ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
No as I said earlier, I think he likely did it but the evidence presented was basically a frame-up. I’ll try to provide a link to some info when I get a chance. Won’t be soon. Going on 2 weeks vacation.

To me, the salient point was he was going to kill himself but Cowlings convinced him otherwise.
Thanks for clearing that up.

All these years I had thought the salient point was that he nearly decapitated his wife and brutally murdered another person.

Have a great vacation, I’m about to head out on one myself.
 
Political troll. He posted last night that Michelle Obama's mother passed and used the news to do a weird "awww too bad" and then called Michelle Michael. Likely some middle aged guy whose been banned several times in the past. I dunno, trolling and shit like that stops at a family member dying. Just me though.
Most of us call Michelle “Michael” at times. You’ll have to prove she’s been a woman all her life before we’ll stop. Until then we will always be skeptical. “She” literally has pictures with a bulge.
 
As an independent, I'm seeing tons of anti-Semitism, hate speech, etc. coming out of social media right now. And it's not just the GOP. It's the Dems too. Extremism is on the rise. I read several posts today about how "maybe the Nazis were right". Lord in Heaven. This is what it's come to?
Not just the GOP? What world do you live in? What more hateful has been happening besides the pro-Gaza protests & camp-ins with their antisemitic chants? You're nothing but another lib disguising as an independent.
 
So Dion says he doesn't have an agenda against Christians; "Initial disclaimer: I have no agenda here, no overarching point." The "no overarching point" is actually the most true thing that idiot has ever spewed.

Then he displays his arrogance and ignorance in one statement, "Not one single instance of it [resurrection] to enter into the evidentiary record in all this time we've had solid record-keeping." What he is saying is, if we had a court trial with 4,000 contemporary witnesses, that wouldn't count as evidence. There are excellent books on this subject, so I'll move on.

Then he insinuates there is evidence that Israel rapes, tortured children in front of their parents, baked babies in ovens, slaughtered innocents, kidnapped, has rejected attempts at peace, hides in areas where innocents are put at risk and lets Palestine starve. Let's see the evidence, EconDion!! Any one of those.

Then he says he isn't "making excuses". No, no, no, he's above that, he simply "pointed out why that murdering was happening". See the difference? Not making excuses ... he's pointing out reasons. TOTALLY different.

Good grief that dude is a special kind of stupid. Only surpassed by his somehow mentally-lesser Shins, who liked every one of those idiotic posts.

They are racists, mentally unstable, ignorant, and are here to troll. They will lie all day every day if it gets a reaction/response. They are no doubt the little boys throwing rocks at the big kids on the playground and running away, then crying because they get their assets beat when caught. Just like the programmed Palestinians....

"Hey, let's pick a fight and cry when we lose. If we record it, we can edit it, sell it to CNN, and get attention for it for years while the full video is censored on the internet!" - literal, liberal evil
 
Putin invaded because he wanted to, he doesn't need a war to control the Russian populace. Ukrainians are fighting and dying because of his ambitions. They're the ones risking their lives, not us. The least we can do is supply them. Y'all would've been bitching about the cost of Lend-Lease supplying the dirty commies had you been alive for WWII.
GOyuCXkW4AAzuTq
 
I haven't seen anyone on here (nor do I know anyone in real life) that denies that the Civil War was primarily about slavery.

I can't imagine a black person voting for Biden (given his proven record of racism during his political career), so I guess we're even.

For the south the war was about economics and autonomy which was for the south as inextricably linked to slavery as the Democrat party is to slavery.

For the north the war wasn't about slavery. It was about economics and control of the south.

I can't imagine anyone with reason voting for Biden and have no idea how he was elected to congress or managed to retain any job to which he's been elected/hired. He must simply be a sock puppet that votes however he's told to vote.
 
For the south the war was about economics and autonomy which was for the south as inextricably linked to slavery as the Democrat party is to slavery.

For the north the war wasn't about slavery. It was about economics and control of the south.
The South's economy & autonomy was slaves' driven & they knew it.

Control of the South = maintaining Union.

Not sure what North economics had to do with it. They would have still gotten everything they ever did from the South: cotton.
 
The South's economy & autonomy was slaves' driven & they knew it.

Control of the South = maintaining Union.

Thank you for not stating a single thing my post didn't already say. Lol

Not sure what North economics had to do with it.

Of course not. Why would a liberal expect to understand economics?

They would have still gotten everything they ever did from the South: cotton.

Because they would've paid a far b greater price for that cotton, and the South would have been using that extra revenue to manufacture and in direct competition with the North. The North could afford to complain about slavery while benefitting from it, just as the left complains about low wages while looting stores, taking govt money, and buying goods on the backs of Chinese and other slave labor.

"It's always about economics, stupid.."
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
Not just the GOP? What world do you live in? What more hateful has been happening besides the pro-Gaza protests & camp-ins with their antisemitic chants? You're nothing but another lib disguising as an independent.
This is what I'm talking about. I am liking this transformation, vh. Well done!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheFrontRunner
Thank you for not stating a single thing my post didn't already say. Lol



Of course not. Why would a liberal expect to understand economics?



Because they would've paid a far b greater price for that cotton, and the South would have been using that extra revenue to manufacture and in direct competition with the North. The North could afford to complain about slavery while benefitting from it, just as the left complains about low wages while looting stores, taking govt money, and buying goods on the backs of Chinese and other slave labor.

"It's always about economics, stupid.."
You didn't state what I wrote. You dodged it with fancy terms to suit your beliefs vs. being straightforward.

Why would the North have paid more for the cotton with the South separated than if the South remained in the Union? Still South's closest & best market - lowest shipping costs. Is South going to cut their own throats by charging the North more than anyone else?

South would have no more incentive to industrialize than they already did - very little. Cotton & other crops made them great money already. And the North had 3x the South's people. Capitalism works wonders. Slavery doesn't.

Your mind lives in fantasyland.
 
Which means they will hold meaningless senate and house hearings and nothing will be done. Let’s face it. The people have to change this at the ballot box. If that’s still even possible with the DNC election fraud machine still going strong.
 
You didn't state what I wrote. You dodged it with fancy terms to suit your beliefs vs. being straightforward.

I stated exactly what you reposted. Lol.

Why would the North have paid more for the cotton with the South separated than if the South remained in the Union? Still South's closest & best market - lowest shipping costs. Is South going to cut their own throats by charging the North more than anyone else?

You're hilarious. Why do some countries pay other countries more for goods not produced by them than they do their own goods? Why would the federal govt not want to lose tariff & tax revenue on goods the South produced? It wasn't just about then. It was about the future and long term revenue.

The North needed the South to stay where they were, and everyone knows that. Why do you act like it's some mystery? The North had already found a new slave labor force in the carribbean, and were expanding elsewhere too, so they didn't need the South to retain slavery anymore, but they needed the South to not be manufacturing for as long as possible. They needed their labor force to stay put so they wouldn't soon see what happened in the 1970s.


South would have no more incentive to industrialize than they already did - very little. Cotton & other crops made them great money already.

You don't say... weird.

They would get and keep more of that money in the South. The rich always want to get richer. The South didn't want to industrialize while they had a good relationship with the North, sure. That relationship was souring very quickly, with the federalists getting into inter and intra state business. The South was being pushed into the fight and into industrialization (if it survived as its own nation (confederacy) of states). It couldn't stay mostly agrarian and defend its borders.

And the North had 3x the South's people. Capitalism works wonders. Slavery doesn't.

You're a trip. Lol. Capitalism existed pre-slavery And alongside slavery, Ricardo Mantalban. Indentured servitude, slavery, employment, and robotics are simply means to an end- the production or processing of goods as cheaply as possible.

That (as well as market competition) IS capitalism. There were other producers of cotton and such. The problem for the south was that the money was in very few hands and they wanted to keep it that way.

The industrialists in the North were paying for their help (labor). The South wasn't. The North wanted more money. They needed the war to make an obscene profit, as war always does make the rich richer. They knew that they had to force the war sooner rather than later, before the South was able to mount a better fight.

Your mind lives in fantasyland.

You've been there a while. Where can I get the best deals?

The civil war wasn't about slavery. It was about economics (greed). The excuse was slavery. The marketing was slavery and states' rights (which in fact mostly died with that conflict). You're just too naive like most liberals to understand the difference.

Secession didnt have to mean war. The war had to start when it did for the North to have the advantage. I as a northener by birth and upbringing wouldn't be surprised if the North started it. That's just business.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: blubo and vhcat70
Which means they will hold meaningless senate and house hearings and nothing will be done. Let’s face it. The people have to change this at the ballot box. If that’s still even possible with the DNC election fraud machine still going strong.

It's not possible without a new party. Not likely even WITH a new party. Where do you find thousands of people that can't be bought out or extorted for political positions?
 
For the south the war was about economics and autonomy which was for the south as inextricably linked to slavery as the Democrat party is to slavery.

For the north the war wasn't about slavery. It was about economics and control of the south.

I can't imagine anyone with reason voting for Biden and have no idea how he was elected to congress or managed to retain any job to which he's been elected/hired. He must simply be a sock puppet that votes however he's told to vote.
If the North's involvement had nothing to do with slavery, why did Lincoln sign the Emancipation Proclamation in the middle of the Civil War??
To say the North's involvement had nothing at all to do with slavery is completely devoid of facts.
Was slavery the only reason for the North's involvement? No,but it was definitely one of the main factors involved.
Slavery was the primary conduit for maintaining those economic advantages for the South which is why they were willing to secede and go to war over it.
It was All about economics....with slavery at the center of the $$$$ factors for the South and crops/trade $$$/slavery/unification at the center for the North.
 
Our, including your, government gave those bombs to them in military aid. The same foreign aid y'all generally cry about, and you yourself cry about constantly when it's Ukraine. Why are you not crying about it in this instance?

Well, I've said here multiple times, not one more damn penny to Ukraine, Isreal, or any of the rest.

How about them apples?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT