Would think Trump with input from his inner circle (Laura, Eric, Don Jr. etc) is not going to screw up the VP pick. So many angles to this pick which is why I think it is such a critical decision Trump has to make. He needs someone who have proven loyalty to him and the MAGA agenda. Not many out there in the current pool of candidates. Too many come lately’s who are clinging on to him for their own personal agendas.
He seems nice. I bet he’s fun to talk to at parties."Fire everybody. Seal off the buildings. Make sure everybody is out. And burn the gawd damn place to the ground"--Keith Olbermann haha
Even 25th amendment
As I have mentioned before, Republicans knew how weak Biden was/is and backed off the impeachment stuff. He and Kamala gives Trump the best chance at winning. The strategy of sitting back and letting them destroy themselves is the best play.If you are republican, you make them ride it out.
Biden hasn’t changed mentally in the last four years. The dems had four years to a25 him. **** them.
Make the dems trot out some bullshit story to take him off of the ticket.
He needs to consult someone that knows what theyre doing and then listen to them.
Where is this binder full of outsiders willing to do this work?
Say they tap you insanity. Are you willing for the for the initial anal swab, but also the dildos of increasing size until you resign or they put you in jail?
Most people that have a good thing going aren’t up to the challenge.
Trump, or any outsider, can only choose from career swamp.
If you are republican, you make them ride it out.
Biden hasn’t changed mentally in the last four years. The dems had four years to a25 him. **** them.
Make the dems trot out some bullshit story to take him off of the ticket.
Maybe... but I think if Trump wins and is illegitimately kept out... this country revolts... and it will be glorious if it happens.Re: Glenn Youngkin
I love him as my governor. I believe he is a good, principled man.
But for political purposes, I think he’s happy to reside in the squishy middle, in the name of non-partisanship. (Note: He’s never had an R-legislature to work with in 2.5 years as Governor).
While he was my preferred candidate in ‘21, the caucus system by which he was selected has always been viewed as a little suspect.
My take then was that he was an “establishment” selection being set up for a future presidential run.
If Trump’s election (prison, or not) becomes a foregone conclusion, then the establishment/uniparty becomes that much more invested in his VP selection.
In retrospect, I think we all see now that Pence was a deep state plant, and we “assume” that Trump won’t be fooled this time around.
However, let’s not pretend like they don’t have a knife to Trump’s throat. They can and will send him to prison next month for the rest of his life.
To think they can’t and won’t try and stick him with the closest thing they can to Gerald Ford is more than just a little naive.
And while I don’t think today that Youngkin is Gerald Ford 2.0, the reality is that in general, most politicians are extremely compromised, and who knows what Youngkin (or anyone else for that matter) might sacrifice for a shot at the White House?
And maybe that’s not Youngkin. Maybe it’s Burgum, etc. Who knows? But I am becoming increasingly fascinated by this selection.
You’re the one gaslighting you projecting POS. You even tried to deflect, claiming The Communist Manifesto was the driver of the assignment numbers so I had to specifically post the Das Kapital numbers. Every time your current narrative is debunked you just pivot to something else to get destroyed on. Sorry, data is more reliable than “Everyone knows that is false.” Take that delusional crap back to your god Trump and his “Everyone’s saying…”
Yeah, Splain that one resident Libs? If they have their way, they’ll plant the Republican candidate too.
I'm hoping that Roy is just throwing a big stick out there in order to stir the pot some. more.Correct.
Not sure why Chip Roy thinks this is a good idea.
You resident libs going to defend that now?
They will think of any wild excuse rather than state the obvious:
Respectfully, you've been parroting this for years and don't what the f you are talking about. We literally study this in undergraduate economics classes. It all depends on relative price elasticity of supply and demand. When demand is more elastic than supply, the corporations most definitely pay more of the cost of the tax. So if you tax food and fuel (inelastic demand), most of those taxes will be passed on to consumers. However, if you place a tax on, say, iPhones and Mercedes Benz's, the producers will pay a larger portion of the tax (it comes out of their profits).*(corporate taxes aren't even an actual thing. They don't exist. They're just a cost of production. They don't actually pay them. WE do)
They are contending with the Kamala Harris effect which they wrought upon themselves. Biden has to declare he’s withdrawing. So I think they have to select Biden’s running mate carefully, that’s who will be the next President.Yeah, some of the revelations today about inability to transfer Biden’s campaign funds to another candidate, and challenges with changing ballots after certain dates in key swing states now make me think it’s a long shot they they can replace him. Very interesting to watch this unfold.
However, if they indeed think they are inevitably hitched to Biden this election, it makes me think they will push even harder for the NY judge to actually sentence Trump to a lengthy prison term. They may see it as their only shot at taking him down now.
If anything I think Obama’s presence after the debate in the media clarifies who’s pulling the strings.Yes...but the press let too many horses out of the barn. The Obama tweet was a signal this is the narrative they've gotta run with bc, while they don't care, they'll be some hang up with some ballot laws, etc
Next week we'll be hearing more about how it was just a bad debate, he's actually still doing cartwheels around aides
No, those are just sensationalist rightwing headlines. Which you’re a moron so you don’t read beyond. All they did was lay them out for photos. Which is what I said at the time. Because it was obvious.
Who does? I think people are sad & pi$$ed for the country.
I much favor taxes on things than people.Respectfully, you've been parroting this for years and don't what the f you are talking about. We literally study this in undergraduate economics classes. It all depends on relative price elasticity of supply and demand. When demand is more elastic than supply, the corporations most definitely pay more of the cost of the tax. So if you tax food and fuel (inelastic demand), most of those taxes will be passed on to consumers. However, if you place a tax on, say, iPhones and Mercedes Benz's, the producers will pay a larger portion of the tax (it comes out of their profits).
Meanwhile, back in the real world...There was never a time where illegals weren't being paid less to do a job. It started as slaves doing it for free and then illegal & legal immigrants doing it for dirt cheap. Americans don't work agriculture and they don't like cleaning dishes and toilets. get over it already. Every time America has tried a hardcore crackdown on immigration it has backfired and forced us to mass migrate in workers. 9/11 has turned republicans into a bunch of scared babies. the GoP doesn't even pretend to push policy anymore. They just fear monger on mexicans and muslims and their base loves it.
Assuming this is accurate, one possible way to cut into the wealthy's wealth could be to include gifts to foundations as estate taxable above a certain amount, say $1B.As they are in the overall economy....
'A huge influx of foreign-born workers, a large portion coming through illegal immigration across the southern border under Biden, has been a key force bolstering top-line economic growth numbers, like gross domestic product, in recent quarters. The result of the influx is that the economy appears to be growing, but to the benefit of foreign-born workers rather than native-born Americans.'
![]()
The Massive Populist Wave Taking Over America Can Be Explained With One Stat
The rise of populist politics in the U.S. has coincided with a massive shift in the level of wealth held by average Americans compared to the elite.dailycaller.com