ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
My opinion has nothing to do with it. Come out with whatever point you're trying to make
This. You are being baited or trolled. There is no "honest debate" with his mentality anymore. Sadly
Either the current system that produced Soros and his billions is justified or it isn't. Corrupt politicians didn't make his money for him. No one here will post that Soros deserves his billions or the control over their lives they bring because they don't believe he does. But neither will they just come out and say no either because it would mean they have to re-examine the world that made it happen, American capitalism, and their view of that world that they've always been taught was so Great and Exceptional.
 
Either the current system that produced Soros and his billions is justified or it isn't. Corrupt politicians didn't make his money for him. No one here will post that Soros deserves his billions or the control over their lives they bring because they don't believe he does. But neither will they just come out and say no either because it would mean they have to re-examine the world that made it happen, American capitalism, and their view of that world that they've always been taught was so Great and Exceptional.
Did Soros even make most of his money here? Or is he just using the money he made elsewhere to buy district attorneys?
 
Either the current system that produced Soros and his billions is justified or it isn't. Corrupt politicians didn't make his money for him. No one here will post that Soros deserves his billions or the control over their lives they bring because they don't believe he does. But neither will they just come out and say no either because it would mean they have to re-examine the world that made it happen, American capitalism, and their view of that world that they've always been taught was so Great and Exceptional.
Perty sure soros made most of his initial riches while pilfering through the possessions of nazi (aka modern day liberalism) victims.

And once again, you double down on the lunacy.
 
Either the current system that produced Soros and his billions is justified or it isn't. Corrupt politicians didn't make his money for him. No one here will post that Soros deserves his billions or the control over their lives they bring because they don't believe he does. But neither will they just come out and say no either because it would mean they have to re-examine the world that made it happen, American capitalism, and their view of that world that they've always been taught was so Great and Exceptional.


We’ve explained it to you, you dunce. There are plenty of billionaires in the US who don’t buy corrupt politicians and push a left wing crime promoting agenda.

It’s not the billions, it’s the corrupt politicians with power he can buy.

You take away power from the politicians, and Soros can’t do anything.
 
Would be good if Dion just tried to state the point he’s trying to make. No one is happy with a system where Soros can exert influence because handfuls of people have so much power.

No one is happy with a system where Nancy Pelosi is free to trade on confidential information, when Americans are prohibited from doing the same.

Government corruption is not capitalism.
 
Soros’ earning of the billions have nothing to do with what he’s doing to the country with corrupt politicians.

Maybe I’ll try and make Dion’s point for him, but is anyone happy with a system where Pfizer can buy off officials in the federal government and have them push experimental shots into the arms of the vast majority of the population? Where the Sackler family can have a corrupt federal government allow it’s highly addictive opioids on the market?

No, no one is happy with that. But Pfizer and the Sacklers couldn’t make those billions without a ready, willing, powerful accomplice in the corrupt federal government.
 
Did Soros even make most of his money here? Or is he just using the money he made elsewhere to buy district attorneys?
Perty sure soros made most of his initial riches while pilfering through the possessions of nazi (aka modern day liberalism) victims.

And once again, you double down on the lunacy.
He made his money in hedge funds. Most of his early career was out of NYC. Soros Fund Management where he really hit it big is an American firm. Y'all high on that misinformation to defend your worldview.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
Government corruption is not capitalism.
It is if that "corruption" is legal. (Which you yourself pointed out with the Pelosi insider trading example.)
No, no one is happy with that. But Pfizer and the Sacklers couldn’t make those billions without a ready, willing, powerful accomplice in the corrupt federal government.
? You think people wouldn't buy opioids when a government wasn't there making them illegal? They'd have even more billions without the government in the way.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
Typical Democrat. Refuses to pay GD child support. Crooks.



Get outta here!
I have a feeling that this Arkansas judge is chomping at the bit to put his butt behind bars. He is scum and his mama and daddy are no better. They do not recognizer the little girl as their granddaughter. Sad. His day is coming.
 
Posted this first paragraph in the ai thread but I thought the rest belongs here and is interesting for discussion:

It's a bizarre paradox. All these people know full well it can absolutely mean the end of humanity yet they race to the cliff full speed ahead. It literally defies rational explanation.

Yet at the same time, much the same crowd will do most anything to avoid a sliding scale climate catastrophe that was supposed to be upon us 20 years ago.

Someone make it make sense
 
Today pedophiles have more reason to want to stay out of Florida. Legislation was signed by the Governor, the one some say is not getting anything done, to allow the death penalty for raping a child under the age of 12.

This is actually a challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court because not too long ago they ruled the death penalty does not apply to heinous crimes like rape. So, Florida will have a chance to argue that it does apply down here. It is law and a lot of Florida judges will be happy to apply it.

 
Considering they are so homogeneous and everyone is expected to contribute to society...quite a bit.

Unfortunately, we don't have that luxury here.

Keep dreaming about your 99% White society while comparing the US to them though.
What does this mean? That nonwhites don't contribute to society in your opinion?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
It is if that "corruption" is legal. (Which you yourself pointed out with the Pelosi insider trading example.)

? You think people wouldn't buy opioids when a government wasn't there making them illegal? They'd have even more billions without the government in the way.

No it’s not.

Had the FDA not endorsed OxyContin as safe, a lot of people who fell into opioid addiction would have never touched the stuff.
 
Wow, this is interesting to say the least. Out of $7,612,867 in media expenditures all but $1,500 has been attacks on one unannounced candidate. Trump is not attacking anyone but one person. Not Biden or any of the others. He is not even running on his record. $7,610,00 in attacks at one man. I smell someone very afraid. And why?

I think someone is living in Trump's head rent free. Keep sending him money, America needs to know how miserable Florida is. And did you know my Governor tried to stop my Social Security checks? Trump said so. :)

FvDrWMHXsAEfU2K
Seems like trump is in your head rent free. This is what happens in every primary. The top dogs go after each other. And this isn’t fear this is how trump does it. It’s exactly what he did in 2016. He ignored everyone except the top guy challenging him in the poll. Everytime, every debate, every ad. Remember bush? Rubio? Cruz? This is what trump brought to the rep party. Fighting back. Instead desantis supporters seem to be crying that trump is attacking him. Newsflash he’s trumps biggest rival right now and possibly the only one. Trumps attacks are working in the polls. He’s up 32 points. At one point he was down in the polls. There’s one poll that has trump up 46 points. There may be too much distance already for desantis to even launch a campaign. In trumps view though Ron is in his way. For better or worse it’s polítics and trump has caused. The reps to do a 180 on how they fight. Same as 2016 “this guy is mean. He’s always picking on this guy”. I think Ron thought he could beat trump on the high road but that’s not happening. The problem is when you throw everything at trump it gives him more to counter punch against and makes him stronger in the rep party bc it’s been a very long time since reps had a real bare knuckle fighter leading their party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
What does this mean? That nonwhites don't contribute to society in your opinion?
Of course not.

In this country we have people of all colors that don't contribute because they are given things for free.

It's clear you haven't studied homogeneous countries and their expectations of citizens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WTF Cat
No it’s not.

Had the FDA not endorsed OxyContin as safe, a lot of people who fell into opioid addiction would have never touched the stuff.
Doctors were prescribing it because they were paid to. People were taking it because they were prescribed it. No one was sitting on their couch at home reading their prescriptions double-checking, "Hey did the FDA endorse this? Martha, google that. Yep? Ok we're good. I only swallow FDA approved pills you see. Yessiree I'm an FDA and Oldsmobile man through and through." Acting like the FDA's the source of the problem and not a symptom is either naive or disingenuous. Even that endorsement was only for serious chronic pain, the incentivized doctors were the ones overprescribing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
Of course not.

In this country we have people of all colors that don't contribute because they are given things for free.

It's clear you haven't studied homogeneous countries and their expectations of citizens.
Then educate me. What are these expectations in homogeneous countries that our diversity precludes us from implementing here?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
Doctors were prescribing it because they were paid to. People were taking it because they were prescribed it. No one was sitting on their couch at home reading their prescriptions double-checking, "Hey did the FDA endorse this? Martha, google that. Yep? Ok we're good. I only swallow FDA approved pills you see. Yessiree I'm an FDA and Oldsmobile man through and through." Acting like the FDA's the source of the problem and not a symptom is either naive or disingenuous. Even that endorsement was only for serious chronic pain, the incentivized doctors were the ones overprescribing.


lol

How many doctors prescribe pharmaceuticals that failed the FDA approval process?
 
Last edited:
lol

How many doctors prescribe pharmaceuticals that failed the FDA approval process?
None. OxyContin was always going to be approved though. It works. It just should only be prescribed in cases where the benefits outweighs the side-effects. That was the issue, over-prescription. Handing them out for surgery recoveries and the like pitched as harmless, when they were meant for serious chronic pain as they're addictive. Again, you're grasping at straws blaming the FDA. They don't have control over use by doctors in that way.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: railsplitter67
Then educate me. What are these expectations in homogeneous countries that our diversity precludes us from implementing here?
The most important is that everyone must contribute in some form. We've already passed the point of no return for that in the US so your dream of a Nordic 99% White society has no hope here.
 
None. OxyContin was always going to be approved though. It works. It just should only be prescribed in cases where the benefits outweighs the side-effects. That was the issue, over-prescription. Handing them out for surgery recoveries and the like pitched as harmless, when they were meant for serious chronic pain as they're addictive. Again, you're grasping at straws blaming the FDA. They don't have control over use by doctors in that way.




If you’re understanding is the FDA has no role in the labeling and prescription of medication that contributed in a very large part to the over prescription by doctors who were relying on claims regarding the non-addictive nature of OxyContin, then there is no sense in continuing this discussion.

Sure there were certainly pill mills out there. But the FDA approved false and misleading information from Purdue many doctors innocently relied on, and that gave other doctors cover.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT