Originally posted by SaguaroCat:
OT.
Apparently Kentucky has recruited so many four star players, we have to measure Marrow's share of them to the third significant digit.
Hopefully the ONE four star from 12 will lead us to the promised land, IF he improves and even starts. But, 0.5% of the seven from Ohio is probably going to contribute more than the ONE four star we got in the 10 and 11 classes, although there is still some hope for Faulkner. The 09 class had TWO four stars that contributed, but both were JCs only here two years. and I didn't see a whole lot from our ONE in the 08 class, Boyd had one good game IIRC. The 07 class, coming after our only break even SEC season year this century, (but mitch told Brooks, no, we can't even replace the folding chairs in the "recruiting room") had ZERO four stars, certainly 0.5% of the seven will have to be better than ZERO. But maybe they made up for it by signing 19 two stars, LOL, but that was topped by the 05 class also with zero four stars but with 22 three stars, with only four three stars, two from Kentucky and two JCs. The TWO four stars in 06, both from Kentucky, certainly had a big influence on UK's defense, and Peters is still playing in the NFL.
UK's main problem this century has been TALENT, not coaching, in fact Brooks did an amazing job with his talent, mostly overlooked and bypassed players. Joker? No, things fell apart pretty fast.
So yes, the seven that Stoops has brought in IS a VERY big deal, and heads should roll if we lose him because of money, JMO, but what the hell is Stoops going to do with all that money, and if I were his financial advisor I would tell him his best chances for making even more millions in the future would be to throw a couple hundred thousand his buddies way.
NOT that their minds seem to work that way, although Brooks and Harbaugh seem to have seen the wisdom in it.
NOT that it should be necessary at all, our AD should have learned something from the past couple of years..