yeahAgreed. This is a right, left and middle issue. No need to take sides.
Agreed, but not by force. Which is what you are supporting. The Bible always refers to giving of free will or of good conscience. I struggle to see where the government picking winners and losers fits that mold. I have two in college as I type this and do not support loan forgiveness in any way shape or form.Instead of typing all these, the Bible also speaks about forgiving debts.
![]()
8 Bible verses about Cancelling Debts
A topical Bible which shows the most relevant Bible verse for each topicbible.knowing-jesus.com
And mocking religion in an incredibly misguided way.Must feel a lot of guilt grifting off your fellow Americans while projecting back onto them that it's their fault.
Bad analogy by you.No I wouldn't. The majority of the people upset with this are people that practice Christianity and that Jesus paid our debt for salvation is the foundation of those religious beliefs.
And mocking religion in an incredibly misguided way.
People without kids are forced to pay taxes for public schools. People who don’t drive are forced to pay taxes for roads. People who didn’t get PPP loans were forced to pay for those loans but this is what you have a problem with?Agreed, but not by force. Which is what you are supporting. The Bible always refers to giving of free will or of good conscience. I struggle to see where the government picking winners and losers fits that mold. I have two in college as I type this and do not support loan forgiveness in any way shape or form.
In reality, if given a choice I would be against most of those.People without kids are forced to pay taxes for public schools. People who don’t drive are forced to pay taxes for roads. People who didn’t get PPP loans were forced to pay for those loans but this is what you have a problem with?
That is probably true but the fact is many people are forced to pay taxes for things that they don't use or need. No one complains about those taxes so it is just funny to see much uproar with being "forced" to pay this. I will also point out that nowhere has that actually been proven to be true yet.In reality, if given a choice I would be against most of those.
This. This so many times over. It's just like the affordable housing laws that mandated lowering underwriting standards and led to the Great Recession, but NO ONE is calling attention to it. Same thing, making loans with no consideration for the borrower's ability to repay.What we need to do is get the federal completely out of the business of guaranteeing student loans. If there was no federal guarantee and student loans were dischargeable in bankruptcy, the entire landscape of higher education would change almost overnight. Prices would plummet and entire departments of useless people would be disappear.
Banks hire actuaries and analysts to determine whether someone is a good bet for a loan. Without a federal guarantee that the loan will be repaid and the assurance that the loan can't be bankrupted, would any bank loan someone $100+k to get an undergrad degree in gender studies or whatever? The answer to that is a flat "hell no". But our government policy makes it happen every day... and the notion that this is just the first step to a full forgiveness.
I'd actually be fine with a much larger loan forgiveness program if the federal government simultaneously announced that it is completely winding down the student loan guarantees over the next year... and this was done by a vote of Congress, not an executive order from a president who is, at best, barely sentient.
I'm doubtful that Biden has the authority to do this by executive order -- even Pelosi said a while back that the president does not have the authority to forgive student loans (not that she is an esteemed legal scholar). The problem will be whether this issue can get to the Supreme Court to have it thrown out because finding a plaintiff with standing might be difficult.
Were you anywhere near as vocal about opposing PPP's as you are about opposing student loan debt forgiveness?In reality, if given a choice I would be against most of those.
Were you anywhere near as vocal about opposing PPP's as you are about opposing student loan debt forgiveness?
I don't think your idea will work since the federal government took over almost all new student loans in 2010 under an Obama plan to squeeze out banks as lenders. The government is not going refuse loans to poor (bad risk) people even if it makes good business sense.
I think making the comparison to PPPs and student loan forgiveness is a ridiculous red herring. The government compelled most businesses to shut down -- that's functionally a taking that should require just compensation.Were you anywhere near as vocal about opposing PPP's as you are about opposing student loan debt forgiveness?
I think making the comparison to PPPs and student loan forgiveness is a ridiculous red herring. The government compelled most businesses to shut down -- that's functionally a taking that should require just compensation.
No one compelled anyone to get student debt.
No one compelled people like MTG and Matt Gaetz to get PPP loans who then donated the proceeds to their campaigns.I think making the comparison to PPPs and student loan forgiveness is a ridiculous red herring. The government compelled most businesses to shut down -- that's functionally a taking that should require just compensation.
No one compelled anyone to get student debt.
Doesn't look like she abided by the forgiveness mechanism yet her loan was forgiven.Plus one of the terms of the ppp loans was the forgiveness mechanism.
Trying to equate them is an incredibly disingenuous argument.
Doesn't look like she abided by the forgiveness mechanism yet her loan was forgiven.
![]()
Self-funding QAnon candidate gave own campaign $450,000 after getting PPP loan
Watchdog group, along with Marjorie Taylor Greene's former GOP opponent, call on her to give the money backnews.yahoo.com
I searched MTG PPP campaign donation. Plenty of results came back. That’s the beauty of Google. If you get specific, your results aren’t based on search history since that is the first time I searched for that information.If she committed fraud, then she'll be prosecuted. That's for sure. So if she isn't prosecuted, then she didn't commit fraud and she was entitled to forgiveness.
This isn't difficult at all for anyone that's intellectually honest.
Bonus points for having a search history/algorithm that pushed a Q headline to the top of your search or news results.
Sounds like we’re all in agreement that government handouts and loan forgiveness can be easily abused and manipulated and seems to result in an overall detriment to the majority of working Americans.Doesn't look like she abided by the forgiveness mechanism yet her loan was forgiven.
Yet those griping about a forgiveness program to help the working class didn’t gripe about a forgiveness program that benefitted the financial elite.Sounds like we’re all in agreement that government handouts and loan forgiveness can be easily abused and manipulated and seems to result in an overall detriment to the majority of working Americans.
I searched MTG PPP campaign donation. Plenty of results came back. That’s the beauty of Google. If you get specific, your results aren’t based on search history since that is the first time I searched for that information.
Yet those griping about a forgiveness program to help the working class didn’t gripe about a forgiveness program that benefitted the financial elite.
They weren't in this case since I had never searched for that information. It is also possible to turn off those personalized recommendations.Your Google search results aren't influenced by search history?
Yes please tell me more.
The amount shouldn't mean anything. The argument is you signed for the loan. You should pay it back.10 k for student loans helps the working class as much as PPP loans helped struggling small businesses keep their doors open.
You should pay it back.
The PPP should be paid back. Got it!!!!You finally got something right! Congrats!
The amount shouldn't mean anything. The argument is you signed for the loan. You should pay it back.
Seems like you are inventing a reality and then arguing against it. Plenty of people criticized the so called "forgiveness program that benefited the financial elite". None of what the government has done since the bailouts starting at the end of the Bush administration have been justified or financially prudent. The government handing out money to correct poor financial decisions is a bad idea. Period. People and companies who make poor financial decisions should suffer the consequences of those decisions.Yet those griping about a forgiveness program to help the working class didn’t gripe about a forgiveness program that benefitted the financial elite.
Correct. That’s why I said we’re all in agreement.The amount shouldn't mean anything. The argument is you signed for the loan. You should pay it back.
There wasn't near the backlash about PPP as there is about this.Seems like you are inventing a reality and then arguing against it. Plenty of people criticized the so called "forgiveness program that benefited the financial elite". None of what the government has done since the bailouts starting at the end of the Bush administration have been justified or financially prudent. The government handing out money to correct poor financial decisions is a bad idea. Period. People and companies who make poor financial decisions should suffer the consequences of those decisions.
There wasn't near the backlash about PPP as there is about this.
We just like to point out people like yours hypocrisy.Yep, no one was infuriated the government was shuttering businesses as a response to the pandemic.
In fact, I remember how many business owners were elated to find out they were no longer going to be able to make a living!
Can anyone in favor of student loan forgiveness put forth an actual argument without all the nonsense of whataboutisms or invoking entirely unrelated matters into the debate? Anyone?
Good f’n shit right here! Respect to your parents!We moved from a 3rd word country when I was 5, but my sister was 14 and my brother 11. Anyway we ended up in West Virginia and my sister graduated as salutatorian but we all despised WV and my sister wanted to live in the big city and got accepted to NYU and wanted to be a French major with a minor in music. At the time (1993) NYU was like 40k a year just for tuition and my sister would have a full ride to WVU which my parents forced her to apply to. My parents basically told my sister to f*ck off she was going to WVU and majoring in the sciences and they would have the most massive fights and arguments over it until my parents finally said fine. So the day my sister thought she was going to NYU my parents dropped her off at WVU on the way and left.
It really is a crazy story and my sister always told it with anger and regret until she was about 25. She’s now high up in the NIH living in DC and now when she tells the story we laugh about what a dipshit she was and how she would’ve ruined her life being a French major in 300k debt in NYC.
Moral of the story: parents need to grow a bigger sack and actually wisely advise their kids and be assholes sometimes.
Yep, no one was infuriated the government was shuttering businesses as a response to the pandemic.
In fact, I remember how many business owners were elated to find out they were no longer going to be able to make a living!
Can anyone in favor of student loan forgiveness put forth an actual argument without all the nonsense of whataboutisms or invoking entirely unrelated matters into the debate? Anyone?
Yes, easily.
The entire student loan process is criminal. You're targeting the most uneducated, vulnerable, unsophisticated borrowers possible, and ruining their lives by allowing literal *children* to borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars of unbankruptable debt that can survive their death and/or their disability. The underwriting process requires no income verification, no assets, no job history, no credit check, no parental support, and doesn't take into account future earnings, future potential, field of study, or whether the recipient will even graduate or not. It's destroying the lives and the futures of the graduating students who are supposed to be the future of the country. An entire generation is buried in this shit and won't have the ability to start businesses, buy cars, homes, etc. It's an enormous drag on our economy.
If this program were targeting the elderly, or those with disabilities, you'd have thousands of people put in jail over this scam. Instead, it's become a criminally predatory, $2 trillion scam to line the pockets of schools and their administrations at the expense of children.
So yeah, I'm in favor of cutting some slack to the borrowers who were preyed upon by their government and by their respective schools. My biggest problem with the news this week, though, is that it doesn't go far enough. Most of this debt was fake, and would never be repaid anyways. So if you ask me, you should eliminate even more of it, but MOST IMPORTANTLY, you scrap this entire, ridiculous, insanely predatory scam and start over from scratch.