I agree.
I had a few folks at my last job who couldn't handle the independence, would disappear for hours on end, their work slacked off and they were disciplined. I'm a quiet person by nature and the dead silece of my home office is a much better environment for me than being in an office with a constant murmur of voices and those random collegaues who drop by your desk/cubicle/office to BS about nothing at inoportune times.
It does seem like some companies have embraced it and others are clinging to in-office for dear life, likely in part due to expensive leases. I have a cousin who is a senior hiring manager at a pretty big company in central Kentucky that is fully in-person with a lot of jobs that just need the internet to do them. Their competitors offer full-time remote for those same positions. He says recently they've had a lot of trouble filling openings because their talent pool is required to live within 50 miles of HQ, while their competitors can recruit and hire nationally.
I still view WFH as a positive for workers and allows them to have more flexibility at their jobs/control over their personal lives without feeling like some corporation them. For example, if I had a doctor's appointment or some kind of personal/home emergency in the morning that took 3 hours, I can a) take a half day of PTO b) work 3 hours later that night c) split those 3 hours up and work an hour late/early over 3 days, etc., etc. That's better than being required to be in a certain place for at the same 8 (or more) hours a day for 5 days.