one thing for sure charles is a much better athlete than DeAndre
DeAndre has made it in the pros... You don't get there without having great athletic ability. Let's be the judge as the season goes along.
one thing for sure charles is a much better athlete than DeAndre
. nope judging now and Matthew is the better athlete and there are all kinds of unathletic guys playing pro ball,get realDeAndre has made it in the pros... You don't get there without having great athletic ability. Let's be the judge as the season goes along.
Brisco will start and be the best player on the floor.
I think people who say those who say 40-0 are automatically trolls and should be banned are trolls, if I was a mod the above poster would be banned on that alone.
See how that works?
Thankful you are not a mod btw.
guys by now all true UK fans have learned their lesson about 40-0. Only trolls suggest it now to the point if I was a mod the above poster would be banned on that alone.
When has the freshman ever not been the better option? You are suggesting there was at least one instance when Cal intentionally didn't play the better player because he feels the need to get people drafted, when I'm very certain that has never happened. He's never had to really choose, since the highly rated guys are always our best players, but still.
When will you be convinced you've told everyone your three points?Booker and Ulis have been argued by many to have been the better option over the Harrisons, but they did not play in the end against Wiscy.
Booker and Ulis have been argued by many to have been the better option over the Harrisons, but they did not play in the end against Wiscy.
This might win post of the year40-0 is looking like a real possibility this year since Ulis, Murray, Briscoe, Mulder, and Matthews are all going to start, in addition to Skal and Poythress.
You and other random people disagreeing with who should have been playing is not proof that Cal is intentionally subverting team success to get people drafted. Especially since they were clearly being outplayed in that game.Booker and Ulis have been argued by many to have been the better option over the Harrisons, but they did not play in the end against Wiscy.
Could be almost as sticky as the 2-3-3 dook has run for years...Can't wait to see our new 2-2-3 defense..
I see what you did there Mus.Even if we were allowed to play with seven starters. It still would be seven versus Eight.
Better Shooter...
![]()
How many people missed the joke in that post? This might be a fishing record.
SMH, stop it. 40-0 is never going to happen for any team in college basketball.
Its who finishes that matters, especially in close games.
Guys who can defend will be in there:
Poy
Ulis
Murray
Skal
Hawkins
Sound crazy? I think Hawkins tries to break through this year and that's not a knock on Briscoe.
Booker and Ulis have been argued by many to have been the better option over the Harrisons, but they did not play in the end against Wiscy.
Cal might opt for Briscoe in the end, but that doesn't mean he's going to be a better finisher for us this season than Hawkins. That kid's chance to shine is now.Briscoe is a player, just watch and wait.
Cal might opt for Briscoe in the end, but that doesn't mean he's going to be a better finisher for us this season than Hawkins. That kid's chance to shine is now.
Cal might opt for Briscoe in the end, but that doesn't mean he's going to be a better finisher for us this season than Hawkins. That kid's chance to shine is now.
Cal might opt for Briscoe in the end, but that doesn't mean he's going to be a better finisher for us this season than Hawkins. That kid's chance to shine is now.
You serious Clark?
Note: To everyone else, is this a joke? I am off my game lately, but I think this guy actually thinks Hawkins>Briscoe. If Briscoe can shoot over 28% from 2, 18% from 3, and 40% from the FT line I think he will rise above Hawkins...no offense KMKat.[/QUOTE
Well, Cal's trend is to play the freshmen over any returnee. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm looking at it as the best 5 at the end of games. Of course it depends on the lead, the situation, but I felt Hawkins deserved more time last year, but you can't play everyone. I get it.
If this is a prediction game, I lose every time; Cal will play the freshmen.
Cal might opt for Briscoe in the end, but that doesn't mean he's going to be a better finisher for us this season than Hawkins. That kid's chance to shine is now.
40-0 is looking like a real possibility this year since Ulis, Murray, Briscoe, Mulder, and Matthews are all going to start, in addition to Skal and Poythress.
Maybe on the Raftards. You should see the like circlejerks on the Paddock, though. N***as don't fool around with likes there.20 likes? Is that a Rupp Rafters' record?
20 likes? Is that a Rupp Rafters' record?
Maybe on the Raftards. You should see the like circlejerks on the Paddock, though. N***as don't fool around with likes there.