awfulWell UK holds all the cards. Let him bust his butt in his classes but give him failing grades. Either he plays here or he doesn’t play anywhere else next season!
awfulWell UK holds all the cards. Let him bust his butt in his classes but give him failing grades. Either he plays here or he doesn’t play anywhere else next season!
This is a ridiculously dumb post. Reeves scored 37 points, on the road, at Arkansas. He took over the game and couldn’t be stopped.There is no way in hell that Reeves is going to play 25 to 28 minutes a game if he stays at UK. He is a terrible defensive player. He does not handle the ball that well. He is a very inconsistent shooter. He might not get 20 minutes a game if he comes back.
I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but I want to point out that 37 points in the game you mentioned, then 5 points on 1-15 shooting in another game pretty much fits the definition of inconsistent, IMHO.Everyone is inconsistent shooting to some of you.... But he's one of only 2 people to put up 37 on the road in the sec in the modern era for us. So there's that
I said that he is a very inconsistent shooter. He shot UK out of some games. You, of course, ignored his abysmal 1-15 performance against Kansas State in the tournament. You also ignored my points about Reeves poor defense and his struggles handling the ball. I didn't say he sucks. My main point is if he comes back to UK, he will have a lesser role. He won't have as much freedom to shoot the ball as much as he did last year.This is a ridiculously dumb post. Reeves scored 37 points, on the road, at Arkansas. He took over the game and couldn’t be stopped.
How many guys in the history of UK basketball have done that? Like, 2? Again, it happened on the road in one of the toughest atmospheres to win in, but you think he sucks??? That’s next level idiocy there.
He literally shot UK into the second round. Or did you forget that? He’s by far our best 3 point shooter. I’d put him top 10 best 3 point shooters in the Cal era. Everyone has a bad shooting game. Literally every great shooter.He will never live down 1 for 15 and 1 for 10 from three v K-St.
He literally shot UK out of the S16 .
I like how you are assuming Dillingham and Wagner will never struggle or have bad games.By the way neither is known as a good outside shooter.I said that he is a very inconsistent shooter. He shot UK out of some games. You, of course, ignored his abysmal 1-15 performance against Kansas State in the tournament. You also ignored my points about Reeves poor defense and his struggles handling the ball. I didn't say he sucks. My main point is if he comes back to UK, he will have a lesser role. He won't have as much freedom to shoot the ball as much as he did last year.
He's like UK media's Kamala Harris. Takes an hour to say the same thing and often doesn't know WTF he's talking about.I hope Pilgrim is successful because I enjoy podcasts about UK basketball and he’s willing to put in the time to do it. But he is a tough listen. It takes Pilgrim a really long time to convey a point. He starts and stammers a lot. Generally seems to restate every point at least 3 times using one or two different words but saying the exact same thing. Hedges almost every statement, e.g., “every single time… well most times… or usually when”
He asks a question. Then, before he will let the person respond, he goes through all the possible answers (in his mind) – plus he repeats those possible answers in two or three different ways - and then he argues for the answer he would give. By the time he finishes the “question” – if you could call it that – the listener has forgotten what the original question was.
But I expect he will get better/smoother with time.
It's looking once again like he would once again be our only capable outside shooter but you would be fine with him leaving.You know NOTHING about basketball.I said that he is a very inconsistent shooter. He shot UK out of some games. You, of course, ignored his abysmal 1-15 performance against Kansas State in the tournament. You also ignored my points about Reeves poor defense and his struggles handling the ball. I didn't say he sucks. My main point is if he comes back to UK, he will have a lesser role. He won't have as much freedom to shoot the ball as much as he did last year.
We haven't seen them play at the college level yet. If they struggled in high school that doesn't mean their shooting cannot improve in college. The team definitely would benefit if Reeves returns. He will have a smaller role if he returns. Why some people on this board refuse to accept that fact is something I don't understand.I like how you are assuming Dillingham and Wagner will never struggle or have bad games.By the way neither is known as a good outside shooter.
Struggled in high school making outside shots but will be much better against tougher competition in one year?You can't make this shit up.We haven't seen them play at the college level yet. If they struggled in high school that doesn't mean their shooting cannot improve in college. The team definitely would benefit if Reeves returns. He will have a smaller role if he returns. Why some people on this board refuse to accept that fact is something I don't understand.
This is typical of the Cal haters. When you point out an obvious fact, they get emotional and overreact. They also distort your points. I never said that I want Reeves to leave the team. I would be pleased if he returns but he will have to accept a lesser role.It's looking once again like he would once again be our only capable outside shooter but you would be fine with him leaving.You know NOTHING about basketball.
You want the freshmen to fail because you hate the coach. Why are you so sure these freshmen will be poor shooters? I think Wagner won the 3 point shooting contest when he played in the Iverson game. You have no idea how these players are going to play this year. It's way too early to be predicting that these freshmen are going to fail.Struggled in high school making outside shots but will be much better against tougher competition in one year?You can't make this shit up.
Reeves had 8 games out of 34 where he shot less than 25% from 3 point land. 3 of those games were a stretch straddling the turn of the New Year where he only played 15 mins per game.This is typical of the Cal haters. When you point out an obvious fact, they get emotional and overreact. They also distort your points. I never said that I want Reeves to leave the team. I would be pleased if he returns but he will have to accept a lesser role.
We have 3 very talented freshmen guards who will be playing for Kentucky this year. Reeves will not be playing as much as he did last year. That's a simple fact unless his shooting becomes much more consistent which is unlikely. That is the only point I am making. I do know enough about basketball to know a very inconsistent shooter when I see one.
It begs, neigh, demands the question: What in the name of unholy hell is going on up there?Now we've reached the point where players are willing to take extra school work to get away from Kentucky, even when they're promised 25 to 30 minutes a game. Good times in Lexington.
Because he wanted to 'get his', and we didn't have a coach with enough sense to say "we might lose, but we're not going to lose via one person who can't throw it in the ocean". Lazy defense, afraid of contact, and dribbled down his leg when it really mattered. And he's STILL trying to get into the league? I'd be embarassed not coming back to make things right.Ever time i think of Reeves it is one miss after another in that last game and he just kept firing away
100% wrong. Thx for playingThere is no way in hell that Reeves is going to play 25 to 28 minutes a game if he stays at UK. He is a terrible defensive player. He does not handle the ball that well. He is a very inconsistent shooter. He might not get 20 minutes a game if he comes back.
You know what I find interesting?
A bit on a rearview mirror take but if you kind of knew/thought Reeves would be back and Toppin would be gone, why not give Reeves the AT&T exposure? He was better than JT last year.
If he got that commercial, highly doubt this is an issue.
I imagine that was at&t decision, not UK.
Come on, man.
Well...Cal isn't exactly doing that.Some of y’all don’t know ball. Reaves is not inconsistent as a shooter I’ve ruling stretches of time. Any 3pt shooter has cold nights. Hell Steph curry has games where he’ll shoot 2-13. It’s on cal to have other options if he’s cold
That’s not on the player tho. That’s on the coach. Acting like reaves isn’t that good is ridiculousWell...Cal isn't exactly doing that.
Yeah, like Murray v Indiana and Herro v Auburn and on and on….He literally shot UK into the second round. Or did you forget that? He’s by far our best 3 point shooter. I’d put him top 10 best 3 point shooters in the Cal era. Everyone has a bad shooting game. Literally every great shooter.
Um noCigar minutes my ass. We have 3 freshmen guards and only 2 of them are gonna play big minutes. Reeves would get 25 to 28 minutes next season.
Gotta love NIL, “those poor miserable, mistreated kids”Now we've reached the point where players are willing to take extra school work to get away from Kentucky, even when they're promised 25 to 30 minutes a game. Good times in Lexington.
1-15 fits an anomaly description. Reeves was our best player for the majority of sec play. If it hadn't been for him We would have had no offenseI don’t really have a dog in this fight, but I want to point out that 37 points in the game you mentioned, then 5 points on 1-15 shooting in another game pretty much fits the definition of inconsistent, IMHO.
😂. Uhhhh unless you win the national championship, almost every great shooter from every team has a bad shooting performance that a lot of the time gets them bounced. So you must be saying that Jamal Murray wasn’t good enough for us. And same with anyone else that didn’t win a national title .Yeah, like Murray v Indiana and Herro v Auburn and on and on….
People remember the choke jobs that get us bounced out of the Dance.
All the FTs Muhammed missed v Zona and all the ones PJ missed v K St.
This is Kentucky; horrible shooting performances that get the Cats booted dont sit well with this one and shouldnt with you either!
PS How bought my Reds sweeping Chicago w/ 23 yr old rookie McClain going 4 for 5 and now batting .380? Reds just 3 back of SF for 3rd NL WC and just 4 back of Milwaukee in the NL Central and that at just 24-29.
This team has had 70 hits in its last 5 games while going 4-1.
Time people took these guys seriously or get rolled….
So you’re saying that every basketball player to ever play is inconsistent… ok then. I guess you’re rightI don’t really have a dog in this fight, but I want to point out that 37 points in the game you mentioned, then 5 points on 1-15 shooting in another game pretty much fits the definition of inconsistent, IMHO.
😂. Uhhhh unless you win the national championship, almost every great shooter from every team has a bad shooting performance that a lot of the time gets them bounced. So you must be saying that Jamal Murray wasn’t good enough for us. And same with anyone else that didn’t win a national title .
This statement just proves how little cal prioritizes shooting.He literally shot UK into the second round. Or did you forget that? He’s by far our best 3 point shooter. I’d put him top 10 best 3 point shooters in the Cal era. Everyone has a bad shooting game. Literally every great shooter.
That is a much better argument for consistency.1-15 fits an anomaly description. Reeves was our best player for the majority of sec play. If it hadn't been for him We would have had no offense
Jan 7 against Alabama is when he started getting major mins. The last 20 games he scored in double figs in 17 of those. 10 being over 18 points. The dude was a player for us
You just changed what you said. You didn't say he was inconsistent, you said he couldn't dribble, or defend and there was no way he was getting 28 mpg in 23/24. Now look atcha, you're doing what you always do, which is try to convince everyone that you said something different, when you know what you actually said is still shown in the thread.I said that he is a very inconsistent shooter. He shot UK out of some games. You, of course, ignored his abysmal 1-15 performance against Kansas State in the tournament. You also ignored my points about Reeves poor defense and his struggles handling the ball. I didn't say he sucks. My main point is if he comes back to UK, he will have a lesser role. He won't have as much freedom to shoot the ball as much as he did last year.
See, you're assuming all these freshmen are going to live up to expectations. At what point are you going to stop falling for the hype?We haven't seen them play at the college level yet. If they struggled in high school that doesn't mean their shooting cannot improve in college. The team definitely would benefit if Reeves returns. He will have a smaller role if he returns. Why some people on this board refuse to accept that fact is something I don't understand.
LOL, Isaiah Briscoe won the 3pt shooting contest too. How did that translate to his time at UK?You want the freshmen to fail because you hate the coach. Why are you so sure these freshmen will be poor shooters? I think Wagner won the 3 point shooting contest when he played in the Iverson game. You have no idea how these players are going to play this year. It's way too early to be predicting that these freshmen are going to fail.
Hell we probably arent even a tournament team at all without him. Yes he stunk in the game against Kansas State but he is a guy capable of making 3 to 5 threes a game sometimes. You have to have someone like that on your team in today's age.He was awful but there is no sweet 16 if not for him
2019 great team. Lost in overtime in the E8 game. ‘20 great team. Win the SEC by 3 games. Didn’t get to show what they could do.Everything since 2015 has been a failed experiment
You are wasting your time on that time. Ignore him.Struggled in high school making outside shots but will be much better against tougher competition in one year?You can't make this shit up.