It's in-person voting and Trump/Vance have been encouraging people to vote early, so I would have to say it's a good sign.Heard on abc news that there is record early voting in Georgia. Is that good or bad for Trump?
It's in-person voting and Trump/Vance have been encouraging people to vote early, so I would have to say it's a good sign.Heard on abc news that there is record early voting in Georgia. Is that good or bad for Trump?
As if anyone with a working brain actually believed the previous stats...
"In working to flip seats currently held by Democrats, the Senate Leadership Fund plans to spend $67.5 million on TV, radio and digital ad reservations in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The super PAC, run by close McConnell allies, will add $28 million in outside spending to Republicans’ effort to unseat Sen. Bob Casey in Pennsylvania, $17 million in Wisconsin to target Sen. Tammy Baldwin, and $22.5 million in Michigan, where the parties are fighting over an open seat now held by Democrats."REVEALED: Dirty Mitch McConnell Is Up to His Old Tricks – Is Not Funding Kari Lake or Ted Cruz in Their US Senate Races when BOTH are Locked in Tight Races (VIDEO)
REVEALED: Dirty Mitch McConnell Is Up to His Old Tricks - Is Not Funding Kari Lake or Ted Cruz in Their US Senate Races when BOTH are Locked in Tight Races (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
It was widely reported that in the 2022 election cycle, Mitch McConnell funded horrible RINO Lisa Murkowski in Alaska against her Republican candidate but did not fund Blake Masters in Arizona.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Prayer sent.Headed out for MRI. Y'all behave.
The life long Southern Baptist Sunday School teacher....voting for Kamala and all her far liberal, anti-Biblical policies.
Everyone involved in that sham bullshit committee should be forced to serve prison sentences of a combined length of all the years they locked up their J6 political prisoners.
I think there was just that much dislike/hate for Hillary by a large enough group of people, that she couldn't win. Bernie was the media darling, but I'm saying just pick any random Dem from the House or Senate or Governor, who had more than 1 term in office, and that person would have done better than Hillary.You couldn't be more wrong.
Their only other option was Bernie, and he would have been destroyed on a national level w/ his policies/beliefs. The country was definitely not ready for that.
That and more lib voters. They can't be sure that babies they have will grow up corrupt and evil like themselves and vote lib. They can ensure that if they bring them in with the promise of free stuff, these people will jump at the chance because they are lazy and uneducated.Yes, you do. That is why you libs want to import so much labor ... bc low fertility rates. A$$hole.
💯Govt was the shelter for the overproduction of colleges and universities. The system was self-replicating and ever-expanding with no curbs to the limits of it. That's the trouble with tribbles.
It's a really cute idea to offer free college to some people because they can't afford it, while others pay full price, but what does that to the actual value of an education? (WHAT happens when a company over-produces a product and saturates the market? Prices drop because perceived value drops.)
The problem with govt "higher ed" is that they are budget driven. They need to keep the budget increasing to keep expanding and keep up with inflation, causing expenses to increase, while people as a rule do less and less work, necessitating more and more employees to get the same work accomplished.... Then you need more buildings and more land to house staff and maintenance... then you need more money to operate more facilities, then you need to upgrade....
You also need more students to justify the budgets, but they can't all graduate with the current number of depts, so you add more depts, more majors, more degrees, and then more instructors who do less and less instructing and need more assistance to teach classes, so you need more graduate students for cheaper labor... and the schools all wind up putting out more and more graduates with less and less valuable skills for fewer and fewer jobs.
So... the govt became the safe haven for a while. Now those same people are being absorbed by industry and the market, and businesses and markets are failing, while at the same time there's not enough skilled at repairing or building anew what is needed.
Good lord. We are lower than a banana republic at this point.
But libs here will continue to spew disinformation from the old reports when the conversation turns to how bad crime has become lately with the influx of millions of criminals across the border.Surprise...Surprise.
The FBI makes a big announcement that crime is down statistically (even though anyone paying attention knows that is ridiculous)...dems and media get their talking point and just like job numbers and other things a little while later we quietly get some more accurate numbers.
From the article:
When the FBI originally released the “final” crime data for 2022 in September 2023, it reported that the nation’s violent crime rate fell by 2.1%. This quickly became, and remains, a Democratic Party talking point to counter Donald Trump’s claims of soaring crime.
But the FBI has quietly revised those numbers, releasing new data that shows violent crime increased in 2022 by 4.5%. The new data includes thousands more murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults.
The Bureau – which has been at the center of partisan storms – made no mention of these revisions in its September 2024 press release.
RCI discovered the change through a cryptic reference on the FBI website that states: “The 2022 violent crime rate has been updated for inclusion in CIUS, 2023.” But there is no mention that the numbers increased. One only sees the change by downloading the FBI’s new crime data and comparing it to the file released last year.
“I have checked the data on total violent crime from 2004 to 2022,” Carl Moody, a professor at the College of William & Mary who specializes in studying crime, told RealClearInvestigations. “There were no revisions from 2004 to 2015, and from 2016 to 2020, there were small changes of less than one percentage point. The huge changes in 2021 and 2022, especially without an explanation, make it difficult to trust the FBI data.”
Extensive Revisions in Violent Crime Stats
The actual changes in crimes are extensive. The updated data for 2022 report that there were 80,029 more violent crimes than in 2021. There were an additional 1,699 murders, 7,780 rapes, 33,459 robberies, and 37,091 aggravated assaults.
Me and my wife watch Gutfeld every morning (YouTube) Tuesday-Saturday. The Five in the evenings. The only currently running shows we watch. Everything else is old tv shows of the past.
For the MRI machine? 😁 JkPrayer sent.
I certainly hope that in the future Taco Bell doesn't win the franchise wars like in Demolition Man because, I don't eat Taco Bell. I would be resigned to be having to eat Rat Burgers which would be an upgrade really.
Prayers for good news...Headed out for MRI. Y'all behave.
Prayers 🙏 sent your way.Headed out for MRI. Y'all behave.
Then good that McConnell's Pac is putting their money behind the Pub Senate candidate there. Back potential winners, not losers.Harris is in serious trouble in Michigan. She is dramatically underperforming Clinton and Biden among black voters, Muslim voters and union voters in that state.