POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Nothing to see here other than more Olympic opening ceremony bullsh!t.....
Guess it depends on your time line for old school. Lol. Maybe I should have said "90's Democrat."
Save the country from what exactly?I know this. The facebook hens, who had been absolutely silent for months, are out in full force now. Kamala has single, middle-aged, unhappy white women, and chip on their shoulder black women absolutely on fire. My facebook feed is choked with stuff like this.
and quotes like:
We can DO this sisters, get out there and VOTE to save our country!
or
Attention! If you will turn 18 before election day, GO REGISTER and VOTE! This is where we take back(?) our country!!!! (THAT gem, is compliments of my older sister, who, at 65 is so dysfunctional, that I have to manage her finances, and everything that is wrong in her life is someone's else's fault. She literally thinks like a 7 year old child.)
(I guess they don't realize that Trump has made huge strides in the 18 to 29 demographic)
Worst voting bloc in America and it's not even close. They are the most privileged and sheltered people but are convinced life is so hard for them and the only things that makes them rally is 1) killing a baby 2) anything with the gay community
No it's not lol. That's a stupid take with all due respect (because you are mostly a good poster in here).
I knew it. As soon as that POS said it was time for cities to clean up homeless camps I knew he only did it for his own future.
The RNC wanted Rubio or Doug Burgum.
I'll take this over that or Haley, thank God.
Would've preferred DeSantis or Vivek but whatever.
What the hell is the fascination with that crap?
Mocking The Last Supper.
At the end of the day, your average white liberal/Democrat politician is a "tourist"...
Just liberals being liberals. It's how they role.
That last supper must have been absolutely LOADED with carbs...
Manhattan DA Argues Trump Case Not Affected by Presidential Immunity
The district attorney says that all criminal charges in this case involve ‘unofficial acts’ and therefore do not fall under presidential immunity.
If nothing else, you have to admire their spunk. They're going to sink with the ship. Bless their little misguided hearts...Manhattan DA Argues Trump Case Not Affected by Presidential Immunity
The district attorney says that all criminal charges in this case involve ‘unofficial acts’ and therefore do not fall under presidential immunity.www.theepochtimes.com
just one more reason i hate commies
Wait, so are you admitting that the J6 protest was not in fact an actual "insurrection?"
With some people, you can almost see the frogs squirming in their heads from afar.
Mother gets 3-plus years in prison for blocking abortion clinic
Bevelyn Beatty Williams, 33, was convicted of “interference, including by threats and force, with individuals seeking to obtain and provide” abortions.
www.catholicnewsagency.com
just check the sources that are reporting that he is polling poorly, trump will replace him etc. it’s just the expected barrage of negativeism coming from the expected sources.
I left out the Dims plans becasue they are appallingly worse. But this shows (again) that Trump is no conservative. And MAGA doesn't GAS.
"The economic platforms of both presidential candidates are littered with antigrowth proposals. .... Donald Trump is proposing to hold the line on spending and current tax policy but would raise tariffs and pursue an economically destructive immigration policy. ......
Tariffs are fees charged on goods imported by U.S. companies. These increased costs typically result in higher prices for consumers. The hope is that the increase in the relative costs of imports compared with goods produced domestically will lead to a shift toward domestically produced goods. But the benefits of any shift are more than offset by inefficiencies, the higher costs to domestic consumers, and the foreign retaliation that usually occurs. ..... I
in 2018 Mr. Trump imposed tariffs of 25% on steel imports and 10% on aluminum imports, declaring, “Trade wars are good and easy to win.” China retaliated in various ways and Mr. Trump’s promise that manufacturing jobs would suddenly flood back to the U.S. proved worthless. Global trade and production declined and U.S. manufacturing jobs flattened.
Tariffs violate the simple but sound law of comparative advantage. It may be wise to ban trade in sensitive goods related to national security, but Mr. Trump’s fear of bilateral trade deficits with foreign partners is simply economic nonsense.....
Meanwhile, both candidates have pledged not to touch the benefits and structures of Social Security and Medicare. These are the primary sources of large deficits and mounting government debt. Promising to leave these programs alone may be good short-run politics, but it’s irresponsibly bad economics.
I’ve prepared side-by-side comparisons of presidential candidates’ economic platforms since 1992. A review of these comparisons makes two things obvious. First, the Democratic Party has moved decidedly leftward. ......
Second, while Mr. Trump’s tax and spending platform is standard GOP stuff (i.e., Rino stuff. LOL.), his proposals on tariffs and immigration move the party away from its traditional embrace of free enterprise. His mass-deportation plan is impractical and antithetical to economic growth in a nation whose population is aging.
"The economic platforms of both presidential candidates are littered with antigrowth proposals. .... Donald Trump is proposing to hold the line on spending and current tax policy but would raise tariffs and pursue an economically destructive immigration policy. ......
Tariffs are fees charged on goods imported by U.S. companies. These increased costs typically result in higher prices for consumers. The hope is that the increase in the relative costs of imports compared with goods produced domestically will lead to a shift toward domestically produced goods. But the benefits of any shift are more than offset by inefficiencies, the higher costs to domestic consumers, and the foreign retaliation that usually occurs. ..... I
in 2018 Mr. Trump imposed tariffs of 25% on steel imports and 10% on aluminum imports, declaring, “Trade wars are good and easy to win.” China retaliated in various ways and Mr. Trump’s promise that manufacturing jobs would suddenly flood back to the U.S. proved worthless. Global trade and production declined and U.S. manufacturing jobs flattened.
Tariffs violate the simple but sound law of comparative advantage. It may be wise to ban trade in sensitive goods related to national security, but Mr. Trump’s fear of bilateral trade deficits with foreign partners is simply economic nonsense.....
Meanwhile, both candidates have pledged not to touch the benefits and structures of Social Security and Medicare. These are the primary sources of large deficits and mounting government debt. Promising to leave these programs alone may be good short-run politics, but it’s irresponsibly bad economics.
I’ve prepared side-by-side comparisons of presidential candidates’ economic platforms since 1992. A review of these comparisons makes two things obvious. First, the Democratic Party has moved decidedly leftward. ......
Second, while Mr. Trump’s tax and spending platform is standard GOP stuff (i.e., Rino stuff. LOL.), his proposals on tariffs and immigration move the party away from its traditional embrace of free enterprise. His mass-deportation plan is impractical and antithetical to economic growth in a nation whose population is aging.
Trump could appoint a potted fern as his VP and the loonies would find a way to make a plant seem racist.
Meanwhile, hamas wannabes in DC walk free after rioting, burning the US flag and defacing national monuments. SmhMother gets 3-plus years in prison for blocking abortion clinic
Bevelyn Beatty Williams, 33, was convicted of “interference, including by threats and force, with individuals seeking to obtain and provide” abortions.
Even granting all of this, you left out the most important reason to vote for Trump; the sheer entertainment value. It is quite literally "off the charts."
Deficit spending is going to increase, no matter who wins. At least let us have some fun, watching the pearl clutchers' heads explode.
We may never get this chance again in our lifetimes.
I would say mainly because I think there will be a fair number of voters who tune into the debate(s) who otherwise don’t pay much attention until election time. That may be the only venue whete Trump will have a direct opportunity to challenge her on all her stated positions. We KNOW the liberal media is going to run cover and ignore all of these issues for the next 4 months. They will want to make this like Obama’s campaign where there was no serious vetting of positions.
That’s fine but listen that VP is the attack dog in elections and this dud has been neutered by the media. You may not want some of the others but it’s about winning not running two people based on principle and lose.
The FBI cleans up their director's mess and puts out a statement that it was indeed a bullet that hit Trump.
This perfectly illustrates the difference between a guy's sense of humor, and a woman's LOL
Sharon Stone promises to leave the US if Trump elected president again
Next stop: France or Italy.
metro.co.uk
I see they are still shamelessly putting the Chinese Great leap forward flags in their campaign banners again.
Per wiki:
"Three Red Banners (Chinese: 三面红旗) was an ideological slogan in the late 1950s which called on the Chinese people to build a socialist state. The "Three Red Banners" also called the "Three Red Flags," consisted of the General Line for socialist construction, the Great Leap Forward and the people's communes.[1][2][3]
After the first Five-Year Plan, the People's Republic of China continued its socialist construction by introducing "Three Red Banners Movement". The General Line directed the Chinese people to "go all out, aim high, and build socialism with greater, faster, better, and more economical results."[2] By the end of 1958, nearly all Chinese peasants had been organized into communes averaging 5000 households each. All privately owned property was taken for or contributed to the communes and people were not allowed to cook their own food and instead ate in communal dining halls."
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Mark Pope post-game press conference video.- Latest: Dontworryboutit23
-
-
-
-
