ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
And though I voted Trump, I'll admit that I'm ready for him to go away and let's just move forward. An election overturn would be the worst thing to ever happen to this country. I'm not ready to go there. Elections have been rigged/stolen before...and there will be many more in the future. But overturning on it's face what is a convincing win for Biden? Yikes. Can't imagine.

Move on. Fix it in 4 years. Trump lost because he was an asshole...similar to Bevin.
Yeah......lt's just let them steal because they won't do it again? Just get you a French name while you're at it.
 
Absolutely. Getting a bit tired of people on our side, on this board and on radio/TV harping about seeing the evidence. This is 90% a legal battle and 10% spin. No poker player starts the game by throwing their hand down for all to see.
Have you ever played online poker? You have about 10 seconds to check, bet or fold...if you don’t explicitly do one of those things they fold your hand.
Sounds like you’ve not been in a courtroom. If you claim you have evidence then you have to present that evidence to the defense for them to prepare for cross examination. Making claims of evidence you don’t have subjects you to charges of perjury...which are why if you read the complaints filed you’ll see no claims of widespread fraud.
 
What exactly do Trumplings expect? In every instance where they have been in front of a judge (often times Trump appointed judges) they have been tossed out of court on their heads... so are we just supposed to hand over the election to Trump because of a whole string of failed lawsuits and roundly disputed "evidence" that is debunked as fast as it is pulled out of someone's rearend? Seriously, what is the expectation with this? Bill is running around like everything needs to be proven in here as opposed to a court of law. It's been 16 days since 50,000 Trump poll watchers and a horde of seedy 3rd rate lawyers descended on the election and yet they can't get one single ruling by a Trump appointed judge?

Really, you're addicted to losing. There is so much losing you are begging for more losing. You've never seen such losing. Lose, lose, lose... that is your Drumpf legacy. Losing. Bigly.
 
I think the most telling thing Giuliani pointed out yesterday is...why didn't biden campaign? Well because the fix was in that's why it made no difference if he campaigned
Ive felt this way all along. They knew they didn't need to because there was massive voter fraud going on.
Between mumbly peg Biden and cackle queen, they had no excitement about their campaign.
 
“The clock is a double-edged sword in this election because if they don’t have enough time but if they can put forward a sufficiently strong case then they may be able to get some Republican Secretaries of States or legislatures to say, ‘Look, we just don’t have enough time to certify these electors’ and if they can bring down the number of electors, 35 [to] 37, from the 305 and bring it down to 267 or 268 then the election goes to the House, where the Republicans win.”

Dershowitz explained that the Trump Team’s legal strategy is to pull enough electors away from Joe Biden that he doesn’t meet the 270 threshold by the time the election needs to be certified. He also said there’s no possible way for President Trump to get to 270 electoral votes in time.

“The goal is to prevent Biden from getting 270, that’s why the clock is a double-edged sword,” he said.

According to the Harvard professor, Bush v. Gore will be referenced if and when the Trump campaign’s case makes its way to the Supreme Court. The reason: Trump’s Team is focusing on the Equal Protection Clause. Their argument is that not all voters were treated equally because some had their ballots counted with an observer while others didn’t. Some had rules set by other government officials and not the state legislatures, which the Supreme Court ruled against.

In order for these cases to make their way to the Supreme Court, Dershowitz said “the numbers have to be there,” meaning the Trump Team successfully pulls electors away from Biden so the former vice president is no longer at the 270 threshold. The other option is for Trump’s lawyers to provide “hard evidence” of irregularities occurring with voting machines, which could call into question hundreds of thousands of votes in various states.

“If that happens, then yes, it will go to the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz said. “I think at least under the Constitutional challenge, the Article 2 challenge in Pennsylvania, they have a pretty good chance of winning.”

 
Lookie here. Circuit courts have been reassigned

MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh
WI - Amy Coney Barrett
PA - Samuel A. Alito
GA - Clarence Thomas
Looked at the tweet below your post but it didn't say much. Who/how does the reassigning come about?
If it's rotating, I would this is divine intervention. Or does Roberts, Chief Justice, assign?
 
You really are an idiot. They didn't audit sh!t. They did the same recount they did before. Raffensperger is a crook and a liar.
Yep, the Georgia Secretary of State issued a press release that is a bald-faced lie, and you know this how exactly? You do know Raffensperger is a Republican right?
 
I want Trump to fight every tooth and nail for this.
I do, too. I want all of you to send him all the money you can right up until noon on Jan. 20 because 75% of your legal donations are going directly to his post presidency you naive rubes... have more rallies, too. Pile atop one another and breathe deeply while you're at it. Churn like a snake ball in the throes of Trump oiled up passion. Go all in. Give it all you've got. Do not go gently into that good prison cell. The SDNY and the FBI are licking their chops and it won't be long now. I want the disappointment to rise to a crushing height before collapsing in and swallowing you all. Like the climactic end of a horror movie. Washed out to sea never to be seen again with only a snail slime trail in your wakes. It will be the end of a long national nightmare and I thank you all for your part. Especially the end.
 
First, the claim in 2016 was that there was Russian interference in the form of a misinformation campaign to influence voters. Never was it suggested that they hacked or physically changed votes. The Mueller Report clearly found that the Russian interference did happen. It was also alleged that this was done with the knowledge/support of the Trump campaign, that could not be proven.

Regardless, HRC conceded the race on election night and Obama immediately shared information with Trump.

So what is you problem?
So you're saying russians for the first time since the start of the cold war decided to interfere in an election in 2016? Or is it a normal occurrence? Not okay, nonetheless. Also...they bought 100k in facebook ads...youre saying this overturned an election? Remember, the "proof" was how close the vote margin was in pa, mi, wi. Which wasn't as close as 4 states this time in bidens favor. Who was president when this happened, btw? Why do you automatically dismiss the spy king? Also, I remember nonstop "collusion" coverage. Nonetheless, there is no evidence this changed an election. So I'll ask again, did russian memes overturn an election? And considering bernie sanders beat Hillary in 2 of the 3 of wi, mi, pa...were the russians help influence for him? Again...its simple, did russia overturn the election, or are your facts that "Hillary is an alien" memes did it. Give me something concrete. I know they they ran an interference, but who undermined election more. Them, or ppl like Rachel Maddow where they could just kick their feet up and let her do the work? Bc its obvious their goal is to cause chaos and division. The media helped them mission accomplished. And you're proving my point: D's did the same thing, they take something that is true and apply it to something that's not. Just as now, fraud happens in every election...just not at large systematic levels. Were talking in handful of votes..not wide scale. Just as russians run scams...not ones that change votes on a massive scale

Did this coverage continue for 4 years no matter how flimsy the source. Here, here's a guide for you:

To make you feel better that article was written by a bernie supporter.

Did Stacy Abrams concede. Is there any proof that she was cheated? Did the media treat her as a hero? Where were you?

Also, Hillary said 2 weeks before this election that biden shouldn't concede. Because they were going to go right back into the russia excuse again. Where were you? Btw, the simplest question. Where was russia this time? Did putin give up? Or did trump run a more secure election? Has to be 1 of the 2. Btw, what do you think China was doing...did you hear about it? Why not?

Again. Take your medicine and admit...you are no different. Ill check back in
 
Last edited:
So you're saying russians for the first time since the start of the cold war decided to interfere in an election in 2016? Also...they bought 100k in facebook ads...youre saying this overturned an election? Remember, the "proof" was how close the vote margin was in pa, mi, wi. Which wasn't as close as 4 states this time.. who was president when this happened, btw? Why do you automatically dismiss the spy king? Also, I remember nonstop "collusion" coverage. Nonetheless, there is no evidence this changed an election. So I'll ask again, did russian memes overturn an election? And considering bernie sanders beat Hillary in 2 of the 3 of wi, mi, pa...were the russians help influence for him? Again...its simple, did russia overturn the election, or are your facts that "Hillary is an alien" memes did it. Give me something concrete. I know they they ran an interference, but who undermined election more. Them, or ppl like Rachel Maddow where they could just kick their feet up and let her do the work? Bc its obvious their goal is to cause chaos and division. The media helped them mission accomplished. And you're proving my point: D's did the same thing, they take something that is true and apply it to something that's not. Just as now, fraud happens in every election...just not at large systematic levels. Were talking in handful of votes..not wide scale. Just as russians run scams...not ones that change votes on a massive scale

Did this coverage continue for 4 years no matter how flimsy the source. Here, here's a guide for you:

To make you feel better that article was written by a bernie supporter.

Did Stacy Abrams concede. Is there any proof that she was cheated? Did the media treat her as a hero? Where were you?

Also, Hillary said 2 weeks before this election that biden shouldn't concede. Because they were going to go right back into the russia excuse again. Where were you? Btw, the simplest question. Where was russia this time? Did putin give up? Or did trump run a more secure election? Has to be 1 of the 2.

Again. Take your medicine and admit...you are no different. Ill check back in

Yep, because Russia obviously prospers with a stronger America.

Lol, I can totally see the wicked evil genius of Vlad Putin to put his country's interest aside for good buddy Trump
 




A panel on Dismantling Antisemitism that includes Rep. Rashida Tlaib and Marc Lamont Hill.





What's next? A panel on fighting incest that includes her...


900703791.jpg
 
Absolutely. Getting a bit tired of people on our side, on this board and on radio/TV harping about seeing the evidence. This is 90% a legal battle and 10% spin. No poker player starts the game by throwing their hand down for all to see.
Me too. I just don't understand why they think these lawyers would even consider doing that.
Ok Tucker, here you go, here is all our evidence, be sure and keep it to yourself though. Gimme a break. Tucker knows that, but he's just being a douche. He got his orders he's obeying like a good litle boy.
 
Me too. I just don't understand why they think these lawyers would even consider doing that.
Ok Tucker, here you go, here is all our evidence, be sure and keep it to yourself though. Gimme a break. Tucker knows that, but he's just being a douche. He got his orders he's obeying like a good litle boy.
Lawyers absolutely give reporters evidence to start to push the narrative their way.
 
Anyone else believe COViD was intentionally created in a Chinese lab?


Do I believe the democrats coordinated with China to release a deadly pandemic level virus in the United States? While seems plausible, no that’s insane.

Do I believe the democrats coordinated with the United States news media to act like a glorified cold was the end of the world in an effort to take down Trump? Of course I do. That’s not even debatable.

Saying the democrats coordinated with China on anything is just nonsense. China doesn’t coordinate with the democrats, they just ordinate.
 
Sidney Powell just now on Newsmax: "We have a number of smoking guns and we might need to get them witness protection. We have overwhelming evidence and a lot of it is terrifying".

We have pictures of the check stubs of people being paid to ballot harvest and do fraudulent coding.

She thinks Biden had 10 million or more fraudulent votes on his slate.

She is getting data but her rough estimate is several million dead people voting.

I mean this woman has talked the biggest game I've ever seen. Patriot of the century or freak nasty. There's no going back now.
 
What these idiots don’t seem to grasp is that “the media” aren’t the score keepers. They could throw out random numbers if they chose to do so. Only the states have the official counts. If states wanted, they could not report any numbers until the entire vote was counted.
So until the states' votes are certified, no reason to concede.
 
Sidney Powell just now on Newsmax: "We have a number of smoking guns and we might need to get them witness protection. We have overwhelming evidence and a lot of it is terrifying".

We have pictures of the check stubs of people being paid to ballot harvest and do fraudulent coding.

She thinks Biden had 10 million or more fraudulent votes on his slate.

She is getting data but her rough estimate is several million dead people voting.

I mean this woman has talked the biggest game I've ever seen. Patriot of the century or freak nasty. There's no in going back now.
I believe every bit of it. Every single word. The only ones that don’t, are just too blind to see it or simply don’t want to. One of the two.

EDIT: But....THERE’S NO EVIDENCE! [eyeroll]
 
  • Haha
Reactions: vanillaslice
That’s dumb. No matter who the lower courts rule for, the other side will appeal. The SCOTUS is the inevitable endgame. Amazing how stupid you sound compared to your arrogant posture.
The ultimate end game isn’t to even try to get counts in states overturned necessarily. I think the end game is to cast enough doubt in what took place that the SCOTUS eventually rules that the election was fraudulent or illegitimate and leaves it up to the states to ratify. In that case republicans have 26 states to democrats 24.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT