ADVERTISEMENT

Return to Office

Big professional services firms (law, accounting) have been reducing leased office space for years because the days of needing large offices in which to meet clients was going away even before the pandemic. But now that is especially true, and these firms have used remote work as a way to save money because real estate leasing is the largest overhead spend in these types of firms. Even with these reductions, the offices might be largely empty on certain days of the week. These firms don't want to push a RTW strategy for fear of losing talent to competitors. I think this will remain the case unless and until we have an economic downturn that causes people to fear for their jobs.

As for the OP, the federal government is in the same position as these private firms. It needs to either reduce the office space spend, or require workers to come into the office.
Would take rezoning everywhere, I would assume, but converting corporate leased buildings into affordable residential space would do America a lot more good than forcing people to go work in an office if they don't need to.
 
Big professional services firms (law, accounting) have been reducing leased office space for years because the days of needing large offices in which to meet clients was going away even before the pandemic. But now that is especially true, and these firms have used remote work as a way to save money because real estate leasing is the largest overhead spend in these types of firms. Even with these reductions, the offices might be largely empty on certain days of the week. These firms don't want to push a RTW strategy for fear of losing talent to competitors. I think this will remain the case unless and until we have an economic downturn that causes people to fear for their jobs.

As for the OP, the federal government is in the same position as these private firms. It needs to either reduce the office space spend, or require workers to come into the office.

Before/after pandemic office numbers aren't close to comparable. Many firms are pushing for a RTW strategy or at least, a hybrid model vs. full remote, especially in larger corporate environments....NYC, LA, Boston, etc. Companies that are true to their obligations as a productive member of society, especially. This doesn't just affect them....it has a massive financial impact on others when companies shy away from RTW responsibilities.
 
Would take rezoning everywhere, I would assume, but converting corporate leased buildings into affordable residential space would do America a lot more good than forcing people to go work in an office if they don't need to.
Already being tried all around the country, but has proven to be very difficult to convert office space into living space for all kinds of reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmericanDragon
As usual, the right answer is down the middle. Not everything Daddy Elon says is right. The answer depends on the job, the employee, etc. We’ve been mostly WFH since COVID, and recently more of a hybrid with most days WFH and in the office as needed. Since COVID, we’ve been way more productive than before. Personally, I’ve hyper-productive at home. A lot of my time in my job is spent in meetings (like I bet most of all of yours is too). Before WFH, you sat in meetings and didn’t get much done. Now I can listen to the meeting but also knock out email, update charts, answer my employees questions on TEAMS chats, etc. You can get way more done at home with limited interruptions. No more having to listen to everyone’s stories of how the weekend went, what their kids are up to, or hear them complain about their boss.

As far as some people abusing it, no doubt they do. But those same people abused time in the office too by taking longer breaks, walking around talking to people, etc. I’m a supervisor, I have one guy I have to nudge more than others. The rest are awesome and I keep up with them to make sure they’re good. I have one remote worker who obviously never comes in. Best employee on my team.

Current routine is to get up and ready, log on within 15 minutes of getting ready and start my day. Previous routine also added a longish commute to get there, plus the constant distractions while I’m there, plus having to leave by a certain time to get the kids. None of that applies now. So again, how is WFH less productive besides Elon saying it is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix
It’s been headed this way for a long time and only makes sense. At some employers will ask “why is it my job to keep you motivated”? Either you’ll want the money and meet the requirements or you won’t.
 
It’s been headed this way for a long time and only makes sense. At some employers will ask “why is it my job to keep you motivated”? Either you’ll want the money and meet the requirements or you won’t.
Bingo, not that hard of a concept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix
I have been remote since March 2020. I quit my last job when we were forced to return to the office in late 2021. Just said F it, I’m out. Why? I needed a laptop and the internet to do the work. I lived 60 miles from the office and spent no less than 10 hours of my own time driving to and from work each week. I put 30K in mileage on my car in a year just commuting. I had to leave at the crack of dawn, wouldn’t get home until almost dark and would have about 4 hours of free time before I went to bed. Got old quickly.

Now, I roll out of bed, piss, brush teeth, make coffee and login. My commute is 5 minutes. When the day is over, I close the computer and am already home. My evening free time is now closer to 8 hours because I can stay up later and sleep later.

I come to work to work, not socialize. I am twice as productive from my quiet house as I am in a loud office.

As for the government, it doesn’t shock me they over leased space and now want to force warm bodies to fill chairs so they get a proper ROI.

I also think extroverts who can’t exist without human interaction prefer office work, where introverts such as myself prefer to be left TF alone to do our thing. I’m grown. I’ll get it done. Don’t worry, boss man. I also think it’s an age thing. From my experiences, 40s and under prefer working remote. 50+ prefers working in office because it’s how they were conditioned to work.
 
But what about costs associated with work from home? It’s not free for companies to have people work from home. Allowances for laptops, making sure network connections are stable and the costs associated etc etc

My company provided me with a laptop and we get new ones every 3-5 years on a rolling scale by last name. I am responsible for providing internet service that meets certain speed requirements. I bought my own second monitor, wireless mouse and keyboard. So, they’re out $400 on a laptop for each WFH employee. But, those same employees receive that same laptop if they work in office, so that expense is already included.

My company also sold off its giant HQ, downsized into a much smaller building it already owns, and granted anyone who wanted it permanent WFH status. We saved several million dollars and apparently avoided a round of layoffs with the money saved selling that big, mostly empty office building.
 
Already being tried all around the country, but has proven to be very difficult to convert office space into living space for all kinds of reasons.

Because so many cities were allowed to devolve into crime riddled cesspools thick with bums. Thats why people couldn't wait to leave downtowns when the clock hit their hour, often to find their car was broken into while they were working. All while paying through the nose for parking

Every mayor begging companies to come back stuck their head in the sand while these companies advised of their employees complaints.

Turns out if you make downtown a place where fun can thrive, you don't have to beg people to be there.
 
Because so many cities were allowed to devolve into crime riddled cesspools thick with bums. Thats why people couldn't wait to leave downtowns when the clock hit their hour, often to find their car was broken into while they were working. All while paying through the nose for parking

Every mayor begging companies to come back stuck their head in the sand while these companies advised of their employees complaints.

Turns out if you make downtown a place where fun can thrive, you don't have to beg people to be there.
Sorry, but that is not my point at all. It is very difficult from a construction standpoint to convert a commercial office building into apartments with the type of amenities people expect like soundproof walls, multiple bathrooms in every unit, windows in every room etc. There are construction professionals who post on here who can explain in more detail than I, but it is much more difficult than simply putting a few dry walls up and calling an office building an apartment or a condominium. It can be done, but it is by no means cheap affordable housing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1
Though I cannot blame them, the people who love WFH are able to get in their daily household stuff around the work. When quitting time comes, likely have a whole bunch of free time they never had when dragging in from the office. That’s a great incentive.

It’s absolutely beautiful, my friend.

I use my lunch to knockout some dishes or laundry or to run quick errands and eat a sandwich at my desk if there’s not enough time to eat. Most days, my evenings are pure leisure time as compared to coming home pissed off daily from driving 60 miles one way and fighting major metro area traffic at 8 a.m and 5 p.m.

It’s worked wonders for my level of stress and general happiness.
 
I work from home every day and if I was in the office I’d still spend my day on video calls with people around the world. Having said that, I actually prefer to have a local office. I kind of miss the camaraderie. I disagree it hurts productivity, but it can lead to a more isolating culture.
 
There is the problem of cities losing out on office space tax revenue.. and that's going to pile up. We still have leases on office spaces that aren't up yet from covid. Some are 3 years some are 5 and some are more.

Not sure what the answer is here. I totally understand the thought process behind pushing RTO.. we need the tax revenue and we also need the secondary economies around office areas (your coffee shops, restaurants, convenient stores, etc). Not only are office vacancies slamming cities like NY, but a lot of the local businesses are struggling too. Lost tax revenue means program funding/infrastructure/city improvements dwindle, then lost jobs. Local businesses that rely on offices being staffed also lose jobs (but I guess suburb businesses all get a boost from WFH so idk).

It really seems so much of what society is built on, comes from people commuting to jobs and working in an office. So i get the concern of where we are heading.
 
Sorry, but that is not my point at all. It is very difficult from a construction standpoint to convert a commercial office building into apartments with the type of amenities people expect like soundproof walls, multiple bathrooms in every unit, windows in every room etc. There are construction professionals who post on here who can explain in more detail than I, but it is much more difficult than simply putting a few dry walls up and calling an office building an apartment or a condominium. It can be done, but it is by no means cheap affordable housing.

I know it wasnt but it should be. In many cities, living downtown is desirable and maintains downtown hospitality on their own. Commuters are gravy.

The other cities, the ones i described, are the ones having problems. Noone wants to downtown for any reason, so there is no interest in living downtown. Without that market, noone is going to build or convert anything nor should they.

These mayors created their own mess. Now theyre trying to strong arm companies into interjecting their mandates to overcome the market and social forces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LineSkiCat14
My solution: There's probably going to have to be some sort of compromise. Workers just arent gonna go back into an office 5 days a week and I think its unfair to ask them to. If a company does this, that company is either going to 1. have to pay more in salary or 2. live with the fact that good talent will go to the companies that DO offer WFH.

So create a policy where staff comes in 2-3 days a week, and utilize shared desks and hotel-ing space for those workers. Not everyone needs a desk especially if half the staff isn't even there. That way companies can shrink office space to save some money as they will only ever be at 60% capacity.. state and local governments will still get better tax revenue than they are now.. and workers still get a huge benefit of WFH a few days a week.
 
I know it wasnt but it should be. In many cities, living downtown is desirable and maintains downtown hospitality on their own. Commuters are gravy.

The other cities, the ones i described, are the ones having problems. Noone wants to downtown for any reason, so there is no interest in living downtown. Without that market, noone is going to build or convert anything nor should they.

These mayors created their own mess. Now theyre trying to strong arm companies into interjecting their mandates to overcome the market and social forces.

Downtown Albany is an absolute mess. Less percentage of workers in the various "highrise" buildings have caused many ancillary businesses to go belly up. Crime is through the roof. And no one wants to go near downtown Albany. What once was the happening place to be and vibrant is now kind of a ghost town.

Now, part of that is a shit stain mayor. And there are neighboring cities that seem to have adjusted just fine.. but Albany is home to the state workers and that's a HUGE pool of workers. Albany was where people went to work. Once lots of them went remote, Albany hit a real rough patch and it might be a long time before it comes back.
 
Downtown Albany is an absolute mess. Less percentage of workers in the various "highrise" buildings have caused many ancillary businesses to go belly up. Crime is through the roof. And no one wants to go near downtown Albany. What once was the happening place to be and vibrant is now kind of a ghost town.

Now, part of that is a shit stain mayor. And there are neighboring cities that seem to have adjusted just fine.. but Albany is home to the state workers and that's a HUGE pool of workers. Albany was where people went to work. Once lots of them went remote, Albany hit a real rough patch and it might be a long time before it comes back.
Downtown Washington, DC has had a noticeable downturn since the pandemic ended too. Far fewer feds coming into the office, and those that do, usually only do so a few days each week. It's not as bad as Albany sounds, but there are a few areas that had become much nicer and developed (e.g., the Chinatown/Gallery Place area) where now every 2nd or 3rd storefront is empty. That area was a complete shitpile when I did my undergrad in DC in the mid-90s, but starting in the early 2000s, it really improved. Now that's being reversed.

Like in Albany, you also have stupid local government with an incompetent mayor, and of course it's an unaccountable, one-party system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LineSkiCat14
Before/after pandemic office numbers aren't close to comparable. Many firms are pushing for a RTW strategy or at least, a hybrid model vs. full remote, especially in larger corporate environments....NYC, LA, Boston, etc. Companies that are true to their obligations as a productive member of society, especially. This doesn't just affect them....it has a massive financial impact on others when companies shy away from RTW responsibilities.
Animated GIF
 
It’s absolutely beautiful, my friend.

I use my lunch to knockout some dishes or laundry or to run quick errands and eat a sandwich at my desk if there’s not enough time to eat. Most days, my evenings are pure leisure time as compared to coming home pissed off daily from driving 60 miles one way and fighting major metro area traffic at 8 a.m and 5 p.m.

It’s worked wonders for my level of stress and general happiness.
This. This right here. It saves SO much time and employees are generally happier. Now, tbf, WFH is not for everyone and some people absolutely abuse the crap out of it. But for those that can, I see no issue. If 90% of your work is done sitting at a computer, why on Earth does it matter where you do that work at? When I was able to WFH, I got so much more done work and home wise. It's gonna be the way of the future for some jobs, obviously not all.

The time you know it's about control is when some of those jobs get sent overseas. Like, oh, so in office only matters for US workers. Gotcha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaBlue05
There is the problem of cities losing out on office space tax revenue.. and that's going to pile up. We still have leases on office spaces that aren't up yet from covid. Some are 3 years some are 5 and some are more.

Not sure what the answer is here. I totally understand the thought process behind pushing RTO.. we need the tax revenue and we also need the secondary economies around office areas (your coffee shops, restaurants, convenient stores, etc). Not only are office vacancies slamming cities like NY, but a lot of the local businesses are struggling too. Lost tax revenue means program funding/infrastructure/city improvements dwindle, then lost jobs. Local businesses that rely on offices being staffed also lose jobs (but I guess suburb businesses all get a boost from WFH so idk).

It really seems so much of what society is built on, comes from people commuting to jobs and working in an office. So i get the concern of where we are heading.
The problem lies in the cost of that commuting. Gas prices keep going up. Car prices keep going up. Car repair costs keep going up. At some point you are getting paid to only cover the costs of your commute. It's like a bad joke. I don't like a lot of it either. And companies really should be open to hybrid models. No one wants to commute 60-90 minutes 5 days a week. Especially without public transport. As some one who had a 1 hour commute each way, it got old.....quick. The other issue becomes housing and rent has made it a lot harder for commuters to think about moving. That's a huge commitment to a job that may get rid of you on a whim as well (see the huge layoffs this past year).

I don't know man. A lot of it is broken and there's no easy answers. But we've got to figure something out.
 
I work 100% remote and will never go back in office. I might do a 1 day a week hybrid if I can't find anymore remote jobs but that's it. I work in finance and payroll and accounting. Covid proved working n the office was a waste of time.
Payroll gets done at home, accounting gets done and so on.

I get recruiters all the time wanting me to drive to downtown Nashville, TN and deal with road rage and losing 8 hours of family time a week to sit n crap traffic. No thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaBlue05
This. This right here. It saves SO much time and employees are generally happier. Now, tbf, WFH is not for everyone and some people absolutely abuse the crap out of it. But for those that can, I see no issue. If 90% of your work is done sitting at a computer, why on Earth does it matter where you do that work at? When I was able to WFH, I got so much more done work and home wise. It's gonna be the way of the future for some jobs, obviously not all.

The time you know it's about control is when some of those jobs get sent overseas. Like, oh, so in office only matters for US workers. Gotcha.

I agree.

I had a few folks at my last job who couldn't handle the independence, would disappear for hours on end, their work slacked off and they were disciplined. I'm a quiet person by nature and the dead silece of my home office is a much better environment for me than being in an office with a constant murmur of voices and those random collegaues who drop by your desk/cubicle/office to BS about nothing at inoportune times.

It does seem like some companies have embraced it and others are clinging to in-office for dear life, likely in part due to expensive leases. I have a cousin who is a senior hiring manager at a pretty big company in central Kentucky that is fully in-person with a lot of jobs that just need the internet to do them. Their competitors offer full-time remote for those same positions. He says recently they've had a lot of trouble filling openings because their talent pool is required to live within 50 miles of HQ, while their competitors can recruit and hire nationally.

I still view WFH as a positive for workers and allows them to have more flexibility at their jobs/control over their personal lives without feeling like some corporation them. For example, if I had a doctor's appointment or some kind of personal/home emergency in the morning that took 3 hours, I can a) take a half day of PTO b) work 3 hours later that night c) split those 3 hours up and work an hour late/early over 3 days, etc., etc. That's better than being required to be in a certain place for at the same 8 (or more) hours a day for 5 days.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT