ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
BS. Jake Tapper has been on CNN every day calling the protests antisemitic. They’re pearl-clutching same as y’all, just from a liberal perspective rather than a chud one.
GTYa5uKXQAEYNoN
 
Who was Killswitch? I don't think that guy ever slept...every page he had like 15+ posts on them.
I and others thought it was the old Morg. Same pattern of writing. Lot of references to the Memphis area, type of work, etc.

He never bothered me. Agreed with much of what he posted.
 
Is the entirety of the Kamala Harris campaign, and the remainder of Biden’s presidency, going to be one long cheap fake?

Everything is either a total fabrication of Trump and Vance positions, a literal erasure of the past or rewrite of history, or just a completely fake video like “Biden” speaking “live” or Obama endorsing Kamala.
 
"Hey Peggy Sue!! Come check this out. I told guy on the internet JD Vance bang'd his mom! LOL"

I’m actually curious if your thoughts have changed now that you’ve seen the evidence Vance supports IVF (including signing on to a bill that would have stripped Medicaid funding for states that prohibited it), his contextual comments that “childless cat ladies” has nothing to do with women who wanted kids, and that the Alabama legislature passed legislation to fix the quirk in the law after the court ruling that banned IVf for a short period.

Edit: and given that your disdain for Vance was predicated on lies, are you reassessing everything else you hear about Trump and Vance from the media?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat


He looks like the Atlanta Child Murderer.

We all started in the same place and will finish this life in the same place. We are born and die. That's where this nutjob of a candidate is wrong on both counts.

It's our choices along the way that determine where we go and how we get there in between. Whether on our knees or standing up for others.
Whether choosing the easy route of having others do the work for us, or choosing to work hard and smart to get things done.
What we decide matters, and following our own bad decisions up with more bad decisions is not the answer.

Not one real socialist is wanting to move to another socialist country to live. They know they can't afford to do that or they'd have left already. Only a few of the very rich have left, and they're not true socialists. They're not giving up their wealth for poor people to have homes. They're not using their money except for themselves, but shallow and selfish people that want to be them- follow them.

The shallow people that are led around in this manner are the same people that would never choose a life like Jesus lived, so there's little point in engaging with them whatsoever. They'll follow in the footsteps of the false because it's in their heart to do so.

We see the proof of that here every day.
 
I’m actually curious if your thoughts have changed now that you’ve seen the evidence Vance supports IVF (including signing on to a bill that would have stripped Medicaid funding for states that prohibited it), his contextual comments that “childless cat ladies” has nothing to do with women who wanted kids, and that the Alabama legislature passed legislation to fix the quirk in the law after the court ruling that banned IVf for a short period.

Edit: and given that your disdain for Vance was predicated on lies, are you reassessing everything else you hear about Trump and Vance from the media?

While I still sit in the exact chair as 12 hours ago, I must admit I have not given much more thought to closeted JD Vance. However, despite your attempts to allege some types of deception, nothing I said was incorrect (though in a slight daze I did indicate it was legislation not judicial decision in Alabama that led to halting IVF procedures). JD Vance, of course, did vote against IVF Protections. What the man says is literally worthless. He's been proven to be two-faced over and over. He's a flip-flopper to a degree that gives John Kerry whiplash. His voting record speaks for itself.

And, of course, he did say Democrats are controlled by "childless cat women". This is a different issue than IVF. My guy @DreadLox followed up on some other excellent points on why JD Vance is a liability for Donald Trump. Trump's campaign since the Biden debate has been actually a very effective campaign. The one-two punch of picking Vance and Biden stepping down set him back drastically.
 
While I still sit in the exact chair as 12 hours ago, I must admit I have not given much more thought to closeted JD Vance. However, despite your attempts to allege some types of deception, nothing I said was incorrect (though in a slight daze I did indicate it was legislation not judicial decision in Alabama that led to halting IVF procedures). JD Vance, of course, did vote against IVF Protections. What the man says is literally worthless. He's been proven to be two-faced over and over. He's a flip-flopper to a degree that gives John Kerry whiplash. His voting record speaks for itself.

And, of course, he did say Democrats are controlled by "childless cat women". This is a different issue than IVF. My guy @DreadLox followed up on some other excellent points on why JD Vance is a liability for Donald Trump. Trump's campaign since the Biden debate has been actually a very effective campaign. The one-two punch of picking Vance and Biden stepping down set him back drastically.


Well again you’re falling for the trick where politicians slap a label on a bill filled with poison pills then criticize people who vote against it based on the title.

There’s a small, small tiny percent of people on the country opposed to IVF. History and the record show Vance is not one of those people.

I knew absolutely nothing about Vance’s IVF stance prior to democrats making it an issue, and just a few minutes of research clarifies he supports it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDC888
Well again you’re falling for the trick where politicians slap a label on a bill filled with poison pills then criticize people who vote against it based on the title.

There’s a small, small tiny percent of people on the country opposed to IVF. History and the record show Vance is not one of those people.

I knew absolutely nothing about Vance’s IVF stance prior to democrats making it an issue, and just a few minutes of research clarifies he supports it.

Except...he voted against an IVF Protection bill. No mental gymnastics needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MidseasonTweak
Well again you’re falling for the trick where politicians slap a label on a bill filled with poison pills then criticize people who vote against it based on the title.

There’s a small, small tiny percent of people on the country opposed to IVF. History and the record show Vance is not one of those people.

I knew absolutely nothing about Vance’s IVF stance prior to democrats making it an issue, and just a few minutes of research clarifies he supports it.


"No, JD Vance said he supports IVF!"

JD Vance also said "Im a Never Trump Guy". He has no credibility.
 
Except...he voted against an IVF Protection bill. No mental gymnastics needed.

lol you are a gullible fool

Just because someone calls something an IVF protection bill, that doesn’t mean it’s what it does, that doesn’t mean it does other stuff, and regardless JE Vance’s opinion on IVF should not have any impact on your ability to access it as a matter of principle.
 
lol you are a gullible fool

Just because someone calls something an IVF protection bill, that doesn’t mean it’s what it does, that doesn’t mean it does other stuff, and regardless JE Vance’s opinion on IVF should not have any impact on your ability to access it as a matter of principle.

So now you're believing JD Vance's opinions? Which opinions are you believing exactly?

Do you also think that people with children deserve more than one vote, like Vance?
 
More of this.

Public university sued over alleged use of student fees to support leftist political group​

A recent graduate of St. Cloud State University in Minnesota is suing the university, alleging that she was forced to pay a fee that went to a liberal student activist group.​

Tayah Lackie’s lawsuit contends that a mandatory fee going to a political agenda that she disagrees with violates the First Amendment because it compels speech.​



 
  • Like
Reactions: Girthang and blubo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT