If Louisville players were accused of this we would be bashing them but since it's our own players we make excuses and say even if it's true it's not a big deal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not saying that at all. Based on the news story that was just linked this afternoon, it's a very big deal IF it is true.If Louisville players were accused of this we would be bashing them but since it's our own players we make excuses and say even if it's true it's not a big deal.
It was not a frat house.It was a FRAT HOUSE. Do you even try to know what the situation is before you talk?
Wow that's a big surprise. Can't believe they waited so long to just charge. This case is basically doa
For one thing, it's possible that the students in question, who were interviewed and who provided information to Crawford, were never there in the first place and it's also possible that they are actually U6 students. There are a lot of possibilities as far as this goes. I'm sure your friends on the U6 forum are hoping for the worst case scenario, though.In reading Crawfords report, this is a very serious matter. Information he published would make me wonder why assault, assault and battery and more serious charges weren't there....once again, if true.
This can rank all the way from pretty bad to what in haven's name bad.
For clarity it was alleged that a gun was brandished but that has been disputed. Best not to speculate for right now.It was stupid, but stop acting like the fact that a gun was waived means these guys are evil.
Anything is possible, no doubt. One of the ones he quoted was the one stating the gun. Whether he is a Louisville student or not, I've no clue.For one thing, it's possible that the students in question, who were interviewed and who provided information to Crawford, were never there in the first place and it's also possible that they are actually U6 students. There are a lot of possibilities as far as this goes. I'm sure your friends on the U6 forum are hoping for the worst case scenario, though.
Than head to the border.you don't push your way in someone else's home come do that in my house and they will carry you out in a body bag.
If this was at UT, then this board would be a combination of mockery and wanting the kids hung and program disbanded...A lot of speculation. I’ll wait until the trial/arraignment and more reports come out. I was at UK in a fraternity, when shit went down like this before and was never even reported. A lot of drunk guys, hurt feelings and bad decisions.
UK has cleared them and they have more reliable info than any of us.
If Louisville players were accused of this we would be bashing them but since it's our own players we make excuses and say even if it's true it's not a big deal.
If this was at UT, then this board would be a combination of mockery and wanting the kids hung and program disbanded...
From what i understand they were invited and while there got into it and fought with said frat. They came back after the factAre you serious? The football players caused every bit of this. They were not invited and one of them thinks he is Wyatt Earp and shows up with a firearm.
If they ever play another down at UK that would be a shame. Get them out of town and away from students at a university.
y message board cyber counselor The Hack take over here at this legal hairsplitting.
Just like we cannot group all football players in a group one cannot lump/group all frat boys in a stereotypical group, but let me tell you I’ve seen frat boys gang on people to many times to mention in my college experience As recently as our first hone game last football season. A bunch of rowdy and loud mouthed Ole Miss clowns all wearing a ball caps that looks like it was drug up 65 north then put on right before they walked in. Drunk ,Loud and trying to intimidate the folks setting next to them in they’re flip flops. They got a Kentucky lesson that went just shy of getting physical. And got forced to act right by everyone around. Anyway . Not that that incident means squat as far as relating directly to this case. I guess what I’m saying is if a drunk group of any ethnicity or clique making crazy threats and being backed up with enough young punks just waiting to show how loyal they are , then in a split second most anyone with access to a piece would pull it in my opinion just to keep safe and use the thing just as a show of force Incase of an attack.
I subscribe to an entire different approach ;that of not giving that group a target. But make no mistake a group of Frat boys would try it just to tell the story about tossing out 3 or six football players. I’m hearing racial inciting was the issue then it was huge numbers going on the football players. Just saying a ten to twenty man group of frat boys or 10 to 20 football players would make most gun owners/carriers unholster their sidearm and let it be seen it’s there and that’s controversial even for a civilian. But even if any D1 state university player pulls a gun it will never be condoned. However there is a major issue of proof and proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Illl allow my message board cyber counselor The Hack take over here at this legal hairsplitting. One or two punks saying they seen something is not beyond doubt of any kind. So this case has gotta be worked out , and I’ve seen a dam sight more Frat boys startin $hit in public than I have football players. So I’m hoping we can get some things resolved in a timely manner for everyone’s sake.
Yep. Seems a lot of folks actually bought the Jump to Conclusions Matt.For clarity it was alleged that a gun was brandished but that has been disputed. Best not to speculate for right now.
How is a house rented by fraternity brothers in order to have parties not essentially a frat house? No sign over the door? Not owned by the University? I think a fraternity could hold a party at a Krogers or on the moon and it would look the same.It was not a frat house.
If it was a direct submission, there would be an indictment and a circuit case number. I've not read that they have been indicted by the grand jury. Unless I just missed it. If not the officer filed a criminal complaint and it should be in district court and there will be a prelim hearing.Must have. Otherwise like you said they would've needed a prelim and this story would've been out
If it was a direct submission, there would be an indictment and a circuit case number. I've not read that they have been indicted by the grand jury. Unless I just missed it. If not the officer filed a criminal complaint and it should be in district court and there will be a prelim hearing.
It was a frat party at a private residence.It was a FRAT HOUSE. Do you even try to know what the situation is before you talk?
OK thanks but what I was trying to point out is that these places function every day in a very similar manner, doors open, tons of coming and going, open access, beer, girls, dope, etc. People keep stating, “coming in my home”, like a private single family house but these places are much more public especially during a party. Then they function just like a traditional fraternity house,Difference in the rights of the university oversight, property rights, etc etc. night and day. The students of course must comply with university standards but the university doesn’t see it as the official campus house.
Yeah, I never understood that either. Talk about being needy.I would have joined a fraternity, but didn’t have enough $$$ to buy friends
Yes. I am not in agreement or disagreement, but just saying basically how the university and the frat organizations interact for rules, oversight, insurance purposes etc.OK thanks but what I was trying to point out is that these places function every day in a very similar manner, doors open, tons of coming and going, open access, beer, girls, dope, etc. People keep stating, “coming in my home”, like a private single family house but these places are much more public especially during a party. Then they function just like a traditional fraternity house,
Lol, I can’t tell if this is actually serious.Frats should not be allowed to restrict admission to there parties. FB players should be allowed to go anywhere they want anytime they want.
if they asked them to leave and the whet and got some friends and a gun and came back they need to be gone.It was a FRAT HOUSE. Do you even try to know what the situation is before you talk?
What that tells me is that the Commonwealth Attorney's office really wasn't impressed with the circumstances and evidence after discussing it with the investigators. This would be one of those cases that would be a direct submission to the grand jury.Correct. The early information I saw was they were indicted, but that was wrong. They were only charged and have the prelim coming up
Crawford hates Uk so his stories will tilt in that direction.In reading Crawfords report, this is a very serious matter. Information he published would make me wonder why assault, assault and battery and more serious charges weren't there....once again, if true.
This can rank all the way from pretty bad to what in haven's name bad.
If this were UT players, it would have been the cops that got their @$$es whipped and threatened with a gun AND recorded on police cam resulting in..............wait for it.............If this was at UT, then this board would be a combination of mockery and wanting the kids hung and program disbanded...