This has been and always will be the case.
It's something the fanbase has to accept from the standpoint of "well recruiting...if we just get xyz players, and crack the top whatever..."
Folks, we can crack the top 15, and 6-8 of the 14 schools ranked higher we have to play regularly.
It's why I've always argued we need to recruit different areas. We have maxed out with the Ohio talent.
We need to recruit more Texas, California, Florida. Not that we'll get more 4- and 5-star guys. We won't, but a top 20ish class with talent from those states will actually get better results.
Essentially, a Texas, Cali, or Florida 3 star is an Ohio and Kentucky 4 star probably even 5 stars in some cases.
Thanks CMS and Marrow. Good job on making some recruiting headway in Ohio and Kentucky. That took from what .500ish/5-6 wins a year if you average out Brooks n Joker era(s) to about 7 wins a year under.
So it's been worth a game maybe two...primarily Missouri and SC.
If we want to take that next step, the type/class of athlete/talent has to change. Not the star or class ranking.
Just like conferences, and rankings within them. UL was the second-best team in the ACC...we beat em, and honestly, I'd like our chances against FSU.
We got the top such and such in Ohio, okay great, what would he be in east Texas. Broward or Dade County Florida?