Actually, I hope she keeps that loser... just makes it easier to beat them.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Has the press changed the definition of stolen valor yet
Dems had a chance to take advantage of the abortion issue. They then chose a ticket which backs full term abortions. I don’t think the American people are gonna vote for that. Maybe the steal is already secured and they’re just gonna tell us exactly what they plan to do. If so, we have become Venezuela.
Advice for the future - don't quote someone's name and then say "ppl like..."
Why? Because you don't know me and I don't know what you're talking about with regards to a flag outside of a house. You're trying for attention and it's odd. If I actually say something you have an issue with, then we can talk. You clearly just want to argue with someone tonight and I've been reading a book.
This is from the Didache, which is codification of early 1st century Church teaching. Teachings of the Apostles. Similar passages are found in the Epistle of Barnabas.
“You shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is born,” and those who do so are judged “murderers of children, destroyers of the handiwork of God.” (Chapters 2 and 5)
Now you may say, that’s not in the Bible! And if that’s your position, then I can only assume you submit to the Bible alone as the authoritative inspired Word of God for all matters of faith and practice which is going to open up a whole other can worms for you on this matter.
My advice, don’t try and speak on Gods behalf on this subject.
...but she's currently leading.
Yeah, and I don't want that either. It'll invariably be turned against me when wielded by the other side. Just saying that what he said in that clip is true, and not a sign of tyranny. Depends on the context.
Those crazy Irish.
I don't understand your position. You seem to be speaking on God's behalf.
There are literally millions of books which aren't in the Bible for one reason or another. Choosing among the non-canonical seems a bit of hubris. (I'd add On Civil Disobedience by Thoreau and Letter from a Birmingham Jail by King. But who asked me, right?)
The Epistle of Barnabas's chief thrust is that the Jews misunderstood their own sacred writing. Are you just going to pick and choose among the points of this letter? In for a penny, in for a pound.
As has been mentioned before, the only mention of causing the death of a fetus in the OT treats it as a property crime.
Anyone can have their own judgment on the issue, but I don't see how Christians can substitute their own judgment for what they claim is Divine Revelation.
The 1A protects all speech, including “misinformation” and “ hate”, whatever these are. But it only protects you from government action or reprisal. It doesn’t stop you from getting your ass kicked for calling someone a racist name, or from being fired by a private company for similar speech. You also can’t utter speech that may cause imminent public disorder or panic, ie, yelling fire in a crowded theater.
Actually, I’m in favor of censoring nothing and leaving it up to individuals to make up their own minds as to what is offensive what is nonsense or bullshite.
That’s the way we used to do it .
Call Vance weird all ya want. This guy is an effing clown. And a dangerous one at that.
Maybe waiting for the SS to get their shit together or maybe he’s interviewing outside security teams.
You're trying to split hairs but the First does not protect lies. To use the classic 'shouting fire in a crowded theater' example that everyone agrees upon, if you shout fire and there is one, and someone is trampled to death in the resulting squeeze for the exits, you're protected by the First. Same situation, but you shout fire and there isn't one, you're lying, the First does not protect and you can be prosecuted for that speech. I agree I don't want a government bureaucrat labeling 'Hilary is a poopyface!' misinformation. But in terms of actual, out and out falsehoods, the First Amendment is not a catchall.
Obviously it isn’t because the libs spent every hour of every day during Covid doing just that.
Ha! I KNEW it. I called this earlier today. It was only a matter of time before they tried to twist this to somehow imply Vance was an actual physical threat.
Trump doesn’t need to beat THEM, he needs to beat the steal
Vance walked up there with his own secret service detail. There was zero threat. What do they think he’s going to do?
Dionsysus, suffice it to say that I'm far more familiar with the "clear and present danger" standard than you are, but this issue is not about not shouting fire in a crowded theatre, and, if you think it is, then your IQ is possibly a few points lower than I would've guessed.
"Hate speech" and "Misinformation" laws have nada, and I mean ZERO, to crowded theaters and fires within, and have EVERYTHING to do with some guy on Twitter running his mouth about vaccines or bitching about whatever religion or race. You can NOT ban "Misinformation". You can NOT ban "hate speech" against whoever you hate. But, yes, you can prosecute some idiot for inducing panic if he yells fire in a crowded theater, probably. So, was Walz talking about false fire alarms in theaters?
This is so CRINGY. It’s pathetic the mainstream media gives her a pass. Utterly phony, and the audience (if they had any self respect) would call her out and nail her on it.
It is absolutely tyranny when the government gets to determine what’s truth or not and what’s allowed to be seen or heard.
Have you kept up with the way democrats play politics? There are no rules anymore. No one remembers 3 weeks ago. The media change the story every two weeks. Kamala has contradicted herself evertime she opens her mouth. No one cares.
Trump can say whatever he wants at this point. He could defend the earth being round and the sky blue and fact checkers will attack him.
There is no point in caring how the game is played anymore. The stakes are too high and the other side will try and kill you and destroy everyone whoever stood bt your side to win. If your not willing play the same game and just accept losing with dignity then you are still just losing.
The left seems hell bent on burning the whole thing down in order to win. We have to show them we will light the damn match if need be
Stop prancing around like a drunk ballerina acting like you're the smartest person in the room. You're not. Every one of us knows that the court has expanded multiple times. Do you know why Presidents haven't TRIED IT since Roosevelt? Hmm, smart guy? Do you even know the LAST time it was successfully expanded? The very fact that you think this is a good strategy shows how stupid you really are.
"I heard" yeah that's the story of your life, isn't it? You wouldn't know a fact if it struck you square in the ballsack.
I guess you conveniently missed the big discussion and posting of the youtube video of Bryson DeChambeau playing 18 with Trump just a couple of weeks ago. You're a total MORON because you trust what you "hear" rather than actually WITNESSING it. Trump could give you 10 strokes and still kick your flabby ass.
Oh, fetuses don't have feet or lives? Duh. Stop trying to devilsplain scripture to a Bible Scholar.
Last edited:
If he does, it SHOULD put Trump back in the White House (assuming he can hold North Carolina and take Georgia this time).
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. You're cool too. And I agree absolutely they will cheat. That's why I was hoping we could put up a candidate who would win by such a large margin that even cheating wouldn't be enough. I'm worried Trump won't be able to do that. Hope like hell I'm wrong.
I agree I think he's actually still ahead, but the lead is dwindling and it has to stay ahead of the cheating. That's my concern.
