She doesn’t have to. Her numbers are trending up. The MSM is behind her and not going to call her out. Every Dem knows if she gets on tv to answer questions, she’s going to look stupid. Worked great for Biden. It will work again here.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
There is not a better individual to lead America during these times than Kamala. Iran, Russia, N Korea and others will fully respect her and be scared of her. Her knowledge of economics will bring wealth to all and she will heal this nation as one.
"You want to stand up to the man? Try calling yourself a conservative. Say you want to get married, have kids, & teach them to pledge allegiance to our country." Hahahahahaha. Yeah, your pledging allegiance to them is the way to stand up to the man... Hahahahahahaha
How bout that "Kamala Crash"?
Bbbbuuuutt MSM says everything's fine?
Bbbbuuuutt MSM says everything's fine?
Absolutely not. Warning and wanting are two different things.
That's an inaccurate application though. He's saying that the definitions you're using to define what is a man or woman aren't precise enough, not that they don't exist. Exactly the issue in the initial paradox, that your referenced fallacy is a subset of.
-edit-
I'm going to put my posts this morning down to sitting here debating whether my lower back pain was a kidney stone coming on. After a couple of hours, I'm no longer in pain.
First, you mis-state the facts of the debate. First, I did not deny that some people define sexes by either the existence of gonads or ovaries. But it is a definition. It's akin to saying "All unmarried men are bachelors." If I remember the terms from almost 60 years ago, that's a synthetic statement. Not much use, but if you want to continue to argue from definitions, knock yourself out.
The foundational position of of that POV is that gender is biologically determined. So, the wider debate is whether or not that's always true. People certainly do tend to follow their birth genitals to find their sexuality. For most people that isn't much of a search. But utility and certainty are in conflict. Nature blurs things. Some people (1 in 4000) get a double dose. 1 of each. When it comes to definitions, Nature doesn't read dictionaries. And that's merely the question of plumbing. Apparently far more people than I imagined like Something Else. And that's from as far back as they remember. One would think that the party with a gender-fluid VP candidate would be more understanding.
You know what you'll probably never hear?
Stock traders for Kamala.
Worst stock plunge since 1987. We're WITH HER!!!!!
Stock traders for Kamala.
Worst stock plunge since 1987. We're WITH HER!!!!!
I don't think it's real, but fits the bill and makes me laugh.
Exactly. It’s even worse when he’s keeping the text of democrat bills secret and strong arming republicans to vote for democrat bills.
Spending bills should be done how they were historically done, not with secret multi thousand page pork filled omnibus.
It is definitively the argument. You are claiming the sexes are not distinct because there exists a mix of characteristics between them. Your claim (the "evidence" you give in support of it) is the continuum fallacy, not your (mis)understanding of what is meant by a.continuum of states or your example you use in objection.
But never mind that for a second. For illustrative purposes, let's piggyback on your example there. What you are actually arguing, unwittingly or willfully, is that if upon inspection you found a Pear in basket A, it must be an Apple because someone told you we only have Apples in basket A. Or, since you found a Pear in basket A amoungst all those Apples, then that basket must really be basket B! That is your "logic."
Oh, and your argument against me that there isn't a continuum of states is itself logically fallacious, a straw man. I never said every collection of items is a continuum; the existence of such has no bearing whatsoever on your committal of the continuum fallacy to make your argument." anywya. It is also wholly inconsistent with the "reasoning" that got you people here, namely gender (which was/is dishonestly used interchangeably with sex) is a specturm (continuum) according to Gender Theory, which is itself psuedo-scientific and riddled with fallacy .
No, I've misstated nothing and these are separate issues.
My point is you are not holding yourself to the same standard you expect of others, of Trmp, of whomever. IF you are going to criticize others for logically fallacious arguments, then yours must be air-tight. They are not. They never are.
I was clear from the get-go that that was the only thing I was willing to discuss with you, not the intricacies of whose politicians are bigger liars or of how nature blurs things or whatever else. Science defines biological male vs female clearly and unequivocally, and it is from that basis and that basis alone certain things, like these Olympic fights, must be adjudicated. Everything else is just social and cultural norms that the vast majority of people don't have any issue with, believe it or not. The vast majroity of american conservatives I meet are actually "live and let live." You are blurring the lines between those two, not nature or the political other's opinion.
Sex is clearly defined scientifically; believe it or not.
LOL.....Wall Street crashing again today. Crashed worldwide based on (from what I read) fears of our stock market and economy crashing.
Wall Street fear index going up.
Dismal job report on Friday......
........but........
www.foxbusiness.com
Wall Street fear index going up.
Dismal job report on Friday......
........but........
Biden said he 'cured the economy' days before recession fears spark market selloff
President Biden is facing heat online Monday after claiming that he "cured the economy" just days before a major crash.
Don't understand a bit of this. When were spending bills last done "historically"? BTW, House writes up all spending bills.
Last edited:
Gender isnt biological but sex definitely is. Putting on a dress doesn't make one biologically less male nor remove all the physical advantages.
This is really such a no brainier thing ever. The fact libs cant concede this shows how nuts it all really is. Because you see, if they admit this, theyre admitting all the "women are as strong as men" insanity was also bs. The equality and equity topple too.
The whole thing is a loony bin house of cards.
I’ve been telling you for months to keep championing the benefits of Kamalanomics (fka Bidenomics). No need to stop now.
Just realize some of us are much smarter than you. Have much better information sources. Knew the economy has been shit for months despite the fake Biden admin numbers.
As always though, you lash out and attack everyone who was trying to inform you, rather than attacking those who were feeding you the bullshit lies.
OK, then why wouldn't she sit on a Delaware beach?
Last edited:
I know you don’t understand. Probably have to go back to the 90s. The past couple decades it seems like everything has been emergency continuing resolutions and omnibus appropriations bills, not separate, timely appropriations bills.
Why are you faulting Mitch for this given all spending bills must originate in the House? You do understand that, right? Practices of the last 30+ years aren't historical? Even old man me thinks 30 years is a long enough time to be historical.
I would assume Blinken is the acting Pres right now as Kamala is doing everything but VP work right now and Biden is coasting into the last 5 months.
I like Blinken, he seems he is the middle for the most part. He can hold a PC and answer questions like a normal person compared to both sides currently.
You’re right. Mitch can do no wrong. He has nothing to do with the way spending bills have gotten through the senate. Have a great day.
Hurricane, middle east, economic collapse.
I think President Harris HAS to hold a press conference. If she can't do that, what makes anyone think she can be the "elected" POTUS?
It's incomprehensible, to me, that anyone could vote for that mess.
I think President Harris HAS to hold a press conference. If she can't do that, what makes anyone think she can be the "elected" POTUS?
It's incomprehensible, to me, that anyone could vote for that mess.
Emotion and tribalism, the inherent difficutly humans have with admitting they were wrong.
2024 or 2020? The evidence is overwhelming.
2024 or 2020? The evidence is overwhelming.
Former US Attorney Tells MSNBC ‘There’s Absolutely No Chance’ Trump’s DC Trial Happens Before Election
Joyce Vance on Monday said there is no possibility of former President Donald Trump's Washington, D.C., trial taking place before the November election.
dailycaller.com
The rest of the trials are dead in the water; as they should be. Everyone knows it but the prosecutors...
Those definitions are just a model to describe biology though. Models are approximations that cover generalities. The issue at hand is one of specifics that transcend those general models. Not every person is XX with female genitalia or XY with male genitalia. Most people are, so those categories are useful. But that doesn't mean the labels dictate reality. They're just labels. Reality is reality. And there are many more sex realities for humans than just two. As illustrated by these boxers.
That's just marxist "reasoning," and is prima facia absurd, unscientific.
Worse than what was discussed previously...not worth any more time than I just gave it.
You're still making a junior high debate argument from definition. The idea that scientists don't acknowledge inter-sex states is fatuous. I was informed by a scientist of the 1-4000 incidence of births with two sex states just the other day.
So, yeah. Some people make arguments from definitions. Anyone can make a definition. The question is what to do about physical reality.
I can't address the people you meet but Trumpism/conservatism does not support live and let live. Who makes all the taunting howling jokes about trans people on this board? (Conservatives have all but disappeared except as a kind of self-congratulation. "I'm not a Trumper. I'm a conservative." )
What was/is your alternative? Shut the government down?
As far as his being able to do NO wrong, that's a bs absolute black/white on your part - showing you have nothing to say that he hasn't been an overall good for KY & the USA.
