ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Zero chance these are RD supporters. Antifa can’t even make it look somewhat realistic. Looks like some masked losers from Berkeley that got bussed to Disney by Soros.
Absolutely guarantee that those are ANTIFA fake haters. The vast majority of hate crimes in the US are hate hoaxes. They project.

Further, if we take them at their word they are Socialists. No one on the right is a Socialist. That is clearly the communist left.
 
Last edited:
When in doubt, cry racism?
Nah, but he is a wealthy Jewish businessman and your side has made him some personal enemy for years for some bizarre reason, to the point of blaming this person for everything under the sun. He's another boogeyman for the far right. This thread mocked the left for saying "Russia Russia Russia" even though you guys say "Soros Soros Soros". And also "Antifa Antifa Antifa."
 
How are you guys holding up after having the leading Republican candidate arrested more times than he's won elections? Independents will surely flock to his side in 2024 like never before. I don't see any way Trump loses if he's the nominee. MAGA Train toot toot. Get in and let's win!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MadaboutBlue
Bc they know James will believe them

CNN's coverage is what he takes away from all this? I don't blame him. I can't imagine trying to defend Trump's actions constantly so its now a game of whataboutism mixed with rage. I wouldn't mind Greenwald's take on how Trump is actually going to win next year seeing as how he's the leading candidate for R's and keeps getting indicted.

FWIW, Fox hires former Trump people, MSNBC hires former Biden and Obama people, and Newsmax gives nuts like MTG a platform. It's what these companies do, so I don't even disagree with his point, just that its funny that's one of his main takeaways on a day his probable nominee is arrested. Talk about getting upset over one thing when all the concern should be on the other thing.
 
Biden setting precedence for the possibility of his old ass being arrested if election doesn’t work out. 😀
Trump asked the DoJ to prosecute Comey and Clinton. There's a memorandum written by McGahn telling Trump that he had to butt out, that such things weren't legal.

Accusing Biden is pure nonsense. "Weaponization" is just a slogan. Trying to win the news cycle and stir up the dopes. There's a saying that for Republicans every accusation is a confession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jameslee32
Your OPINION. Your BELIEF.
It's not a "baby" until it can survive on it's own outside the mother's body.
A clump of unformed cells inside another person's body is NONE of your business.
STOP trying to tell other people what they can and can't do with THEIR own body.
A one year old cannot survive on it's own, are you saying it is okay to kill the one year if it is inconvenient?

Let me break this down for you:
Premise: It is morally wrong to intentionally kill an innocent person.
Premise: Abortion intentionally kills an innocent person.
Conclusion: Abortion is morally wrong.

How do you feel about a new law Dems are proposing that allows the state to force you by law to give your kidney to someone in the state in need of a lifesaving kidney transplant??? If you are a match it will be mandatory.

All life is precious and worth saving right?
So Dem's are trying to tell other (LIVING) people what they can do with their own body?
 


The most amazing thing about trump is how he manages to get good people to just put aside beliefs they’ve held their entire lives and give them all up to just cry over him and give their life savings to him. He was right, he could shoot someone in broad daylight and people like this lady would blame the victim and have trumps back. Guarantee at one point she was normal and didn’t think that everyone in the world was wrong except Trump who is perfect in every way. I saw videos of pastors praying over him today. People who at one point I bet loved God and had real beliefs. All given up to follow Trump instead of following their beliefs they’ve likely held forever. I’ll never understand what people see in him that they’d completely destroy their lives and live penniless as long as the money goes towards trumps “legal fees”. And now half the country hates the FBI, DOJ, and any other institution that trump says is out to get him. If he said tomorrow that Jesus is actually evil, half this country would stop believing in Jesus and move onto whatever trump tells him. It’s incredible. It’s sad. And all for a failed game show host. I mean would you guys do this for Pat Sajak or Bob Barker if they promised a wall around the border or that they’d end abortion? I liked Obama, Bill Clinton, and others. But I’d never cry over them or give them money or worship them. Grow up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jameslee32
Nah, but he is a wealthy Jewish businessman and your side has made him some personal enemy for years for some bizarre reason, to the point of blaming this person for everything under the sun. He's another boogeyman for the far right. This thread mocked the left for saying "Russia Russia Russia" even though you guys say "Soros Soros Soros". And also "Antifa Antifa Antifa."
Woke Woke Woke
 
One cannot even explain to the leftist hivemind with it's inherent ineptitude that the purpose of a carpool lane is to encourage carpooling.
That wasn't the contention. Carpool lanes were just used as an example of how fetuses don't have legal personhood according to the law. I gave another example, tax dependencies, that you ignored. How about another, child support. Guy gets his girl pregnant and then Fs off so has to pay child support. When do those payments start? Birth. Not conception. And pregnancy is definitely an expense.
 
False. Can a pregnant woman drive in the carpool lane? Or any number of a thousand different examples? Fetuses are not legally recognized as persons under the law unless specifically instructed to as an exception, like fetal homicide laws. This is universally recognized even by your side, as Republicans in many states are trying to get fetal personhood laws passed.
If it is not a human, then what is it? A giraffe?

You do not have the facts on your side. Change sides.
 
I just worry about James when his dreams are shattered. Folks like Trump and Biden rarely suffer for any misdeeds that they might do.
I don't. That pos promotes raping other poster's granddaughters.

To quote Samuel L ...

atimetokill-samuelljackson.gif

Edit ... he actually said that. IDK how he is still allowed to post here. or anywhere for that matter.

But I'll get banned again.
 
CNN's coverage is what he takes away from all this? I don't blame him. I can't imagine trying to defend Trump's actions constantly so its now a game of whataboutism mixed with rage. I wouldn't mind Greenwald's take on how Trump is actually going to win next year seeing as how he's the leading candidate for R's and keeps getting indicted.

FWIW, Fox hires former Trump people, MSNBC hires former Biden and Obama people, and Newsmax gives nuts like MTG a platform. It's what these companies do, so I don't even disagree with his point, just that its funny that's one of his main takeaways on a day his probable nominee is arrested. Talk about getting upset over one thing when all the concern should be on the other thing.
Greenwald isn't a Trump sucker, he's an antiestablishment guy and Trump happens to scratch that itch. He doesn't so much defend Trump as use him to illustrate his problems with the media.
 
Craig Kilborn got indicted today?
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

5f7f21f2c655f6001969ee61

230613-donald-trump-court-sketch-ac-640p-4c7633.jpg

230613-donald-trump-courtroom-sketch-miami-arraignment-cs-d067a9.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sammysdad05
That wasn't the contention. Carpool lanes were just used as an example of how fetuses don't have legal personhood according to the law. I gave another example, tax dependencies, that you ignored. How about another, child support. Guy gets his girl pregnant and then Fs off so has to pay child support. When do those payments start? Birth. Not conception. And pregnancy is definitely an expense.

The same logical incoherence applies.

Unsurprisingly, you of course cannot see that.

But it's all beside the point since nature, not the law, defines when life begins, which is very well aND unambiguously understood by science to be at conception. You leftist reprobates there too of course only care about the science! ® when it's subservient to your agenda. Thanks again for showing just how warped "your" "logic" is ttoday for anybody to see. The point you are actually making is far different than what you think, and again, thanks for your engagement today in making it.
 
Long live the oldest grift in the world!
Oddly. not a transexual. A man of religious inclination, I believe. I wonder if there will be a series of hysteria-fueled attacks on religion. Maybe some acid remarks about children and religion. Baptism being ridiculed. Weekly (sometimes daily) Indoctrination under the auspices of churchmen. Horrified references to circumcision and the mutilation of genitals.
 
A one year old cannot survive on it's own, are you saying it is okay to kill the one year if it is inconvenient?

Let me break this down for you:
Premise: It is morally wrong to intentionally kill an innocent person.
Premise: Abortion intentionally kills an innocent person.
Conclusion: Abortion is morally wrong.


So Dem's are trying to tell other (LIVING) people what they can do with their own body?

There is no greater innocence than the preborn baby dependent on her mother, society at large to protect her.
 
Oddly. not a transexual. A man of religious inclination, I believe. I wonder if there will be a series of hysteria-fueled attacks on religion. Maybe some acid remarks about children and religion. Baptism being ridiculed. Weekly (sometimes daily) Indoctrination under the auspices of churchmen. Horrified references to circumcision and the mutilation of genitals.
Nah just examining children's genitals and women's menstrual cycles. Freedumb though. Don't tread on me as well.
 
The same logical incoherence applies.

Unsurprisingly, you of course cannot see that.

But it's all beside the point since nature, not the law, defines when life begins, which is very well aND unambiguously understood by science to be at conception. You leftist reprobates there too of course only care about the science! ® when it's subservient to your agenda. Thanks again for showing just how warped "your" "logic" is ttoday for anybody to see. The point you are actually making is far different than what you think, and again, thanks for your engagement today in making it.
The Torah treats the fetus as property.

If you imagine the writers of The Torah were leftists, you've lost the thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadaboutBlue
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT