And, it IS a gotcha when your dumb ass posted it to refute what I said, without reading it and seeing that it says exactly what my point was.
Village Idiot.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
And, it IS a gotcha when your dumb ass posted it to refute what I said, without reading it and seeing that it says exactly what my point was.
Village Idiot.
The way I long ago decided my stance: without provocation, Israel would never attack. The opposite is far from the truth.
Pretty easy. Until you start gobbling up Chinese propaganda.
Disagree. Colorado and Oregon have been doing mail in for years…both have extremely low incidents of voter fraud.
Regardless, mail in is going to be the standard and if you are a supporter of the GOP…it only benefits your candidates to mail in early for a variety of reasons.
Going after a “democrat” so they can pretend they aren’t targeting opponents. People will see the D by his name and run with the “see he goes after Dems too” narrative.
Wtf are the insiders saying about that cocksucker Mike Johnson?
They don’t care about the will of the voters. They’ll replace him with somebody. I have a feeling they’ll do it by picking a running mate and Biden will be cut shortly after the election.
Nothing In that post is incorrect.
Tim Scott had the best organization in those states and AT THE TIME had the most momentum outside anyone but Trump.
Obviously after poor showings in subsequent debates, momentum changed.
Between him and his Super PAC Scott had the most money (outside of Trump) and best organization.
Mail in serves one purpose. To cheat. Point blank. Your a lib Tommy. Worked for the dems. Obviously you support it. But you are a smart dude. Unlike the troll libs that post here.
You damn well know why mail ins are the go to for one party. No id, no one verifying sigs. It's all part of the game.
So of course you know more, and I'm sure those reasons you wouldn't testify under oath either what you have seen and know.
This is by no means an attack on you.you We have all been around these boards for a long time among others. You have always seemed like a good UK poster and you don't press your political views other than from a point of knowledge. Which everyone respects.
But you know nothing good comes from a mail in ballot in an attempt of having legit elections. If you support winning at the cost of cheating this country then maybe was I wrong
You damn well know why mail ins are the go to for one party. No id, no one verifying sigs. It's all part of the game.
So of course you know more, and I'm sure those reasons you wouldn't testify under oath either what you have seen and know.
This is by no means an attack on you.you We have all been around these boards for a long time among others. You have always seemed like a good UK poster and you don't press your political views other than from a point of knowledge. Which everyone respects.
But you know nothing good comes from a mail in ballot in an attempt of having legit elections. If you support winning at the cost of cheating this country then maybe was I wrong
I always feel like non-libs (such as yourself) and people like me and others who absolutely despise mail-in voting are always talking over each other.
Voting should be an in person thing - especially in the age of technology we are in now. You can tell me there are very few instances of fraud as the law is written, but how would we know that somebody who lived in a house with 5 adults didn't just fill out the ballots for the four other people in a house? So there's really a limited way of even proving this.
It would SIGNIFICANTLY help the right if voting were back to a single-day, show up in person event. And I think the GOP should be raising holy hell to get this to be stopped, rather than preaching the virtues of godforsaken places like Oregon as a beacon for future voting.
Other than the clear and concise part.
Regardless, point being, seems pretty clear it was your job to pump up Scott. And while you may have information being on the inside, people would probably discount your posts without full disclosure who’s paying you.
Wait, what? He took bribes? Like millions from a Ukrainian Oil Company? Millions from the Moscow Mayors wife?, Millions from China?I knew he was toast for speaking out against Biden and his border policies lately. Funny how it all works...........
Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar indicted by DOJ on conspiracy and bribery charges
The DOJ filed indictments against Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas on Friday in connection with an investigation into bribes he allegedly took from an Azerbaijan-based company.www.foxnews.com
Oh wait…
Donald Trump’s post on Truth Social last week:
"ABSENTEE VOTING, EARLY VOTING, AND ELECTION DAY VOTING ARE ALL GOOD OPTIONS. REPUBLICANS MUST MAKE A PLAN, REGISTER, AND VOTE!”
One of the most conservative Super PACs:
Jessica Anderson, the president of the conservative super PAC Sentinel Action Fund, which focuses heavily on turning out early and absentee voters, said an embrace of ABEV programs would be a game changer for Republicans in the 2024 presidential race.
"ABSENTEE VOTING, EARLY VOTING, AND ELECTION DAY VOTING ARE ALL GOOD OPTIONS. REPUBLICANS MUST MAKE A PLAN, REGISTER, AND VOTE!”
One of the most conservative Super PACs:
Jessica Anderson, the president of the conservative super PAC Sentinel Action Fund, which focuses heavily on turning out early and absentee voters, said an embrace of ABEV programs would be a game changer for Republicans in the 2024 presidential race.
I have no problem with absentee or early voting as long as it's in person. In person with ID. That solves every concern and the only reason anyone would oppose is because they want to cheat.
Colorado and Oregon? Which are never in doubt for democrats? Those are your exemplars for mail in balloting being clean?
You should have thought a bit before posting that.
I understand your point of view…but that’s just not the reality anymore.
Swing states like PA, NV, MI, WI no longer require a reason to vote absentee…you might not like it, but that’s the deal,
Swing states like PA, NV, MI, WI no longer require a reason to vote absentee…you might not like it, but that’s the deal,
My point of view is that the GOP is going to have to get down in the mud and do what the Dems are doing to generate the most ballots to win elections - mail in voting, early voting, etc.
Colorado had a Republican Senator in the last four years, Cory Gardner.
You realize when you vote in person, the poll workers are all activist volunteers…right?
More election interference of course.
Voting absentee early frees up money to target undecided voters instead of spending that money reminding decided Republican voters to vote.
That’s extremely expensive.
That’s extremely expensive.
Why did he retire? It’s not like the House is bereft of old geezers. He still has a lot to say.
How was Israel formed then? Who are the settlers in the West Bank? Israel has been attacking ceaselessly for nigh on a hundred years.
Last edited:
That chick has made up so much stuff she may not even be from NK at all at this point lol. Joking, but seriously you shouldn't believe a word she says. It's all for the grift.
These are things that have no relation to unsecured chain of custody for mail-in ballots.
The most secure form of voting is same day with ID. That anybody would oppose it sends only one message.
No one has to take my word for it…
Trump, the RNC, and every Republican Super PAC are all saying the same thing.
Absolutely your right to vote in person on Election Day/EV, but you are doing a disservice to conservative candidates.
Trump, the RNC, and every Republican Super PAC are all saying the same thing.
Absolutely your right to vote in person on Election Day/EV, but you are doing a disservice to conservative candidates.
🥱
That's a YP, not a MP. P stands for problem, and I honestly don't even understand how that's a YP, as far as you're concerned. Are you a Palestinian refugee, or something?
Okay, that’s your view…but the voting laws have changed, you might not like it…but that’s the reality.
You don’t seem to be following.
If vote by mail wasn’t rife with fraud, what you say would be correct,
But if I vote by mail and my opponent casts 2 fraudulent ballots by mail, there’s no point in it and no advantage. Again, we merely have to look at who is pushing it to get an idea of why.
I wonder what changed since 2004?
“During a 2004 Congressional hearing, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-NY, said, “In my experience in New York, paper ballots are extremely susceptible to fraud. I could show you experience which would make your head spin.” Just two years ago in a legislative hearing in Austin, a prosecutor from South Texas (and registered Democrat) testified: “Any time you have ballots that are outside the polling location, you’re going to have fraud…I would never recommend everyone voting by mail – it invites fraud.”
Why does in-person voting stop fraud? How do you know your vote is being tallied and reported correctly?
How? Why?
Notice he left out Mail-in voting. Absentee typically requires you request a ballot and have to have a valid reason for it. Early voting generally means in-person at a polling place or at the county clerks office. Trump didn’t mention mass mailing ballots to every name on a register that likely hasn’t been purged.
How have the voting laws changed to make mail in ballots more secure than same day ballots?
I do follow.
If you think trusting your paper ballot or digital ballot in person at a location with volunteer activists is more secure, that’s fine.
The mail in these days is tracked where you can check on it 24/7 and get confirmation when your vote is received.
And if you are concerned about chain of custody, you can submit absentee in person at your local clerk of court.
I’m just letting you know, that you are doing a disservice to your candidates by being stubborn.
If you think trusting your paper ballot or digital ballot in person at a location with volunteer activists is more secure, that’s fine.
The mail in these days is tracked where you can check on it 24/7 and get confirmation when your vote is received.
And if you are concerned about chain of custody, you can submit absentee in person at your local clerk of court.
I’m just letting you know, that you are doing a disservice to your candidates by being stubborn.
Similar threads
