went more to individual stocks.In addition to performance, asset allocation, expense ratio, turnover, loads and other fees are also considerations when investing in mutual funds.
High frequency trading had an negative effect as well so they changed the rules. But I recall the Magellan Fund doing very very well for me in my 401k in the 80's and 90's before I was laid off from my first job.Way back in the day I never could seem to allocate them favorably, the bad would lower the good, then market conditions would sometimes change things faster than I could move…eventually went more to individual stocks.
Tremendous fund back in the day, Oakmark another.High frequency trading had an negative effect as well so they changed the rules. But I recall the Magellan Fund doing very very well for me in my 401k in the 80's and 90's before I was laid off from my first job.
Kritikal, my wife and I used to be big travelers, getting long in the tooth, but are going to Spain in late September, the food and driving trips around the country interest us. Ireland was a great trip, SW part and rented an affordable driver. Italy was also fun, more expensive than Ireland, things not as smooth without a driver. Anyway, if in your situation, danged if I wouldn’t consider what I said above. If you’re on Facebook, I can send their pictures, etc, on a recent trip. Mr Market nicer today, but I may do some etf shorting, I just don’t like the trend.Warren Buffett would probably say put it in an S&P 500 fund and forget about it. Nice that you have options. I have a relative in her 50s who loves European travel, so she bought a beautiful gated, small place with her London BF on a Spanish beach resort area an hour or so north of Barcelona for $105,000. She says the food over there is very reasonably priced and excellent, a nice big pool, shops and restaurants are handy, she’s in position to travel over Europe, can lease her place when in the US. Whatever floats your boat.
I don’t own BTC, but it could dip to as far as $10k … that would be a buying opportunity IMO.Buy on the BTC dip yet?
Pretty well known to people who watched or read The Big Short
Michael Burry is a lesser known hedge fund manager that is gaining popularity because he has predicted the last 2 huge down turns and made a ton of money off the first one.
Got SYY recently, food related has to work, huh? Over the years have held IIPR, VALE, ABBV, RBLX, HON, some good ones if patient.Nice PM relief rally! In the past couple months, sold some VGENX, AGG, STWD, DD, RBLX, IIPR on rallys. Other than dollar cost averaging, buying more BX, ABBV, JEPI, VALE, HON on dips. Started new SYY, SRE positions.
The only experience I have is through a brother in law. About 30+ years ago he left a major bank in Lousville to got to work for a banking niche company in Paducah. The company was privately held. The profit sharing portion of his compensation was stock in the company. He did very well without the company ever going public. The founders are multimillionaires.Got a question on Stock Options.
Company my wife works for is essentially offering about 5,000 options, on a monthly vesting cycle, for roughly 0.30 cents each. It's a tech startup company and they do make a good, niche product. We both think it's worth it to pay the $1750 for the stock and just see if it ever amounts to anything.. God forbid the stock ever opens at $5 or something.
But my question is:
If a company is offering stock, especially as an alternative to salary, they should be planning to go public at some point, right? I feel like this would be a shitty practice otherwise and employees wouldn't go for it. And how likely is it that staff at a company go in on these stock options only to never even have the opportunity to "sell it" as the company never goes public? I'm just curious how this plays out once she owns the stock.
My wife doesn't know much about stocks and investing at all, and I'm not great at it either. She asked if this was worth it to buy, and while I think it's definitely worth the risk, it got me thinking.
Why do you feel this way?I feel like this would be a shitty practice otherwise and employees wouldn't go for it.
Not sure where you got the $1750. Assuming you don't want to fork over (5000 x .30 =) $1500, does she have a cashless option? This would only be possible it seems if the stock is worth more than .30 cents. The reason I ask is because of dilution. If you buy 5000, who's to say they need more money down the road and offer employees more options? Theoretically, this would reduce the price of your purchased options. Make sure to see a finance lawyer is probably my best advice.Got a question on Stock Options.
Company my wife works for is essentially offering about 5,000 options, on a monthly vesting cycle, for roughly 0.30 cents each. It's a tech startup company and they do make a good, niche product. We both think it's worth it to pay the $1750 for the stock and just see if it ever amounts to anything.. God forbid the stock ever opens at $5 or something.
But my question is:
If a company is offering stock, especially as an alternative to salary, they should be planning to go public at some point, right? I feel like this would be a shitty practice otherwise and employees wouldn't go for it. And how likely is it that staff at a company go in on these stock options only to never even have the opportunity to "sell it" as the company never goes public? I'm just curious how this plays out once she owns the stock.
My wife doesn't know much about stocks and investing at all, and I'm not great at it either. She asked if this was worth it to buy, and while I think it's definitely worth the risk, it got me thinking.
Maybe these shares are restricted.If the company had no plans to go public and was just doing this as a way to not pay higher salary, that would be shitty, no?
I'm not even sure if companies would do this or not. Im just asking, it appears that if a company offers stock options, instead of pay, there must be some sort of pay off, or something they can entice the workers? Is there any other reason to offer stock options?
Not sure where you got the $1750. Assuming you don't want to fork over (5000 x .30 =) $1500, does she have a cashless option? This would only be possible it seems if the stock is worth more than .30 cents. The reason I ask is because of dillution. If you buy 5000, who's to say they need more money down the road and offer employees more options? Theorectically, this would reduce the price of your purchased options. Make sure to see a finance lawyer is probably my best advice.
The devil's in the details of course. A lawyer can help with that. On your end, determine if she's willing to stay longer term thereby eliminating any vesting period issues of quitting or getting fired before being fully vested.I forget where I got $1750.. I actually think it was like 31 cents or some kind of odd dollar amount. But yeah in that range. Still getting more information.
I think were both willing. We figure it's a worth while risk. But I do need to see more info. My last company never did stock options but instead awarded them out.
The devil's in the details of course. A lawyer can help with that. On your end, determine if she's willing to stay longer term thereby eliminating any vesting period issues of quitting or getting fired before being fully vested.
That's certainly true for the casual investor.No one can consistently time the market. Especially not a casual investor.
Who is not true for, specifically?That's certainly true for the casual investor.