So I wonder who the Dems will start propping up for 2028. Vance will almost certainly be the Rep candidate unless something out of blue happens over the next 4 years.
It’s interesting…Vivek definitely brings a flair/say whatever attitude that a lot of Trump’s base relates to…but I don’t think he brings over moderates.What about Vance-Vivek, Tommy?
He should do a zoom meeting from Mar-A-Lago.I feel this is a mistake. I wouldn’t trust anything with Dems.
Especially now. After this Trump landslide. Dems will take a turn to the right much like before Clinton.Newsome can’t win the primary.
Pubs have 213 for a pickup of +1 & are ahead in 11 more - as are Dims.Well, yeah. But 223 would be everything ending up going well for the GOP. Could stay the same or be less. Wish these straggling states could count their damn votes more quickly.
Well...most women.
Can they win the battle with their left wing? In reality, the left wing is not the wing anymore- they’re the bulk of the party.Especially now. After this Trump landslide. Dems will take a turn to the right much like before Clinton.
Sworn in Pakaman. Your feminizing men those days are over.
The census needs to be fixed too based on population growth/ changes. The electoral votes are to change in some states to give R's a 12 vote swingAnd I think NJ could very well be in play in four years. Don’t see NY or CT that soon. Maybe NH flips back with the right candidate…Ayotte, the new Gov has a unique appeal.
In 2000, white people were all being called racists by every company, university and institution in the United States.Stefanik will be solid going forward but in 2028 she'd have to overcome a lot to supplant Vance, DeSantis, and even another female like Huckabee-Sanders. I'd kick the can on Stefanik to 2032 if Reps lose in 2028.
In 2000, white people were all being called racists by every company, university and institution in the United States.
In 2024, Jewish students who were pro-Israel were being protested and threatened at universities.
Stefanik went scorched earth on the latter but not on the former.
That bugs me.
You see Ann the Iowa pollster wasn't wrong...her poll motivated Republicans to go vote:
You have no idea whether that person was effective in their job or not. This is the nasty BS that makes the left wanna vote blue every time. It's not Christian. It's not fair and karma is real. Swing too far right and there is always an overcorrection to the left by the voters.
It's not, but I thought the same thing until I zoomed in on it. LOLIs that Matt Walsh in the bottom center? Lol!
Seems like she's trying to cover her ass now because she just lost all credibility, especially if she was supposed to be the "gold standard"Wrong and motivating don't mutually exclude each other. Is Selzer a Democrat? Because her rationalizing this seems to indicate she is
Doubt she would take it if offered. She's on a higher level than press secI said in my redpilled group chat that Trump should put Tulsi as press secretary. She is way over-qualified but as a former congressperson she'll know how to navigate those waters and hold her own against the non-sensical left wing journalists.
I can see N.J. (maybe...maybe), but Conn? Don't see that.
You have no idea whether that person was effective in their job or not. This is the nasty BS that makes the left wanna vote blue every time. It's not Christian. It's not fair and karma is real. Swing too far right and there is always an overcorrection to the left by the voters.