Who legit thought that video was a good idea? She looks like a drunk aunt at her college homecoming trying to give advice to college students.
What policies are in play to help disadvantaged youth? You can link an article and I’ll read it.False. Your ignorance is showing like a sluts undees.
There you go name calling again. I care deeply about the poor. That’s why I am concerned with another administration with tax cuts and trickle down policies. I’d love to eat crow on this. If Elon and Vivek are able to ramp down spending without enriching themselves with government contracts, I’ll sing their praises. I’ll remain skeptical until then.Best way to lift people out of poverty is for government to get out of the way. Let prices drop and wages rise.
Incidentally, even Jesus said the poor would always be with us.
But you're more like Judas Iscariot. You don't care about the poor. You just want your party masters to rule the country by buying votes with taxpayer money. That's why you're so nervous about Elon and Vivek butchering federal spending. It TERRIFIES you. Your comments about it give you away.
thats awesome, man. I dated a girl from shively for a year and spent a lot of time on Dixie. Lots of TLC needed for that area.Trying to keep the money that should be helping them from being diverted to illegal immigrants.
I also volunteer in 2 separate programs in West Louisville that are designed to help with both reading & math proficiency. Every single kid in those programs are born into generational poverty in a city that has been run by Democrats for 60+ years. I have no doubt that about 90% of them would/will be in jail or dead by the age of 20 if they don’t use education as a way out.
WTF are you doing to help them?
Don't like Stone...at all...but she is a smart lady (obviously doesn't apply it though). Has a reported IQ of 150ish and is a member of Mensa.Sharon attended Edinboro State University (obviously one of the most vigorous academic institutions in the world) studying creative writing and fine arts, likely the hardest double major in academia. Dropped out to pursue acting. Went back in 2016 to complete her degree. So, she definitely had the creds to know who is educated and who is not.
haha
Highly intelligent people are are capable of tremendous stupidity.Don't like Stone...at all...but she is a smart lady (obviously doesn't apply it though). Has a reported IQ of 150ish and is a member of Mensa.
In 23 seconds, she said the word 'work' 7 times. Queen of Word Salad rides again!
She lost because she's a horrible candidate. No accomplishments, Far Left agenda, a complete weirdo loser as a running mate, phony (putting on bad accents at different campaign stops), lying about Biden, the border, Trump, on and on. Has nothing to do with race or color. She was/is a terrible candidate.
Sharon Stone believes Trump was elected by uneducated voters. I saw numerous videos of Harris voters who were asked why they were voting for her and they couldn't say why. Well, what is her greatest accomplishment? I don't know. Yeah, they're educated, Sharon.
Sharon attended Edinboro State University (obviously one of the most vigorous academic institutions in the world) studying creative writing and fine arts, likely the hardest double major in academia. Dropped out to pursue acting. Went back in 2016 to complete her degree. So, she definitely had the creds to know who is educated and who is not.
Highly educated people are are capable of tremendous stupidity.
In 23 seconds, she said the word 'work' 7 times. Queen of Word Salad rides again!
She lost because she's a horrible candidate. No accomplishments, Far Left agenda, a complete weirdo loser as a running mate, phony (putting on bad accents at different campaign stops), lying about Biden, the border, Trump, on and on. Has nothing to do with race or color. She was/is a terrible candidate.
Sharon Stone believes Trump was elected by uneducated voters. I saw numerous videos of Harris voters who were asked why they were voting for her and they couldn't say why. Well, what is her greatest accomplishment? I don't know. Yeah, they're educated, Sharon.
Sharon attended Edinboro State University (obviously one of the most vigorous academic institutions in the world) studying creative writing and fine arts, likely the hardest double major in academia. Dropped out to pursue acting. Went back in 2016 to complete her degree. So, she definitely had the creds to know who is educated and who is not.
Who legit thought that video was a good idea? She looks like a drunk aunt at her college homecoming trying to give advice to college students.
Maybe folks at the WH or her campaign let her put this out KNOWING how bad it is as some form of revenge. Wouldn’t put it past them based on past comments about how awful she Is to work for.
True. I've known a number of people over the years who are at the 'genius' level that (as the old saying goes) don't know when to come out of the rain. Others....not so smart.....lot of 'street smarts' that are very successful.I don't think education = intelligence. Knowledge and intelligence are not the same to me.
I listened to some of the podcast with O'Malley Dillon, Plouffe, etc. It was amazing how defensive they were ("We had so little time") and also the stupidity of the explanation about why she didn't go on Rogan ("It would have meant taking her out of a battleground state for a day"). Maybe it's to be expected that they are not going to admit making mistakes, but basically if you listen to them you would come away thinking this was an unwinnable race.I find it amusing the Kamala campaign staffers are trying to save their careers now claiming they knew all along Kamala was losing everywhere.
Doubly amusing that they’re pointing out the media polling was completely fraudulent.
What a bunch of hacks.
Thank god they lost.
Can someone give me a legitimate explanation as to why it takes 20+ days to count 207,000 votes? I mean a real valid reason to legitimately justify it. Not just “cause they cheatin” I want to hear one of our resident lefties explain it.
I listened to some of the podcast with O'Malley Dillon, Plouffe, etc. It was amazing how defensive they were ("We had so little time") and also the stupidity of the explanation about why she didn't go on Rogan ("It would have meant taking her out of a battleground state for a day"). Maybe it's to be expected that they are not going to admit making mistakes, but basically if you listen to them you would come away thinking this was an unwinnable race.
The only reason anyone would even know who Sharon Stone is lies solely on the fact she was willing to show the world her cooch in a movie. Congrats Sharon for your contribution to humanity.In 23 seconds, she said the word 'work' 7 times. Queen of Word Salad rides again!
She lost because she's a horrible candidate. No accomplishments, Far Left agenda, a complete weirdo loser as a running mate, phony (putting on bad accents at different campaign stops), lying about Biden, the border, Trump, on and on. Has nothing to do with race or color. She was/is a terrible candidate.
Sharon Stone believes Trump was elected by uneducated voters. I saw numerous videos of Harris voters who were asked why they were voting for her and they couldn't say why. Well, what is her greatest accomplishment? I don't know. Yeah, they're educated, Sharon.
Sharon attended Edinboro State University (obviously one of the most vigorous academic institutions in the world) studying creative writing and fine arts, likely the hardest double major in academia. Dropped out to pursue acting. Went back in 2016 to complete her degree. So, she definitely had the creds to know who is educated and who is not.
but basically if you listen to them you would come away thinking this was an unwinnable race.
It was a close enough election where winning was possible. She did well in the debate so she was not as incapable as you claim. But she was afraid of taking chances and making mistakes, so she didn't go on Rogan or do a number of things that any sensible candidate/campaign would have done. Bottom line - she ran a poor campaign.Was it not unwinnable?
She couldn’t go on Rogan because she’s not a person or candidate who was capable of having a long form conversation.
It was a doom loop once they started putting her in front of cameras. She needed to do the media, but wasn’t capable of doing it.
Their only hope was running the Biden strategy again where they hid him in a basement and pretended it was because of Covid, not because he was mentally incompetent. They’d already fired all their “Trump is Hitler” bullets, so falling back on that as the October surprise fell flat.
Edit: there’s was never any doubt she’d lose a free and fair election. Which is what the above paragraphs refer to. When you couple that with the persistence, Charlie Kirk, etc. and a heightened focus on potential fraud, they couldn’t push it over the top.
It was a close enough election where winning was possible.
The kind of evil that is laid at the feet of everybody who supported Joe Biden.Salvadoran Toddler Traveled Alone to U.S. Border to Find Parents, Says Texas DPS
Texas Department of Public Safety troopers found a two-year-old Salvadoran migrant girl who they say traveled by herself to the U.S. border with Mexico in search of her parents. The little girl crossed the border from Mexico into Texas with a large group of migrants, including 60 unaccompanied...www.breitbart.com
It’s fair to speculate that if not for states with few or no voter ID requirements, she may have had far fewer electoral votes.It was a close enough election where winning was possible. She did well in the debate so she was not as incapable as you claim. But she was afraid of taking chances and making mistakes, so she didn't go on Rogan or do a number of things that any sensible candidate/campaign would have done. Bottom line - she ran a poor campaign.
I know it's way too early (kind of like the b'ball NCAA tourney brackets for '26 that will come out in June of '25), but I wonder if these shifts are permanent or just Trump. Will these demographics vote R when Trump is not on the ticket. When illegals aren't flooding the country will Hispanics, who did it the legal way, vote R,. The black males who saw the 'lawfare' for what it was. Young men who voted for him because of the 'bravado' after an attempted assassination. Etc.The seismic shift in certain demographics that became Trump votes speaks otherwise.
Cause for concern on house seats as Trump fills his cabinet?
Deroy Murdock - How thin is GOP House majority?
jewishworldreview.com
w0mEn: bUt aBoRtIoN…
I’m of the belief that it’s just Trump. Larger than life character with more media coverage than any person I have ever seen in politics. Ever.I know it's way too early (kind of like the b'ball NCAA tourney brackets for '26 that will come out in June of '25), but I wonder if these shifts are permanent or just Trump. Will these demographics vote R when Trump is not on the ticket. When illegals aren't flooding the country will Hispanics, who did it the legal way, vote R,. The black males who saw the 'lawfare' for what it was. Young men who voted for him because of the 'bravado' after an attempted assassination. Etc.
A discussion for 3 years from now.
I know it's way too early (kind of like the b'ball NCAA tourney brackets for '26 that will come out in June of '25), but I wonder if these shifts are permanent or just Trump. Will these demographics vote R when Trump is not on the ticket. When illegals aren't flooding the country will Hispanics, who did it the legal way, vote R,. The black males who saw the 'lawfare' for what it was. Young men who voted for him because of the 'bravado' after an attempted assassination. Etc.
A discussion for 3 years from now.
Wouldn’t call it a seismic shift, seeing he only won a plurality. Looking back, I think a lot of dems like myself were high on hopium. I don’t think there was a single dem nominee that could have beaten Trump this go around. Bad election to be an incumbent.The seismic shift in certain demographics that became Trump votes speaks otherwise.
It’s fair to speculate that if not for states with few or no voter ID requirements, she may have had far fewer electoral votes.
Shouldn’t a reasonable, rational person want to know why that is? Why it could be that in states with more stringent ID requirements, he won, but in states that lacked election integrity, she won? Are the people in the states really that different?
Seems like a major issue.
Trump lost like 70 lawsuits in 2020 after the election. Still no evidence of widespread fraud and the heritage foundation has only found a handful of illegal aliens voting in presidential elections since the 1980’s. Y’all just need to take that LThe media polls were meant to make you think it was close. It was obvious. There was no shot she was going to win an actual election. The only question is whether the democrat ground operation could submit enough ballots to push her over the top.
The fraud was obvious in 2020. Everyone knew what they were going to try and do in 2024, and thankfully, in most places they couldn’t do it.
Couple the increased focus on their dirty tricks with the Republican ground game, and they couldn’t push Kamala over the top.
She had 3 on 1 in the debate and escaped without falling flat on her face. The bar was set so low for her, just speaking in complete sentences was viewed as a win. It was no indication of competence.
She could not do unscripted media appearances. Certainly no for 3 hours.
Trump lost like 70 lawsuits in 2020 after the election. Still no evidence of widespread fraud and the heritage foundation has only found a handful of illegal aliens voting in presidential elections since the 1980’s. Y’all just need to take that L
Wouldn’t call it a seismic shift, seeing he only won a plurality. Looking back, I think a lot of dems like myself were high on hopium. I don’t think there was a single dem nominee that could have beaten Trump this go around. Bad election to be an incumbent.
Trump lost like 70 lawsuits in 2020 after the election. Still no evidence of widespread fraud and the heritage foundation has only found a handful of illegal aliens voting in presidential elections since the 1980’s. Y’all just need to take that L
Just like democrats need to take the L in 24. Big wins across the board for republicans. No voter fraud in this election either. Quit being sore winners. Y’all have all the momentum and will carry that with forward thinking policies.
Same old talking points from every leftist on here. Just repeated bot vomit.Good god it’s like someone pulls a string and you just repeat the standard uninformed lefty lines.
How many of those “70 lawsuits” that Trump “lost” were decided on the merits (or even had any discovery at all), vs those that were thrown out for things like lack of standing?
Will you ever accept a losing election again? Does cheating ever happen on the GOP side? Lake was a bad candidate. Many years in the public eye with lots of flip flop takes. Take anyone else and they win that senate seat. She’s now won as many big election seats in Arizona as I have.Seems like they saw the trump win was too big to rig so they switched to cheating down ballot. Take AZ for example. Zero way trump wins there comfortably but the dems (after several days of counting) pull out a come from behind win.
Their focus on down ballot is absolutely to try to stall. Thats why this down ballot cheating must be called out and addressed.
The gop needs to go all in on these governor races or figure out some way to get these elections cleaned up.
If he actually does what he promised, yes.I know it's way too early (kind of like the b'ball NCAA tourney brackets for '26 that will come out in June of '25), but I wonder if these shifts are permanent or just Trump. Will these demographics vote R when Trump is not on the ticket. When illegals aren't flooding the country will Hispanics, who did it the legal way, vote R,. The black males who saw the 'lawfare' for what it was. Young men who voted for him because of the 'bravado' after an attempted assassination. Etc.
A discussion for 3 years from now.