POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
What a lying pos.
Over 2 million fentanyl pills, over 600 pounds of meth seized in a 25 day period at Nogales
Yeah… I know. But think it would have been interesting if Trump publicly proposed they each simply meet on a stage and discuss/debate/share their views on a set of subjects. Heck, even lay out 10 topics and assign 10 minutes to each topic. Throw out the moderators.
Here’s an even handed list to cater to both sides:
1. Border security/immigration
2. Inflation
3. Ukraine/Russia
4. Israel/Hamas
5. Energy/oil/gas/green initiatives
6. Taxes
7. January 6th
8. Abortion
9. Handling of classified documents
10. Student loan forgiveness
Last edited:
~It will be interesting to see how Biden walks on stage with Obama's hand up his ass.
~Would pay to see The Donald come on stage and knock out 20 pushups in front of the dementia patient....look down at Jill and say come get you some.
~Would pay to see The Donald come on stage and knock out 20 pushups in front of the dementia patient....look down at Jill and say come get you some.
Californians With No SSN Can Use A Gym Membership To Vote
In California, voters with no driver's license or SSN can vote if they show a gym membership, credit card, or other low-security ID.
thefederalist.com
Another thing to change ... we know Biden has been working on the questions all week. The questions should be made public well in front of the debate. That would help eliminate the attempted "gotcha" questions.
Some of the "leaders" in this country are a complete joke.Californians With No SSN Can Use A Gym Membership To Vote
In California, voters with no driver's license or SSN can vote if they show a gym membership, credit card, or other low-security ID.
Poll: Black Voter Support for Trump at 23% -- Up from 19% in 2020
A CBS News/YouGov poll shows former President Donald Trump is making gains with black voters, with support at 23 percent -- nearly double from 2020.
www.breitbart.com
There’s has got to be more to the story.
Are the videos of the US bombing civilians still on Wikileaks?
As corrupt as the democrats are, and as immune as they are to any consequences from their actions, forcing them to take down DNC emails as part of the plea deal seems too obviously corrupt. And it doesn’t seem like a guy who’s been seemingly standing on principles for years would do. Obviously the emails are in the public domain, but it will be much easier for democrats to use their Gestapo to target individuals who share them and don’t have the fame or notoriety as Wikileaks.
Also it seems stupid. The democrats are much better criminals than to give someone a corrupt plea deal with winks and nods if there’s a possibility that 6months from now a new guy can pardon any and all crimes and wipe away the quid pro quo in the plea deal to protect democrats upon which the plea would rely.
Edit: obviously they can always just kill him like Hilary talked about in the past, or maybe they know full well they’ll be placing Biden in office again so it doesn’t matter. But then releasing assange wouldn’t matter anyway, because it’s clear pandering.
Edit: obviously they can always just kill him like Hilary talked about in the past, or maybe they know full well they’ll be placing Biden in office again so it doesn’t matter. But then releasing assange wouldn’t matter anyway, because it’s clear pandering.
when massie tries to speak jamal just shouts louder and closer. typical commie pos
Vance is another self-own, harkening back to the self-evident point I made earlier about style being more important than substance.
Vance (like Vivek) is competent and self-made, an exemplary advocate and articulation of your conservative worldview. But he's Lilly-white family man Dad: his style and substance only appeals to votes you already have locked in.
VIvek is everything Vance is with regard to competence and family values, and MAGA-er than DJT even providing that oft mentioned assassination insuracne, but his style, that is to say his arrogance and self-assuredness, his combative and argumentative style, is off-putting to some, mainly the weak-kneed low-ifnormation democrats you have no hope of getting anwya. Where he will appeal however is to minority dem voters, particularly men, who are simply sick and tired of the BS. You weaken dem voter turnout in their corrupt strongholds like detroit and philly, you win the election going away.
I can’t imagine the VP pick is going to sway voters one way of the other. Though I’ve not looked at polling.
Only thing imo is that they would each focus only on their points, not a range of subjects. I'd be for same except with randomly drawn handwritten questions from people that both candidates' teams had vetted.
Trump's problem is people thinking he's going to be nutso. Neither Vance or Vivek help allay that. Burgum, Youngkin & Carson would.
I don't know what the hell happened, but gas jumped to $3.69 from $3.15 around here 3 days ago.
I think it's the only thing it's good for, solidify and swing some small but significant subset of voters.
It's why you run Pence with his values (I deem him fake) to solidify conservatives who are uncomfortable voting for Mr. grabembytheussy, or a quasi-African American so clyburn rallies the troops for you in south carolina.
Compare Burgum or Youngkin vs. Kamala. Then think if either Prez candidate becomes disabled (More so in Biden's cae.).
+4% from 19% is hardly double.Poll: Black Voter Support for Trump at 23% -- Up from 19% in 2020
A CBS News/YouGov poll shows former President Donald Trump is making gains with black voters, with support at 23 percent -- nearly double from 2020.
Ok… I’m fine with whatever. Pre-pick the topics/questions. Let each candidate give their views and positions, and have some back and forth questioning and actually DEBATING each other.
If we’re being honest, the current “debate” platform involves very little debating. It’s more like a joint interview/press conference where the media hack (ahem… “moderator”) asks baiting/gotcha type questions, the candidates answers how they wish, and the hacks then insert themselves as real time fact checkers, usually in a one sided fashion.
Bowman blames racism on his loss.........while going racist and blaming Jews for this loss.
how tf did this pos ever become a judge? smdh
He yells "Damn I'm in the zone up here!" during his concession speech haha
Where did you get 19% from contrarian cat? The article clearly says he was at 12% in 20 and now is at 23%. That’s nearly double.
Which Im guessing means Barrett and Kavanaugh voted with the liberal judges again?
That's not his hand!!
Similar threads
